Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Public entrepreneurship literature from 2010 to 2019: A systematic review

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2021.0701.04

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the article is to review some basic issues surrounding public entrepreneurship (PE), as it is perceived as a measure to improve the performance of public organizations.
Research Design & Methods: This article uses Systematic Assessment Quantitative Technique (SQAT) advanced by Australian researchers (Catherine Pickering and Jason Antony Byrne). It allows the reproduction of verifiable reviews, through geographical, theoretical, and methodological gaps identification in literature. 61 peer-reviewed PE articles from six quality academic databases were systematically reviewed based on the following headings: time and geographical distributions, article type (conceptual or empirical), theories, themes, and methods of data collection.
Findings: The analysis shows that large numbers of PE articles were published in 2016, with more publications in North America and Europe, while Africa has meagre publications. Most of PE articles are conceptually inclined and this suggests more empirical studies be conducted so as to have scientific knowledge of PE adoption. Besides, the study revealed that PE is mostly adopted by federal and state governments across the globe with little or no adoption at the local government level. Significant numbers of PE articles utilized one research method (the survey was dominantly used), future researchers can explore PE studies by merging more research methods to broaden the scope of PE.
Implications & Recommendations: This study provides a clear picture of what is been investigated and has provided guides for future researchers to widen the knowledge adoption of PE around the globe for better service provision by public stakeholders
Contribution & Value Added: The study systematically reviewed 61 peer-reviewed PE articles from six quality academic databases (Emerald, Elsevier, Sage, Springer, Taylor & Francis, and Wiley), thereby facilitating the understanding of PE and providing guides for future researchers of PE around the globe.

Keywords

public entrepreneurship, Systematic Assessment Quantitative Technique (SQAT), review

pdf

Author Biography

Ahmed Mohammed

PhD Student at Department of Entrepreneurship & Business Studies, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Niger State, Nigeria. Works at the Micro & Small Tax Audit Division of the Federal Inland Revenue Service of Nigeria, Minna Office, Niger State. His research interests focus on Economics, Public Entrepreneurship and Public Finance.

Umaru Mustapha Zubairu

Senior Lecturer, PhD in Accounting, Works at the department of Entrepreneurship & Business Studies, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Niger State, Nigeria. His research interests focus on accounting, entrepreneurship and business administration.

Emmanuel Olayiwola Oni

Professor of entrepreneurship, Works at the department of Entrepreneurship & Business Studies, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Niger State, Nigeria. His research interests focus on business administration, entrepreneurship and management.


