Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2018)
5th AIB-CEE 2018 Conference Proceedings | 9th ENTRE 2018 Conference Proceedings (Special Issue)

Articles

When successor becomes the leader of international family business? – a case study from Poland

Published 2018-09-12

  • Alicja Hadryś-Nowak

Alicja Hadryś-Nowak
Poznań University of Economics and Business

Abstract

Leadership succession is a significant challenge for all family businesses. Despite this many family businesses do not have clear plans nor systematic processes for implementation trans-generational change (Fang et al, 2015). Family business owners beliefs that succession is natural process and successors became leaders naturally. If that was it, then more than 30% would survive the first generation, around 15% would survive to the third generation, and more than 3% would survive to the fourth generation (Vera and Dean, 2005). Although much research has been dedicated to family business succession and preparing successors there is still no in depth research showing the path needed to cross from successor to a true leader in family firm. The idea that a family business succession can have an impact on the financial structure and performance of a firm should be no surprise given that a business transfer is one of the most important and critical events in the life cycle of any family firm. Moreover, successions will gradually gain more importance in the next coming years because of the retirement of a substantial amount of business leaders. It is therefore important to study business transfers, as doing so can lead to more insights into best practices regarding how to carry out a succession and on the way in which the business is expected to change because of the transition event. Martin and Lumpkin (2004) find that in successive generations entrepreneurial orientation tends to diminish and give way to family orientation, as stability and inheritance concerns become the business's principal drivers. Central in the succession process is that the management of the family business end up in the hands of a competent and well-motivated successor. But there is still not clear what are what does it mean for successor and family business. We know that succession process has the potential to disrupt and even to destroy successful businesses, irrespective of their financial or market power (Bozer, Levin, Santora, 2017) but in some cases a succession, particularly when an successor is involved, can lead a family business to new markets, new ways of acting and thinking (Ward, 1987; Ibrahim et al. , 2001; Menendez-Requejo, 2005; Graves and Thomas, 2008). Assuming the topic of succession is one of the most critical challenges in the family business literature, this paper attempts to address the factors that act as driving forces for the successor to become a leader of international family businesses.

