Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Day of the week effect and Baltic stock exchanges

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15678/PM.2018.0402.02

Abstract

Objective: There is an ongoing debate in the field of finance and economics on the existence of abnormal equity returns associated with calendar events. Commentaries including tax-loss selling at year-end, cash flows at month-end and negative news flow over the weekend give convincing evidence in support of returns abnormalities. In the mainstream markets (sector and geography wise) the topic of calendar anomalies was heatedly debated by industry participants and academics. Baltic bourses, however, received less attention. Given the gap, this current research was set to examine daily variations in the performance of the NASDAQ Baltic series.

Research Design & Methods: A well-established parametric algorithm was employed to test whether variations in returns are statistically different throughout week. Dummy-variable regression with an additional set of dummies that controlled for outliers in the series was performed.

Findings: The study found no evidence in support of the day-of-the-week in four NASDAQ Baltic series. However, Thursday and Friday came out as being positive and significant in Vilnius and Riga series.

Contribution & Value Added: The paper adds additional evidence on the contested issue of calendar anomalies. Certainly, differentials achieved on Thursday or Friday would not generate abnormal returns for institutional or individual investor. However, investors could use this updated knowledge to trade more effectively.

Keywords

Stocks, Baltic, Market, Returns, Monday

PDF

References

  1. Aktan, B., Korsakiene, R. and Smaliukiene, R. (2010). Time‐varying volatility modelling of Baltic stock markets. Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol.11 (3), 511-532.
  2. Bachelier (1900). Theory of Speculation, In: Davis, M. and Etheridge, A. (2006). Louis Bachelier's Theory of Speculation: The Origins of Modern Finance. Princeton University Press.
  3. Barber, B.M. and Odean, T. (2000). Trading is hazardous to your wealth: the common stock invest-ment performance of individual investors. Journal of Finance, Vol. 55 (2), 773-806.
  4. Cho, Y.H., Linton, O. and Whang, Y.J. (2007). Are there Monday effects in stock returns: A stochas-tic dominance approach, Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol.14 (5), 736-755.
  5. Deltuvaite, V. (2015). An Empirical Investigation of the Baltic Stock Markets Global Integration. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.213, 430-435.
  6. Fama, E.F. (1965). The Behavior of Stock-Market Prices, The Journal of Business, Vol.38 (1), 34-105.
  7. Fama, E.F. (1965). The Behavior of Stock-Market Prices. The Journal of Business, Vol.38 (1), pp.34-105.
  8. Fama, E.F., Fisher, L., Jensen, M.C. and Roll, R. (1969). The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information. International Economic Review, Vol.10 (1), 1-21.
  9. Ferguson, N. (2009). The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World. Penguin Books.
  10. French, K.R. (1980). Stock returns and the weekend effect. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.8 (1), 55-69.
  11. Godfrey, M.D., Granger, C.W.J. and Morgenstern, O. (1964). The random-walk hypothesis of stock market behaviour. Kyklos, Vol.17 (1), 1-30.
  12. Graham, B. and Dodd, D. (1940). Security Analysis. 2nd.ed., McGraw Hill.
  13. Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin.
  14. Kairys Jr., J.P., Kruza, R. and Kumpins, R. (2000). Winners and losers from the introduction of con-tinuous variable price trading: Evidence from the Riga Stock Exchange. Journal of Banking & Fi-nance, Vol.24 (4), 603-624.
  15. Laidroo, L. (2008). Public announcement induced market reactions on Baltic stock exchanges. Baltic Journal of Management, Vol.3 (2), 174-192.
