Standard of residency in Poland and selected European countries: Comparative analysis

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the paper is to present the standard of residency in the European Union countries, in particular against the background of the housing policy implemented in selected EU countries.

Research Design & Methods: Linear ordering and hierarchical clustering were used for statistical comparative analysis of studied countries. The data on the surroundings of the home and the financial capacity of respondents to maintain the home are taken into account. The data were taken from EQLS (European Quality of Life Survey) – the 4th-edition survey was held in 2016 and 2017.

Findings: The article shows significant differences in the standard of residency among European countries. In separate areas for assessing the housing situation, no country ranked first in all areas at the same time. In some cases, the position of a given country (e.g. Finland) is fundamentally different due to the considered area of standard of residency assessment. In terms of a multidimensional assessment of this standard, Poland is generally better rated than using commonly used housing situation indicators (e.g. the number of rooms per person).

Contribution & Value Added: An added value is the proposal to measure the housing situation of the population not only on the basis of measuring one or two indicators, but in a multidimensional approach with separate areas of assessment. This allows for a broader and deeper look at the problem of satisfying one of the basic human needs of living.

Keywords

social and economic policy, housing, quality of life, statistics, linear ordering, hierarchical clustering

Author Biography

Paweł Ulman

Associate Professor of Cracow University of Economics. His research interests include social statistics: income distribution, poverty, well-being, quality of life, economic discrimination, economic activity.

References

1. Anand, S., & Sen, A. (1997). Concepts of human development and poverty: a multidimensional per-spective. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
2. Aristei, D., & Bracalente, B. (2011). Measuring multidimensional inequality and well-being: Methods and Empirical Applications to Italian Regions. Statistica, LXXI (2), 239-266.
3. Atkinson, A.B., & Bourguignon, F. (1982). The comparison of multi-dimensional distributions of economic status. Review of Economic Studies, XLIX, 183-201.
4. Betti, G., & Verma, V. (1999). Measuring the degree of poverty in a dynamic and comparative con-text: A multi-dimensional approach using fuzzy set theory. In Proceedings from ICCS-VI: The Sixth Islamic Countries Conference on Statistical Sciences, 11, 289-301.
5. Fordham, R., Finlay, S., Gardner, J., Macmillan, A., Muldoon, C., Taylor, G., & Welch, G. (2018). Housing need and the need for housing. New York: Routledge.
6. Housing Europe (2019). A stronger focus on affordable and social housing in the 2019 CSRs. A hous-ing Europe Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.housingeurope.eu/resource-1303/a-stronger-focus-on-affordable-and-social-housing-in-the-2019-csrs.
7. Kolm, S.C. (1977). Multidimensional egalitarianism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91, 1-13.
8. Kwarciński, T., & Ulman, P. (2018). A hybrid version of well-being: an attempt at operationalization. Zarządzanie Publiczne, 4 (46), 30-49. DOI 10.15678/ZP.2018.46.4.03
9. Lis, P. (2011). Cele i instrumenty społecznej polityki mieszkaniowej. In: J. Dzieciuchowicz (Ed.), Współczesne przemiany środowiska mieszkaniowego – wybrane problemy (9-28). Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
10. Maasoumi, E. (1986). The measurement and decomposition of Multidimensional Inequality. Econ-ometrica, 54, 771-779.
11. Pittini, A., Koessl, G., Dijol, J., Lakatos, E., & Ghekiere, L. (2017). The state of housing in the EU 2017. A Housing Europe Review. Brussels: The European Federation of Public, Cooperative and Social Housing.
12. Salomon, M., & Muzioł-Węcławowicz, A. (Eds.) (2015). Mieszkalnictwo w Polsce. Analiza wybranych obszarów polityki mieszkaniowej. Warszawa: Habitat for Humanity Poland.
13. Seling, T., Milligan, V., Phibbs, P., & Thompson, A. (2008). Reconceptualizing housing need in the context of 21st century Australian housing policy. AHURI Positioning Paper, 110.
14. Smeeding, T., Saunders, P., Coder, J., Jenkins, S.P., Fritzell, J., Hagenaars, A., Hauser, R., & Wolfson M. (1993). Poverty, inequality and family living standards impacts across seven nations: The ef-fect of non-cash subsidies for health, education and housing. Review of Income and Wealth, 39, 229-256.
15. Soltes, E., & Ulman, P. (2015). The monetary and non-monetary aspects of poverty in Poland and Slovakia. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review 3 (1), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2015.030105
16. Stone, M.E. (1993). Human needs and housing affordability. In: M.E. Stone, Shelter poverty: New ideas on housing affordability (13-31). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
17. Treanor, D. (2015). Housing polices in Europe. M3 Housing Ltd.
18. Tsui, K.Y. (1995). Multidimensional generalizations of the relative and absolute inequality indices: The Atkinson-Kolm-Sen approach. Journal of Economic Theory, 67, 251-265.
19. Tsui, K.Y. (1999). Multidimensional inequality and multidimensional generalized entropy measure: an axiomatic derivation. Social Choice and Welfare, 16, 145-157.
20. UNCHSUD (2017). Habitat III Policy Papers: Policy Paper 10 Housing Policies. New York: United Nations – United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development.
21. Weymark, J.A. (2006). The Normative approach to the measurement of multidimensional inequali-ty. In: F. Farina, E. Savaglio (Eds.), Inequality and economic integration (303-328). London: Rou-tledge.
22. Wiśniewski, A., & Śleszyński, D. (1976). Koncepcja hierarchicznej struktury potrzeb w teorii Abraha-ma H. Maslowa. Studia Philosophiae Christianae, 12(2), 191-199.
23. Wójciaczyk, W. (2016). Analiza porównawcza sytuacji mieszkaniowej w wybranych krajach Unii Europejskiej. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie 3(951), 81-98. DOI: 10.15678/ZNUEK.2016.0951.0306
24. Ytrehus, S. (2000). Interpretation of housing needs? A critical discussion. Housing, Theory and Socie-ty, 17(4), 166-174. DOI: 10.1080/140360900300108591