Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Understanding academic entrepreneurship: A signalling theory perspective

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the article is to apply signalling theory to explain researchers’ engagement with the industry and the barriers to collaboration.

Research Design & Methods: A mixed-mode study was carried out among scholars to explain the role of signalling on academic entrepreneurial engagement. The links between signalling and entrepreneurial engagement were assessed in the quantitative part using a sample of researchers from Poland. Moreover, qualitative research helped identify additional forms and barriers of signalling, which were not considered in the quantitative part. The IBM SPSS Statistics and Atlas.ti software was used in the data analysis.

Findings: In line with signalling theory, scientists’ signals were divided into three groups: individual and organizational characteristics, researchers’ actions, and third-party endorsements. Results show that the third-party endorsements expressed by researchers’ active involvement in professional organizations enhance entrepreneurial engagement. In the qualitative part the role of signalling through graduates and the problem of the signalling cost were identified.

Implications & Recommendations: Signalling sheds light on university-industry relationships through a new lens, explaining the matching process and cooperation barriers. Stimulating collaboration requires understanding the specific language of signals used by both scientists and business partners. Therefore, this research calls for action to strengthen scientists’ communication skills, more frequent interpersonal contacts with business representatives, and communication of scientific and non-scientific competencies.

Contribution & Value Added: The theoretical focus on signalling theory can advance the extensive research on academic entrepreneurship. This theory explains how actors are selected for cooperation and describes the mechanism of partner selection. It also enables the reinterpretation of previous research related to the characteristics and activities of researchers and their relevance for undertaking collaborations.

Keywords

signalling, university-industry relationships, academic entrepreneurship, knowledge market, academia

(PDF) Save

Author Biography

Marcin Olszewski

Marcin Olszewski PhD in Economics (2011, Poznan University of Economics and Business); Assistant Professor at the Department of International Economics in Poznan University of Economics and Business (Poland). His research interests include entrepreneurship, competitiveness and the tourism industry.