References

  1. Ali, A., Irfan, S., & Salman, Y. (2019). An analysis of entrepreneurial perspective of public sector: A systematic literature review from 1990 to 2016. Business & Economic Review, 11(3), 113-142. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.22547/BER/11.3.5.
  2. Beyes, T. (2015). Fictions of the possible: Art, the city, and public entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(4), 445-449.
  3. Bikefe, G., Zubairu, U., Araga, S., Maitala, F., Ediuku, E., & Anyebe, D. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) by small and medium enterprises (SMEs): A Systematic Review. Journal of Small Business International Review, 4(1), 16-33. https://doi.org/10.26784/sbir.v4i1.243
  4. Carnes, C.M., Gilstrap, F. E., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Matz, J. W., & Woodman, R. W. (2019). Transforming a traditional research organization through public entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 62(4), 437-449.
  5. Cunningham, J. A., O’Reilly, P., Dolan, B., O’Kane, C., &Mangematin, V. (2016). Publicly funded principal investigators allocation of time for public sector entrepreneurship activities. Economia e PoliticaIndustriale, 43(4), 383-408.
  6. Ćwiklicki, M. (2017). Public entrepreneurship and its role in public value creation. Problemy Zarzqdzania, 15(66). DOI:10.7172/1644-9584.5
  7. de Andrade, C. R., Lopes, D.P.T., & Ckagnazaroff, I.B. (2016). Public entrepreneurship and quality of life: The perspectives of public entrepreneurs from the state of Minas Gerais (Brazil). In J. Leitão & H. Alves (Eds.), Entrepreneurial and Innovative Practices in Public Institutions, applying quality of life research (pp.41-58). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-32091-5_3
  8. Delabbio, D.J., & Zeemering, E.S. (2013). Public entrepreneurship and interlocal cooperation in county government. State and Local Government Review, 45(4), 255-267.
  9. Diefenbach, F. E. (2011). Entrepreneurship in the public sector. In F. E. Diefenbach (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in the Public Sector: when middle managers create public value (pp. 31-64). Germany: Gabler Research.
  10. Dhliwayo, S. (2017). Defining public-sector entrepreneurship: A conceptual operational construct. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 18(3), 153-163.
  11. Eleni, M., & Lorraine, J. (2019). Contextualising public entrepreneurship in Greek local government austerity. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(7), 1563-1579. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-11-2018-0749
  12. Fuller, C., &DelliSanti, D. (2017). Spillovers from public entrepreneurship: a case study. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy.6(1), 72-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-03-2016-0010
  13. Gofen, A., &Blomqvist, P. (2014). Parental entrepreneurship in public education: a social force or a policy problem?. Journal of Education Policy, 29(4), 546-569.
  14. Hayter, C.S. (2015). Public or private entrepreneurship? Revisiting motivations and definitions of success among academic entrepreneurs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(6), 1003-1015.
  15. Hayter, C.S., Link, A.N., & Scott, J.T. (2018). Public sector entrepreneurship. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 34(4), 676-694. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/gry014
  16. Kearney, C., &Meynhardt, T. (2016). Directing corporate entrepreneurship strategy in the public sector to public value: Antecedents, components, and outcomes. International Public Management Journal, 19(4), 543-572. DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2016.1160013
  17. Klein, P.G., Mahoney, J.T., McGahan, A.M., &Pitelis, C.N. (2010). Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship. European Management Review, 7(1), 1-15.
  18. Klein, P.G., Mahoney, J.T., McGahan, A.M., &Pitelis, C.N. (2013). Capabilities and strategic entrepreneurship in public organizations. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1), 70-91.
  19. Kouakou, T. G. (2018). Public Funds and Entrepreneurship: A Cognitive Economics Approach. Journal of Business & Economic Policy,5(2). DOI:10.30845/jbep.v5n2p9
  20. Lee, S.M., Hwang, T., &Choi, D. (2012). Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries, Management Decision, 50(1), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211194921
  21. Lerner, J. (2010). The future of public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital. Small Business Economics, 35(3), 255-264.
  22. Leyden, D.P. (2016). Public-sector entrepreneurship and the creation of a sustainable innovative economy. Small business economics, 46(4), 553-564.
  23. Lewis, K.V. (2014). Public narratives of female entrepreneurship: fairy tale or fact? Labour & Industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work, 24(4), 331-344.
  24. Liddle, J. (2016a). Introduction: public sector entrepreneurship: key issues, challenges and developments in theory and practice. United Kingdom, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S2040-724620160000006012/full/html.
  25. Liddle, J. (2016b). Conclusion: public entrepreneurship: the future research agenda. United Kingdom, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S2040-724620160000006020/full/html
  26. Liddle, J., & McElwee, G. (2019). Theoretical perspectives on public entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 25(6), 1308-1320. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-0219-0067
  27. Lindholst, A.C. (2019). Addressing public-value failure: remunicipalization as acts of public entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2019.1671192
  28. Lucas, D.S. (2017). Evidence-based policy as public entrepreneurship. Public Management Review, 20(11), 1602-1622. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1412115
  29. Lyon, F. (2016). Pushing enterprise and entrepreneurship in the delivery of rural public services: the case of education and health services. United Kingdom, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S2040-724620160000006009/full/html.
  30. Maranto, R. (2015). Did the teachers destroy the school? Public entrepreneurship as creation and adaptation. Journal of School Leadership, 25(1), 69-101.
  31. Marie, T.T. (2016). Public values as essential criteria for public entrepreneurship: Water management in France. Utilities Policy, 40, 162-169.
  32. Najmaei, A., &Sadeghinejad, Z. (2016). Toward a theory of business models and business modeling in public entrepreneurship. New Perspectives on Research, Policy & Practice in Public Entrepreneurship, 6, 77-102.
  33. Ndedi, A.A., &Antonites, A. (2015). Fostering Entrepreneurship in the Public Sector for Economic Development in Africa. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2575025
  34. Olivia, K. (2011). Difference between conceptual and empirical. Retrieved from https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-conceptual-and-vs-empirical/
  35. Paik, Y., Kang, S., & Seamans, R. (2018). Entrepreneurship, innovation, and political competition: How the public sector helps the sharing economy creates value. Strategic Management Journal, 40(4), 503-532.
  36. Pickering, C., & Byrne, J. (2013). The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(3), 534-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.841651
  37. Pitelis, C. (2013). Capabilities and strategic entrepreneurship in public organizations. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1), 70-91.
  38. Prelipcean, R.D., Islam, M.N., Peebles, A., Barakat, T., & Yao, J. (2014). The impact of public sector entrepreneurship in international education on skilled migration. United Kingdom, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S1479-3679(2013)0000023014/full/html
  39. Pugalis, L., Davidson, J., McLeay, F., & Round, A. (2016). Tough times, difficult choices and public entrepreneurship: Is sponsorship a winning solution? United Kingdom, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S2040-724620160000006002/full/html.
  40. Rivera, J.D., & Landahl, M.R. (2019). An environment conducive to bureaucratic innovation?: Exploring the potential for public entrepreneurship within FEMA. Journal of Urban Management, 8(2), 272-281.
  41. Rossiter, W., & Smith, D.J. (2017). Institutions, place leadership and public entrepreneurship: Reinterpreting the economic development of Nottingham. Local Economy, 32(4), 374-392.
  42. Seo, J., & Chung, S. (2012). Impact of entrepreneurship in the public sector: Cheonggye stream restoration project in the Seoul metropolitan city. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 34(1), 71-93.
  43. Smith, E. (2012). Explaining public entrepreneurship in local government organizations. State and Local Government Review, 44(3), 171-184.
  44. Strow, B., & Strow, C. (2018). Institutional barriers to productive public-sector entrepreneurship. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 7(4), 306-319.
  45. Wiseman, A.W. (2014). Internationally comparative approaches to innovation and entrepreneurship in education. United Kingdom, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S1479-3679(2013)0000023019/full/html.
  46. World Map. (2019). How Many Countries are in the World? Retrieved from http://www.worldatlas.com/ nations.htm.
  47. Xing, Y., Liu, Y., & Cooper, S.C.L. (2018). Local government as institutional entrepreneur: Public–private collaborative partnerships in fostering regional entrepreneurship. British Journal of Management, 29(4), 670-690.
  48. Xu, J., & Carey, R. (2015). Post2015 Global Governance of Official Development Finance: Harnessing the Renaissance of Public Entrepreneurship. Journal of International Development, 27(6), 856-880.
  49. Zampetakis, L.A., &Moustakis, V.S. (2010). An exploratory research on the factors stimulating corporate entrepreneurship in the Greek public sector. International Journal of Manpower, 31(8), 871-887.
  50. Zikou, E., Varsakelis, N., &Sarri, A.K. (2017). Does public sector crowd out entrepreneurship? Evidence from the EU regions. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior& Research. 24(4), 866-881.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

51-60 of 172

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.