Keywords

family firms, succession leadership

PDF

References

  1. Banalieva, E.D. and Eddleston, K.A. (2011). Home-region focus and performance of family firms: the role of family vs non-family leaders. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 42 No. 8,1060-1072.
  2. Bednarz, J., Bieliński, T., Nikodemska-Wolowik, A.M., & Otukoya, A. (2017). Sources of the Com-petitive Advantage of Family Enterprises: An International Approach Focusing on China, Nige-ria and Poland. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(2), 123-142. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050207
  3. Bozer, G., Levin, L., Santora, J., (2017). Succession in family business: multi-source perspec-tive. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 24 Issue: 4, pp.753-774, https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-10-2016-0163
  4. Cabrera-Suárez, K., De Saá-Pérez, P., García-Almeida, D. (2001). The succession process from a resource- and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, Vol. 14 No. 1, 37-46.
  5. Campbell, K., Jerzemowska,M., 2017, Contested takeovers of family firms and socioemotional wealth: a case study", Baltic Journal of Management, Vol. 12Issue: 4, pp.447-463, https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-12-2016-0277
  6. Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz1, M. A., Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001.
  7. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Kellermanns, F. W., and Chang, E. P. C., (2007). Are family managers agents or stewards? An exploratory study in privately held family firms. Family Influences on Firms, 60(10), 1030–1038.
  8. Corbetta, G., and Salvato, C., (2004). Self-serving or self-actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: A commentary on “Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 28(4), 355–362.
  9. Cromie, S., Stevenson, B., & Monteith, D. (1995). The management of family firms: An empirical investigation.International Small Business Journal, I3( 4), 11-34.
  10. Davidsson, P., Achtenhagen, L., Naldi, L., (2010). Small firm growth. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 69-166.
  11. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., and Donaldson, L., (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of man-agement. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.
  12. Davis, P. S., & Harveston, P. D. (1998). The influence of the family on the family business succes-sion process: A multigenerational perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(3),31-53.
  13. Decker, C., Heinrichs, K., Jaskiewicz, P. and Rau, S.B. (2017), “What do we know about succession in family businesses? Mapping current knowledge and unexplored territory”, in Kellermanns, F.W. and Hoy,F. (Eds), The Routledge Companion to Family Business, Routledge, New York, NY, pp. 15-44.
  14. Doern, R., (2009). Investigating barriers to SME growth and development in transition environ-ments. International Small Business Journal, 27(3), 275-305
  15. Drakopoulou Dodd, S. and Dyck, B. (2015). Agency, stewardship, and the universal-family firm: a qualitative historical analysis. Family Business Review, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 312-331.
  16. Dunn, B. (1995). Success themes in Scottish family enterprises: Philosophies and practices through generations. Family Business Review, 8, 17-28.
  17. Eddleston, K. A., and Kellermanns, F. W., (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 545–565.
  18. Ensley, M.D. and Pearson, A.W. (2005). An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 267-284.
  19. Fang, H.C., Randolph, R.V.D.G., Memili, E. and Chrisman, J.J. (2015). Does size matter? The mod-erating effects of firm size on the employment of nonfamily managers in privately held fami-ly SMEs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 40 No. 5, pp. 1017-1039.
  20. Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., and Moyano- Fuentes, J., (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.
  21. Graves, C., & Thomas, J. (2008). Determinants of the internationalization pathways of family firms: An examination of family influence. Family Business Review, 21 (2), 151–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00119.x.
  22. Hambrick, D. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.
  23. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.
  24. Handler, W.C. (1994). Succession in family business: a review of the research. Family Business Review, Vol. 7 No. 2, 133-157.
  25. Ibrahim, A. B., & Ellis, W. (2003). Family business management, concepts and practices. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
  26. Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H., (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305– 360.
  27. Klein, S. B. (2007). Non-family executives in family businesses—A literature review. Electronic Journal of Family Business Studies (EJFBS), 1(1), 1796–9360.
  28. Kraus, S., Märk, S., and Peters, M., (2011). The influences of family on the everyday business of a family firm entrepreneur. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 12(1), 82–100.
  29. Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., and Lester, R. H., (2011). Stewardship or agency? A social embed-dedness reconciliation of conduct and performance in public family businesses. Organization Science, 22(3), 704–721.
  30. Lewandowska A., Więcek-Janka E., Hadryś-Nowak A., (2017). Raport z badania: Firma Rodzinna to Marka, Wyd. Instytut Biznesu Rodzinnego, Poznań.
  31. Loane, S., Bell, J. D., & McNaughton, R. (2007). A cross-national study on the impact of manage-ment teams on the rapid internationalization of small firms. Journal of World Business, 42(4), 489–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2007.06.009.
  32. Martin, W. L., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2004). From entrepreneurial orientation to family orientation: Generational differences in the management offamily businesses. Frontiers of entrepreneur-ship research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
  33. Menéndez-Requejo, S. (2005). Growth and internationalization of family businesses. International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, 1, 122–133.
  34. Morck, R., and Yeung, B., (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneur-ship: Theory & Practice, 27(4), 367–382.
  35. Morris, M.H., Williams, R.O., Allen, J.A. and Avila, R.A. (1997). Correlates of success in family business transitions. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 385-401.
  36. Pierce, J.L., Kostova, T. and Dirks, K.T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in or-ganizations. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 298-310.
  37. Reid, R., Dunn, B., Cromie, S., & Adams, J. (1999). Family Orientation in family firms: A model and some empirical evidence. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 6(1), 55-66.
  38. Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., and Dino, R. N., (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 473–490.
  39. Sharma, P., (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and direc-tions for the future. Family Business Review, 17(1), 1–36.
  40. Shukla, P. P., Carney, M., and Gedajlovic, E., (2014). Economic theories of family firms. In Melin, L., Nordqvist, M. and Sharma, P. (eds.), Sage Handbook of Family Business Studies Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd, pp. 100–118.
  41. Vera, C.F. and Dean, M.A. (2005). An examination of the challenges daughters face in family busi-ness succession. Family Business Review, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 321-345.
  42. Wach, K. (2017). Exploring the Role of Ownership in International Entrepreneurship: How does Ownership Affect Internationalisation of Polish Firms?. Entrepreneurial Business and Eco-nomics Review, (4), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050410

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.