Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020)
June 2020

Articles

Protection of intellectual property rights in the European Union: The role of customs authorities on the example of Poland

https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2020.0602.03

Published 2020-06-30

  • Małgorzata Czermińska

Małgorzata Czermińska
Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the article is to measure and analyze the scale of trade in counterfeit and pirated goods in the European Union in order to provide decision-makers with solid empirical evidence about this threat. The specific objective is to show the role of customs authorities in preventing infringements of intellectual property rights.

Research Design & Methods: The research methods include the critical review of existing literature, analysis of relevant legal and official documents of the European Union and the case study of the role of the Polish customs authorities in preventing infringements of intellectual property rights.

Findings: The infringement of IPR is no longer limited to branded products such as clothes, luxurious watches, brand-name sunglasses, handbags, but it also concerns more and more popular foodstuffs, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, electronic items and household appliances.

Contribution & Value Added: This paper provides a description of copyright protection, counterfeiting and piracy, but also contains a reference to legal regulations applicable within the European Union and relating to this area, changes to such regulations, as well as the scope of activity, working procedures (and their consequences) of EU Member States’ customs authorities, with special attention given to Polish customs.

Keywords

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), right holders, trade in counterfeit and pirated goods, IPR detentions, customs authorities

pdf

Author Biography

Małgorzata Czermińska

She obtained a doctoral degree (PhD) and a habilitation degree (dr hab.) at Cracow University of Economics. Her research interests include common trade policy of the European Union and its instruments, the common market of the European Union and the exercise of Its fundamental freedoms, facilitation and ensuring security in cross-border trade in goods.

