Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017)
September 2017: Ekonomia międzynarodowa wobec współczesnych wyzwań

Articles

Impact of absorptive capacity and dominant logic on ERP assimilation in Chinese firms

https://doi.org/10.15678/PM.2017.0302.06

Published 2017-09-01

  • Farhan Khan
    • ,
  • Zhang Xuehe
    • ,
  • Fouzia Atlas
    • ,
  • Kashif Ullah Khan
    • ,
  • Adnan Pitafi
    • ,
  • Muhammad Usman Saleem
    • ,
  • Salman Khan

Farhan Khan
University of Science and Technology of China

Zhang Xuehe
University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei Anhui Province, China

Fouzia Atlas
University of Science and Technology of China 96 Jizhai Road, Hefei, Anhui Province

Kashif Ullah Khan
University of Science and Technology of China 96 Jinzhai Road, Hefei, Anhui Province

Adnan Pitafi
University of Science and Technology of China 96 Jinzhai Road, Hefei, Anhui Province

Muhammad Usman Saleem
University of Science and Technology of China 96 Jinzhai Road, Hefei, Anhui Province

Salman Khan
Hefei University of Technology Hefei, Anhui Province

Abstract

Firms belong to social communities that are experts in creation of new knowledge from environment. Knowledge that is generated from past experience and from environment can affect firm’s process positively. Processing knowledge assimilation in a better way, strong leadership abilities are needed. That can recognize knowledge from environment in the sense of opportunities and threats. In this article, we discuss the effect of absorptive capacity (ACAP) and dominant logic (DL) on enterprise resource planning (ERP). Dynamic capabilities (DC) of top managers to absorb the knowledge from the environment and assimilate it according to their needs that improve firm’s enterprise resource planning (ERP). Our main focus in this article is knowledge and how top-level managers routine that knowledge to get the future benefits for their respective firms. The model was adopted from past literature that shows the effect of absorptive capacity its subsets and dominant logic and its dimensions on ERP assimilation. For this study we examined the Chinese firms located in Hefei city (Anhui province) China. Hefei is one of the fastest developing and emerging economic hub in China. Employees from top level are the target group in this study. The results prove our hypotheses that absorptive capacity and dominant logic have a positive influence on ERP in Chinese firms, that not only increases the productivity and performance of the firm, but also helps in the allocation of resources and decision making processes to stand in the dynamic market and oppose any kind of threats. Our results showed positive correlation between all the variables.


Keywords

Absorptive capacity, dominant logic, ERP assimilation, Top management, dynamic capabilities

PDF

Author Biography

Farhan Khan

PhD Research Scholar

Zhang Xuehe

Associate Professor

School of Public Affairs

 