  16. Lewis, M. (2015). Flash Boys: A Wall Street Revolt. W. W. Norton & Company.
  17. Lowenstein, R. (2001). When Genius Failed: The Rise and Fall of Long-Term Capital Management. Random House.
  18. Maciulis, N., Lazauskaite, V. and Bengtsson, E. (2007). Evaluating performance of Nordic and Baltic stock exchanges. Baltic Journal of Management, Vol.2 (2), 140-153.
  19. Maier, G. and Herath, S. (2009). Real Estate Market Efficiency. A Survey of Literature, SRE-Discussion Papers, 2009/07, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna.
  20. Malkiel, B.G. and Fama, E.F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, Vol.25 (2), 383-417.
  21. Mallaby, S. (2011). More Money Than God: Hedge Funds and the Making of a New Elite. Penguin Press.
  22. Maneschiöld, P.O. (2006). Integration Between the Baltic and International Stock Markets. Emerg-ing Markets Finance and Trade, Vol.42 (6), 25-45.
  23. Masood, O., Bellalah, M., Chaudhary, S., Mansour, W., Teulon, F. (2010). Cointegration of Baltic Stock Markets in the Financial Tsunami: Empirical Evidence. International Journal of Business, Vol.15 (1), 119-132.
  24. Miller, E.M. (1988). Why a Day of the Week Effect? Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol.14 (4), 43-48.
  25. NASDAQ Baltic (2016a). Nasdaq Baltic [Internet]. Available at: <http://www.nasdaqbaltic.com/en/exchange-information/about-us/> [Accesses 08 April 2016].
  26. NASDAQ Baltic (2016b). Nasdaq Tallinn: history [Internet]. Available at: <http://www.nasdaqbaltic.com/en/exchange-information/about-us/nasdaq-omx-tallinn-3/history/> [Ac-cesses 08 April 2016].
  27. NASDAQ Baltic (2016c). Nasdaq Vilnius: history [Internet]. Available at: <http://www.nasdaqbaltic.com/en/exchange-information/about-us/nasdaq-omx-vilnius-3/history-4/> [Accesses 08 April 2016].
  28. NASDAQ Baltic (2016d). Nasdaq Riga: history [Internet]. Available at: < http://www.nasdaqbaltic.com/en/exchange-information/about-us/nasdaq-omx-riga-3/history-3/> [Access-es 08 April 2016].
  29. NASDAQ Baltic (2016e). Membership Fees & Price Lists [Internet]. Available at: <http://www.nasdaqbaltic.com/en/products-services/membership-2/member-fees/> [Access-es 30 January 2017].
  30. NASDAQ Baltic (2017). Baltic market indexes [Internet]. Available at: <http://www.nasdaqbaltic.com/market/?pg=charts&lang=en/> [Accesses 30 January 2017].
  31. Nielsson, U. (2007). Interdependence of Nordic and Baltic Stock Markets. Baltic Journal of Econom-ics, Vol.6 (2), 9-27.
  32. Nikkinen, J., Piljak, V. and Äijö, J. (2012). Baltic stock markets and the financial crisis of 2008-2009. Research in International Business and Finance, Vol.26 (3), 398-409.
  33. Pettengill, G.N. (1993). An Experimental Study of the Blue Monday Hypothesis, Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol.22 (3), 241-257.
  34. Philip A.F. (1996). Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits and Other Writings (Wiley Investment Classics). John Wiley & Sons.
  35. Sakalauskas, V and Kriksciuniene, D. (2007). The impact of daily trade volume on the day-of-the-week effect in emerging stock markets. Information technology and control, Vol.36 (1A), 152-157.
  36. Shiller, R. (1981). Do Stock Prices Move Too Much to be Justified by Subsequent Changes in Divi-dends? American Economic Review, Vol.71 (3), 421-36
  37. Shiller, R.J. (2012). Finance and the Good Society. Princeton University Press.
  38. Siegel, J.J. (2014). Stocks for the Long Run 5/E: The Definitive Guide to Financial Market Returns & Long-Term Investment Strategies. McGraw-Hill Education, 5th ed.
  39. Smith, B.M. (2001). Toward Rational Exuberance: The Evolution of the Modern Stock Market. Farrar Straus Giroux.
  40. Smith, B.M. (2004). A History of the Global Stock Market: From Ancient Rome to Silicon Valley. Uni-versity of Chicago Press.
  41. Thaler, R.H. (2015). Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioural Economics. Allen Lane.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.