References

  1. Acquah, D. (2015). Trends on the implementation of the EU Customs Regulation: for better or for worse?, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 10, 775-784.
  2. Albers-Müller, N. D. (1999). Consumer misbehaviour: Why people buy illicit goods. Journal of Cus-tomer Marketing, 16(3), 273-287.
  3. Alfadhel, L. (2015). TRIPS and the Rise of Counterfeiting: A Comparative Examination of Trade-mark Protection and Border Measures in the European Union and the Gulf Cooperation Coun-cil. Journal of Trade, Law, and Development, 7(2), 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07363769910271504
  4. Berman, B. (2008). Strategies to detect and reduce counterfeiting activity. Business Horizons, 51(3), 191-199.
  5. Bloch P.H., Bush R.F., & Campbell L. (1993). Consumer “accomplices” in product counterfeiting: a demand-side investigation. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10(4), 27-36. DOI: 10.1108/07363769310047374
  6. Bush, R.F., Bloch, P. H., & Dawson, S. (1989). Remedies for product counterfeiting. Business Hori-zons, 32(1), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(89)90027-X
  7. Casola, L., Kemp, S., & Mackenzie, A. (2009). Consumer decisions in the black market for stolen or counterfeit goods. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2), 162-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2008.06.002
  8. Cesareo., L., Stötinger, B. (2015). United we stand, divided we fall: How firms can engage con-sumers in their fight against counterfeits. Business Horizons 58(5), 527-537.
  9. Chaudhry, P.E. (Ed.) (2017). Handbook of Research on Counterfeiting and Illicit Trade. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  10. Chaudhry, P.E., Cordell, V., & Zimmerman, A. (2005). Modelling anti-counterfeiting strategies in response to protecting intellectual property rights in a global environment. The Marketing Re-view, 5(1), 57-66.
  11. Chaudhry, P.E., Walsh, M. G. (1996). An assessment of the impact of counterfeiting in internation-al markets. Columbia Journal of World Business, XXXI(3), 34-48.
  12. Chaudhry, P.E., Zimmerman, A. (2009). The economics of counterfeit trade: Governments, con-sumers, pirates, and intellectual property rights. Springer.
  13. Chaudhry, P., Zimmerman, A., Peters J. R., & Cordell, V. (2009). Preserving intellectual Property rights: Managerial insight into the escalating counterfeit market quandary. Business Horizons, 52(1), 57-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2008.04.003
  14. Cho, S-H., Fang, X., & Tayur, S. (2015). Combating strategic counterfeiting in licit and illicit supply chains. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 17(3), 273-289.
  15. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1352/2013 of 4 December 2013 establishing the forms provided for in Regulation (EU) No 608/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning customs enforcement of intellectual property rights, OJ L 341, 18.12.2013, 10-31.
  16. Commission notice on the customs enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights concerning goods brought into the customs territory of the Union without being released for free circulation in-cluding goods in transit, (2016/C 244/03), OJ C 244, 5.7.2016, 4-9.
  17. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1891/2004 of 21 October 2004 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1383/2003 concerning customs action against goods suspected of infringing certain intellectual property rights and the measures to be tak-en against goods found to have infringed such rights, OJ L 328, 30.10.2004, 16-49.
  18. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1172/2007 of 5 October 2007 amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 1891/2004 of 21 October 2004 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1383/2003 concerning customs action against goods suspected of infringing certain intellectual property rights and the measures to be taken against goods found to have infringed such rights, OJ L 261, 6.10.2007, 12-23.
  19. Cordell V.V., Wongtada N., & Kieschnick R.L. (1996). Counterfeit purchase intentions: Role of law-fulness attitudes and product traits as determinants. Journal of Business Research, 35(1), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00009-7
  20. Council Regulation (EEC) No 3842/86 of 1 December 1986, laying down measures to prohibit the release for free circulation of counterfeit goods, OJ L 357, 18.12.1986, 1-4.
  21. Council Regulation (EC) No 3295/94 of 22 December 1994, laying down measures
  22. to prohibit the release for free circulation, export, re-export or entry for a suspensive proce-dure of counterfeit and pirated goods exportation, OJ L 341, 30.12.94, 8-13.
  23. Council Regulation (EC) No 241/99 of 25 January 1999, OJ L 27 2.2.1999, 1-5.
  24. Council Regulation (EC) No 1383/2003 of 22 July 2003 concerning customs action against goods suspected of infringing certain intellectual property rights and the measures to be taken against goods found to have infringed such rights, OJ L 196, 2.8.2003, 7-14.
  25. Database EUIPO. Retrieved May 03, 2020, https://euipo.europa.eu/tunnel-web/secure/webdav/guest/document_library/observatory/img/new_map/PL/images/contribution_en.png
  26. EUIPO (2019a). Status Report on IPR Infringement. Retrieved January 03, 2020, Retrieved January 09, 2020, from www.euipo.europa.eu.
  27. EUIPO (2019b). Report on the EU enforcement of intellectual property rights results at EU borders and in Member States 2013-2017, Retrieved January 09, 2020,from euipo.europa.eu.
  28. EUIPO, EUROPOL (2019). Intellectual Property Crime Threat Assessment 2019. Retrieved May 04, 2020, from euipo.europa.eu.
  29. EU publications (2019). 2019 status report on IPR infringement. Retrieved May 03, 2020, from euipo.europa.eu.
  30. European Commission (2003). Proposal for a Council Regulation concerning customs action against goods suspected of infringing certain intellectual property rights and the measures to be tak-en against goods found to have infringed such rights, COM (2003)20 final, explanatory memo-randum.
  31. European Commission (2008). Report on the EU customs enforcement of intellectual property rights: Results at the EU border 2007. Publications Office of the European Union.
  32. European Commission (2013). Report on the EU customs enforcement of intellectual property rights: Results at the EU border 2012. Publications Office of the European Union.
  33. European Commission (2017). Report on the EU customs enforcement of intellectual property rights: Results at the EU border 2016. Publications Office of the European Union.
  34. European Commission (2018). Report on the EU customs enforcement of intellectual property rights: Results at the EU border 2017. Publications Office of the European Union.