Fouzia Atlas

PhD Research Scholar

School of Public Affairs

Kashif Ullah Khan

PhD Research Scholar

Adnan Pitafi

PhD Research Scholar

School of Management

Muhammad Usman Saleem

Masters Research Scholar

School of Public Affairs

Salman Khan

Masters Research Scholar

References

  1. Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary Spanning Roles and Organization Structure. Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 217.
  2. Anatoliivna, V.O. (2013). Absorptive capacity in organizational theories: learning, innovation, managerial cognition, 190-198.
  3. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. http://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  4. Barr, P.S., & Huff, A.S. (1992). Cognitive change, strategic action, Strategic Management journal 13, 15-36.
  5. Baum, J.R., & Wally, S. (2003). Strategic decision speed and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24(11), 1107-1129. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.343
  6. Bettis, R.A., & Prahalad, C.K. (1995). The Dominant Logic: Retrospective and Extension. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 5-14. http://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(95)91621-0
  7. Bettls, R.A. (1995). the Dominant Logic : Retrospective and. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 5-14. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160104
  8. Bolton, P., & Harris, C. (1999). Strategic Experimentation. Econometrica, 67(2), 349-374. http://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00022
  9. Bosch, F.A.J., Jansen, J.J.P, & Volberda, H.W. (2005). Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity : How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter ?, Acadamey of Management, 48(6), 999-1015. http://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.19573106
  10. Bruton, G.D., Ahlstrom, D., & Obloj, K. (2008). Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies : the Research Go in the Future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 1-14. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00213.x
  11. Bruton, G.D., & Rubanik, Y. (2002). Resources of the firm, Russian high-technology startups, and firm growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(6), 553-576. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00079-9
  12. Calori, R., Johnson, G., & Sarnin, P. (1994). Ceos’ cognitive maps and the scope of the organization. Strategic Management Journal, 15(6), 437-457. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150603
  13. Chen, Y., Tang, G., Jin, J., Xie, Q., & Li, J. (2014). CEOs’ Transformational Leadership and Product Innovation Performance: The Roles of Corporate Entrepreneurship and Technology Orientation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 2-17. http://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12188
  14. Child, J., & Czegledy, A.P. (1996). Managerial Learning in the Transformation of Eastern Europe: Some Key Issues. Organization Studies. http://doi.org/10.1177/ 017084069601700202
  15. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. http://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  16. Cyert, R., & March, J. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 313. http://doi.org/10.2307/2228147
  17. Damanpour, F., & Aravind, D. (2012). Organizational structure and innovation revisited: From organic to ambidextrous structure. Handbook of Organizational Creativity. Elsevier Inc. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374714-3.00019-7
  18. Damanpour, F., Walker, R.M., & Avellaneda, C.N. (2009). Combinative Effects of Innovation Types and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Service Organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650-675. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x
  19. Dane, E., & Pratt, M.G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 33-54. http://doi.org/10.5465/ AMR.2007.23463682
  20. Dixon, S.E.A, & Day, M. (2007) “Leadership, administrative heritage and absorptive capacity”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 28 Issue: 8, pp.727-748.
  21. Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M.J. (2005). When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures?: Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Research Policy, 34(5), 615-639. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.017
  22. Eisenhardt, K.M., & Martin, J.A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities : What Are They ?, Strategic Management Journal, 1121, 1105-1121.
  23. Fichman, R.G., & Kemerer, C.F. (1997). The Assimilation of Software Process Innovation: An Organizational learning Perspective. Management Science, 1345-1363. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  24. Grant, R. (1988). “dominant logic,” relatedness and the link between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 9(6), 639-642. http://doi.org/10.1002/ smj.4250090610
  25. Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1967). Program change and organizational properties. A comparative analysis. AJS; American Journal of Sociology, 72(5), 503-519. http://doi.org/10.1086/224380
  26. Hambrick, D.C., & Mason, P.A. (1984). Echelons : of Reflection The Its Organization as Top a. Management, 9(2), 193-206. http://doi.org/10.2307/258434
  27. Hitt, M.A, Bierman, L., Shimizu, K., & Kochhar, R. (2000). Direct and Moderating Effects of Human Capital on Strategy and. Academy of Management Journal, (August), 44. http://doi.org/10.2307/3069334
  28. Hogarth, R.M. (2001). Educating intuition. Applied Cognitive Psychology (Vol. 17).
  29. Huang, Q., Davison, R.M., Liu, H., & Gu, J. (2008). The Impact of Leadership Style on Knowledge-Sharing Intentions in China. Journal of Global Information Management, 16(4), 67-91. http://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2008100104
  30. Huff, A.S. (1982). Industry influences on strategy reformulation. Strategic Management Journal, 3(2), 119-131. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250030204
  31. Jackson, S.E., & Dutton, J.E. (1988). Discerning threats and opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(3), 370-387. http://doi.org/10.2307/2392714
  32. Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993). Timid Choices and Bold Forecasts: A Cognitive Perspective on Risk Taking. Management Science, 39(1), 17-31. http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.1.17
  33. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Economentrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2), 263-292. http://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
  34. Keh, H.T., Foo, M.D., & Lim, B.C. (2002). Opportunity evaluation under risky conditions: The cognitive processes of entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(2), 125-148. http://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.00003
  35. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
  36. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 383-97. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  37. Kolvereid, L., & Obloj, K. (1994). Entrepreneurship in Emerging Versus Mature Economies: An Exploratory Survey. International Small Business Journal, 12(4), 14-27. http://doi.org/10.1177/0266242694124001
  38. Kortum, S., & Lerner, J. (2000). Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation. RAND Journal of Economics, 31(4), 674-692. http://doi.org/10.2307/2696354
  39. Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K.K., & Hua, Z. (2013). The impact of IT capabilities on firm performance: The mediating roles of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility. Decision Support Systems, 54(3), 1452-1462. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.016
  40. Lundberg, C.C. (1985). Whatever it takes – decision makers at work. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 868-870.
  41. Lyles, M.A. (2007). Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: An empirical examination in the Hungarian context. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(1), 3-18.