References

  1. Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2013). The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy, 42(2), 408-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.005
  2. Akerlof, G. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.
  3. Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U., & Woerter, M. (2008). University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: What university scientists think about cooperation with private enterprises. Research Policy, 37(10), 1865-1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.005
  4. Azman, N., Sirat, M., Pang, V., Lai Y.M., Govindasamy, A.R., & Din, W.A. (2019). Promoting university-industry collaboration in Malaysia: stakeholders’ perspectives on expectations and impediments. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 41(1), 86-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2018.1538546
  5. Backs, S., Günther, M., & Stummer, C. (2018). Stimulating academic patenting in a university ecosystem: an agent-based simulation approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 434-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9697-x
  6. Badgett, M.V.L. (2015). The public professor: How to use your research to change the world. New York University Press.
  7. Balconi, M., & Laboranti, A. (2006). University-industry interactions in applied research: The case of microelectronics. Research Policy, 35(10), 1616-1630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.018
  8. Becker, G.S, (1973). A Theory of Marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81(4), 813-846, https://doi.org/10.1086/260084
  9. Berman, J. (2008). Connecting with industry: bridging the divide. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 30(2), 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800801938762
  10. Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858-868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006
  11. Calcagnini, G., Giombini, G., Liberati, P., & Travaglini, G. (2015). A matching model of university-industry collaborations. Small Business Economics, 46(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9672-y
  12. Carrigan, M. (2016). Social media for academics. Sage.
  13. Clarysse, B., Tartari, V., & Salter, A. (2011). The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1084-1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.010
  14. Connelly, B.L., Certo, S.T., Ireland, R.D., & Reutzel, C.R. (2011). Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419
  15. Courtney, C., Dutta, S., & Li, Y. (2017). Resolving information asymmetry: Signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 265-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.122670
  16. Dasgupta, P., & David, P. (1994). Towards a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1
  17. D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?. Research Policy, 36(9), 1295-1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002
  18. D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z
  19. Fontana, R., Geuna, A., & Matt, M. (2006). Factors affecting university-industry R and D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy, 35(2), 309-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.12.001
  20. Giuliani, E., Morrison, A., Pietrobelli, C., & Rabellotti, R. (2010). Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy. Research Policy, 39(6), 748-761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.007
  21. Goethner, M., Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R., & Cantner, U. (2012). Scientists’ transition to academic entrepreneurship: economic and psychological determinants. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(3), 628-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.12.002
  22. Grover, V., & Davenport, T.H. (2001). General Perspectives on Knowledge Management: Fostering a Research Agenda. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045672
  23. Hardy, A., Vorobjovas-Pinta, O., & Eccleston, R. (2018). Enhancing knowledge transfer in tourism: An Elaboration Likelihood Model approach. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 37, 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.09.002
  24. He, V.F., von Krogh, G., Sirén, C., & Gersdorf, T. (2021). Asymmetries between partners and the success of university-industry research collaborations. Research Policy, 50(10), 104356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104356
  25. Kashyap, A., & Agrawal, R. (2019). Academia a new knowledge supplier to the industry! Uncovering barriers in the process. Journal of Advances in Management Research. 16(5), 715-733 https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-02-2019-0017
  26. Lai, I.K.W., & Lu, T.-W. (2016). How to improve university-industry collaboration in Taiwan’s animation industry? Academic vs. industrial perspectives. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(6), 717-732. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1141404
  27. Leitner, K.H., Bergner, S., & Rybnicek, R. (2020). The role of heads of departments in the commercialization of university research. Journal of Business Economics, 91(3), 353-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-020-01003-y
  28. Maietta, O.W. (2015), Determinants of university-firm R&D collaboration and its impact on innovation: a perspective from a low-tech industry. Research Policy, 44(7), 1341-1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.03.006
  29. McCartney, G., & Kwok, S.S. (2022). Closing the Gap between Hospitality Industry and Academia Research Agendas: An Exploratory Analysis Case Study. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008x.2021.2024782
  30. Mindruta, D. (2009). Markets for Research: A Matching Approach to University-Industry Research Collaborations. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1352472
  31. Mortensen, D. (1988). Wages, Separations, and Job Tenure: On-the-Job Specific Training or Matching?. Journal of Labor Economics, 6(4), 445-471.
  32. Murray, F., & Graham, L. (2007). Buying science and selling science: Gender differences in the market for commercial science. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 657-689. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm021
  33. Olszewski, M. (2021). Effect of Cooperation with Universities on the Innovativeness of Tourism Enterprises. Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, 28(1), 30-34. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjst-2021-0006
  34. Penin, J. (2005). Patent versus ex post rewards: a new look. Research Policy, 34(5), 641-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.005
  35. Perkmann, M., King, Z., & Pavelin, S. (2011). Engaging excellence? Effects of faculty quality on university engagement with industry. Research Policy, 40(4), 539-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.007
  36. Polidoro, F. (2013). The Competitive Implications of Certifications: The Effects of Scientific and Regulatory Certifications on Entries into New Technical Fields. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 597-627. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0459
  37. Reymert, I., & Thune, T. (2022). Task complementarity in academic work: a study of the relationship between research, education and third mission tasks among university professors. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09916-8
  38. Rohrbeck, R., & Arnold, H.M. (2006). Making University-Industry Collaboration Work – A Case Study on the Deutsche Telekom Laboratories Contrasted with Findings in Literature. The International Society for Professional Innovation Management Conference, Networks for Innovation. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1476398
  39. Rossi, F., Rosli, A., & Yip, N. (2017). Academic engagement as knowledge co-production and implications for impact: Evidence from Knowledge Transfer Partnerships. Journal of Business Research, 80, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.06.019
  40. Rudawska, I., & Kowalik, J. (2019). Towards university-business cooperation: Key drivers, barriers and modes. International Entrepreneurship Review, 5(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2019.0502.06
  41. Rybnicek, R., & Königsgruber, R. (2018). What makes industry-university collaboration succeed? A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Business Economics, 89(2), 221-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-018-0916-6
  42. Schartinger, D., Schibany, A., & Gassler, H., (2001). Interactive relations between universities and firms: empirical evidence for Austria. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011110207885
  43. Shen, Y. (2017). Identifying the key barriers and their interrelationships impeding the university technology transfer in Taiwan: a multi-stakeholder perspective. Quality & Quantity, 51(6), 2865-2884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0450-y
  44. Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L.E., & Link, A.N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1-2), 115-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006
  45. Sobaih, E.A., & Jones, E. (2015). Bridging the hospitality and tourism university-industry research gap in developing countries: The case of Egypt. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 15(3), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358415578188
  46. Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374. Retrieved April 7, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1882010
  47. Stiglitz, J.E. (2000). The Contributions of the Economics of Information to Twentieth-Century Economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1441-1478. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555015
  48. Stuart, T., & Ding, W. (2006). When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 97-144. https://doi.org/10.1086/502691
  49. Tartari, V., & Breschi, S. (2012). Set them free: scientists’ evaluations of the benefits and costs of university-industry research collaboration. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(5), 1117-1147. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dts004
  50. Thomas, R. (2012). Business elites, universities, and knowledge transfer in tourism. Tourism Management, 33(3), 553-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.06.009
  51. Thomas, R. (2018). Questioning the Assessment of Research Impact: Illusions, Myths and Marginal Sectors. Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95723-4
  52. Thomas, R., & Ormerod, N. (2017). The (almost) imperceptible impact of tourism research on policy and practice. Tourism Management, 62, 379-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.02.009
  53. Tijssen, R.J. (2006). Universities and industrially relevant science: Towards measurement models and indicators of entrepreneurial orientation. Research Policy, 35(10), 1569-1585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.025
  54. Welsh, R., Glenna, L., Lacy, W., & Biscotti, D. (2008). Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university-industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism. Research Policy, 37(10), 1854-1864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.010

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.