  35. European Commission (2019). Report on the EU customs enforcement of intellectual property rights: Results at the EU border 2018. Publications Office of the European Union.
  36. Gentry J.W., Putrevu S., & Shultz C.J. (2006). The effects of counterfeiting on consumer search. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5(3), 245-256. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.176
  37. Gentry J.W., Putrevu S., Shultz C.J., & Commuri S. (2001). How about Ralph Lauren? The separa-tion of brand and product in counterfeit culture. In M. C. Gilly, J. Meyers-Levy (Eds.) Advances in Consumer Research (pp. 49-59). Association for Consumer Research.
  38. Grossman G. M., Shapiro C. (1988a). Foreign counterfeiting of status goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(1), 79-100.
  39. Grossman G.M., Shapiro C. (1988b). Counterfeit-product trade. The American Economic Review, March, 59-75.
  40. Harvey, M. (1987). Industrial product counterfeiting: problems and proposed solutions. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 2(4), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb006038
  41. Heinonen, J. A., Spink, J.,& Wilson, J. M. (2014). When crime events defy classification: The case of product counterfeiting as white collar crime. Security Journal, 30 (2), 621-639. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.18
  42. Jain, S. C. (1996). Problems in international protection of intellectual property rights. Journal of International Marketing, 4(1), 9-32.
  43. Jandhyala, S. (2015). International and domestic dynamics of intellectual property protection. Journal of World Business, 50(2), 284-293. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2014.10.005
  44. Khan, B. Z., Sokoloff, K. L. (2001). The early development of intellectual property institutions in the United States. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3), 233-246. DOI: 10.1257/jep.15.3.233
  45. Krajowa Administracja Skarbowa (2017). Ochrona praw własności intelektualnej. Retrieved May 03, 2020, from https://docplayer.pl/68055403-Ochrona-praw-wlasnosci-intelektualnej.
  46. Li, S. (2004). Why is property right protection lacking in China? An institutional explanation. Cali-fornia Management Review, 46(3), 100-115. DOI: 10.2307/41166223
  47. Liang, Z., Xue, L. (2010). The evolution of China’s IPR system and its impact on the patenting be-haviours and strategies of multinationals in China. International Journal of Technology Man-agement, 51(5), 469-496. DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2010.033815
  48. James, M., Lemon, F. (2013). Counterfeit goods in the UK: Who is buying what and why? Pricewa-terhouseCoopers.
  49. Marron, D. B., Steel, D. G. (2000). Which Countries Protect Intellectual Property? The Case of Software Piracy. Economic Inquiry, 38(2), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2000.tb00011.x
  50. Mercurio, B. (2012). The Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property in China since Acces-sion to the WTO: Progress and Retreat. China Perspectives [online] 1. Retrieved May 11, 2020, from http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/5795. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.5795
  51. Nill A., Shultz I. (1996). The scourge of global counterfeiting. Business Horizons, 39(6), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-6813(96)90035-X
  52. OECD (2008). The economic impact of counterfeiting and piracy. Retrieved January 11, 2020 from http://www.oecd.org/sti/38707619.pdf
  53. Phau, I., Teah, M. (2009). Devil wears (counterfeit) Prada: A study of antecedents and outcomes of attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(1), 15-27. DOI: 10.1108/07363760910927019
  54. Piquero, N. L. (2005). Causes and prevention of intellectual property crime. Trends in Organized Crime, 8(4), 40-61. DOI: 10.1007/s12117-005-1013-0
  55. Pogorzelski, P. (2017). Ochrona praw własności intelektualnej. Retrieved May 11, 2020 from https://www.uprp.pl/sympozjum-naukowe-ochrona-znakow-towarowych-i-wzorow-przemyslowych-w-unii-europejskiej/Lead14,58,18102,7,index,pl,text/
  56. Report on EU Customs enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights. Results at the EU border 2018 (2019). Publications Office of the European Union.
  57. Regulation (EU) No 608/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 concerning customs enforcement of intellectual property rights and repealing Council Regula-tion (EC) No 1383/2003, OJ L 181, 29.6.2013, 15-34.
  58. Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code. OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, 1-101.
  59. Rinnert, S. (2015). New European Regulation 608/2013 concerning combating counterfeit goods. World Customs Journal, 9(1), 37-42.
  60. Służba Celna (2014). Ochrona praw własności intelektualnej. Służba Celna.
  61. Speier, C., Whipple, J., Closs, D., & Voss, M. (2011). Global supply chain design considerations: Mitigating product safety and security risks. Journal of Operations Management, 29(7), 721-736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.06.003
  62. Staake, T., Thiesse F., & Fleisch E., (2012). Business strategies in the counterfeit market. Journal of Business Research 65, 658-665.
  63. Turkyilmaz C. A., Uslu A., (2014). The role of individual characteristics on consumers’ counterfeit purchasing intentions: research in fashion industry. Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics 1(3), 259-275. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.03.008
  64. Vida, I. (2007). Determinants of consumer willingness to purchase non-deceptive counterfeit prod-ucts. Managing Global Transitions 5(3), 25-270.
  65. Vrins O., (2018). Regulation (EU) No 608/2013 Concerning Customs Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights. Wolters Kluwer Law International. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpz166
  66. Wee, C.-H., Tan, S.-J., & Cheok, K.-H. (1995). Non-price determinants of intention to purchase counterfeit goods: An exploratory study. International Marketing Review, 12(6), 19-46.
  67. Wilson, J. M., Kinghorn, R. (2015). The global risk of product counterfeiting: Facilitators of the criminal opportunity. Center for Anti-Counterfeiting and Product Protection Backgrounder Se-ries. Michigan State University. Retrieved May 11, 2020 from http://a-capp.msu.edu/sites/default/files/PC_Opportunity_Backgrounder_02.18.15FINAL.pdf
  68. Widdowson, D.(2007). The Changing Role of Customs: Evolution or Revolution? World Customs Journal 1(1), 31-37.
  69. Yang, D., Fryxell G.E., & Sie, A.K. (2008). Anty-piracy effectiveness and managerial confidence: Insights from multinationals in China. Journal of World Business, 43(3), 321-339.
  70. Zhang J., Zhang R. Q., (2015). Supply chain structure in a market with deceptive counterfeits. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(1), 84-97.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.