  42. March. G.J. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 71-87. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  43. March, J.G. (1996). Continuity and change in theories of organizational action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 278. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.515
  44. Meyer, K.E., & Peng, M.W. (2005). Probing Theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: Transactions, Resources, and Institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6), 600-621. http://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400167
  45. Miles, R.E., & Snow, C.C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546-562.
  46. Miles, R. & Snow, C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, structure and process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  47. Moskos, P. (1973). Observations on the Making of a Police Officer. Human Organization. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15868-6
  48. Mowery, D.C., & Oxley, J.E. (1995). Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: the role of national innovation systems. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 67-93. http://doi.org/Article
  49. Nadkarni, S., & Perez, P.D. (2007). Prior Conditions and Early International Commitment: The Mediating Role of Domestic Mindset. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(1), 160-176. http://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400248
  50. Nelson, R.R., & Winter, S.G. (2002). Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(2), 23-46. http://doi.org/10.1257/0895330027247
  51. Nisbett, R.E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Social Judgment. http://doi.org/10.1080/09658210244000603
  52. Obloj, T. et al. (2010a). Dominant Logic and Entrepreneurial Firms’ Performance in a Transition Economy. ET&P, 34(1), 151-170.
  53. Obloj, T. et al. (2010b). Dominant Logic and Entrepreneurial Firms’ Performance in a Transition Economy .
  54. Park, J.H., Suh, H.J., & Yang, H.D. (2007). Perceived absorptive capacity of individual users in performance of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) usage: The case for Korean firms. Information and Management, 44(3), 300-312. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.02.001
  55. Peng, M.W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.9416341
  56. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence approach, Hyper & Row, Newyork.
  57. Priem, R.L., & Butler, J.E. (2001). Is the RBV a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22-40. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4011938
  58. Purvis, R.L., Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R.W. (2001). The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations. Organization Science, 12(2), 117-135. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.117.10115
  59. Shen, K.N. (2008). Assimilation of enterprise resource planning ( ERP ): a multilevel model.
  60. Siggelkow, N. (2002). Evolution toward fit. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1), 125-159. http://doi.org/10.2307/3094893
  61. Siggelkow, N. (2002). Misperceiving Interactions Among Complements and Substitutes: Organizational Consequences. Management Science, 48(7), 900-916. http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.7.900.2820
  62. Simon, H.A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118. http://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
  63. Staw, B.M., Sandelands, L.E., & Dutton, J.E. (1981). Threat Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 501-524. http://doi.org/10.2307/2392337
  64. Talke, K. (2007). Corporate mindset of innovating firms: Influences on new product performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management – JET-M, 24(1-2), 76-91. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.01.005
  65. Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. (2000). Capabilities , Cognition , and Inertia : Evidence From Digital Imaging, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1161-1147.
  66. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207-232. http://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
  67. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science (New York, N.Y.), 185(4157 (Sept. 27, 1974)), 1124-31. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
  68. Uhlenbruck, K., Meyer, K.E., & Hitt, M.A. (2003). Organizational Transformation in Transition Economies: Resource-based and Organizational Learning Perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 40(2), 257-282. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00340
  69. Van De Ven, A.H., & Poole, M.S. (1995). Explaining Development and Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510-540. http://doi.org/10.2307/258786
  70. Van den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W., & de Boer, M. (1999). Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities. Organization Science, 10(5), 551-568. http://doi.org/ 10.1287/orsc.10.5.551
  71. Van Maanen, J. (1973). Observations on the making of policemen. Human Organization. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15868-6
  72. Venkatraman, N. (1989a). Strategic orientation of business enterprises: the construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science, 35, 942-962. http://doi.org/ 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  73. Venkatraman, N. (1989b). Strategic Orientation of Business Enterprises: The Construct, Dimensionality, and Measurement. Management Science, 35(8), 942-962. http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.942
  74. Verona, G. (1999). A resource-based view of product development. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 132-142. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.1580445
  75. Verona, G. (1999). A resource-based view of product development. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 132-142. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.1580445
  76. Volberda, H.W., Foss, N.J., & Lyles, M.A. (2010). PERSPECTIVE--Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field. Organization Science (Vol. 21). http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0503
  77. Von Krogh, G., Erat, P., & Macus, M. (2000). Exploring the Link between Dominant Logic and Company Performance. Creativity and Innovation Management, 9(2), 82-93. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.00160
  78. Walsh, J.P. (1995). Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane. Organization Science. http://doi.org/Article
  79. Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organization. In Sensemaking in Organizations (Vol. 13, pp. 109-131). Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/88135514
  80. Whyte, W.H.J. (1957). The Organization Man , Garden City , New York. Doubleday, 1956.
  81. Williamson, O.E. (1999). Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), 1087-1108. http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199912)20:12<1087::AID-SMJ71>3.0.CO;2-Z
  82. Wiltbank, R., Dew, N., Read, S., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2006). What to do next? The case for non-predictive strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 27(10), 981-998. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj
  83. Wirtz, B.W., Mathieu, A., & Schilke, O. (2007). Strategy in High-Velocity Environments. Long Range Planning, 40(3), 295-313. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2007.06.002
  84. Wright, P., et al. (1995). Strategic orientations, competitive advantage, and business performance. Journal of Business Research, 33(2), 143-151. http://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(94)00064-L
  85. Zahra, S.A. (1993). Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: A taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(4), 319-340. http://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90003-N
  86. Zahra, S.A. (2002). Absorptive Capacity : a Review , and Extension. Management, 27(2), 185-203. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4134351
  87. Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities – an Empirical-Test. Organization Science, 6(1), 76-92. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.1.76

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.