Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025)
September

Articles

Managerial psychological gender and its impact on selected corporate behaviours

Published 2025-09-30

  • Wojciech Popczyk
    • ,
  • Alicja Winnicka-Popczyk
    • ,
  • Zaklina Jablonska

Wojciech Popczyk
University of Lodz

Alicja Winnicka-Popczyk
University of Lodz

Zaklina Jablonska
University of Lodz

Abstract

Objective: The article aims to determine the psychological gender of leaders of the fastest-growing enterprises and its impact on corporate entrepreneurial behaviour and social responsibility.

Research Design & Methods: We conducted empirical, quantitative research on the leaders of companies from the top of the Forbes Diamonds List to obtain knowledge about their personality traits and behaviours that contribute to business success. Methods: survey research (n=150) applying Bem’s BSRI gender role questionnaire, the concept of entrepreneurship orientation and the basic forms of corporate social responsibility (CSR). We also applied tests measuring the statistical significance of relationships between variables (Shapiro-Wilk, Ch2, V Kramer).

Findings: We identified three types of psychological gender culture among the leaders of the surveyed enterprises, the most numerous of which was mixed psychological culture. Androgynes (50 leaders) and unspecified cultures (46 leaders) constituted a total of 64% of the sample. With a few exceptions, there were no statistically significant differences in the entrepreneurial orientation, selected entrepreneurial behaviours, or involvement in responsible social activities of the identified gender cultures.

Implications & Recommendations: Women can and should perform managerial functions in business and achieve success, provided they acquire instrumental traits in the socialization process. The combination of instrumental and expressive traits in a person, especially in a manager, increases their adaptive intelligence and the probability of success regardless of biological sex. The postulate of gender diversity in top management is justified but in terms of psychological gender, not biological sex.

Contribution & Value Added: The research results show that the leaders of the fastest-growing companies have developed both instrumental and expressive features, which may indicate their high adaptive intelligence. Masculine culture differs from the others in a greater, statistically significant, feature: readiness for fierce competition and a lower declarative orientation towards climate protection, safe products, and concern for the local community in terms of social activity. The leaders’ cultural, entrepreneurial, and social profiles have additional cognitive value. The results contribute to the development of the following areas: managerial competences, role congruity theory, the theory of higher echelons, and social/psychological gender in business.

Keywords

androgyny, entrepreneurial orientation, social responsibility, AI, internationalization

(PDF) Save

Author Biography

Wojciech Popczyk

Associate professor at the Department of Strategy and Enterprise Value Management in the Faculty of Management at the University of Lodz. His research interests include: development strategies for family enterprises, international entrepreneurship, and soft management skills.

Alicja Winnicka-Popczyk

Associate professor at the Department of Corporate Finance Management in the Faculty of Management at the University of Lodz. Her research interests include: family entrepreneurship, finances of family enterprises, and financing innovations in family enterprises.

Zaklina Jablonska

Assistant at the Department of Strategy and Enterprise Value Management in the Faculty of Management at the University of Lodz. Her research interests include: business economics, business strategy, franchising, and entrepreneurship.

References

  1. Adner, R., & Helfat, C.E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1011-102. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.331
  2. Adusei, M., Akomea, S.Y., & Poku, K. (2017). Board and management gender diversity and financial performance of microfinance institutions. Cogent Business and Management, 4(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2017.1360030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2017.1360030
  3. Ali, M., Metz, I., & Kulik, C.T. (2015). The impact of work–family programs on the relationship between gender diversity and performance. Human Resource Management, 54(4), 553-576. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21631
  4. Ali, M., Shin D., & Yang, Y. (2023). The impact of management gender diversity on productivity: The contextual role of industry gender composition. Australian Journal of Management, 50(1), 32-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962231184664 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962231184664
  5. Bae, K.B., & Skaggs S. (2019). The impact of gender diversity on performance: The moderating role of industry, alliance network and family-friendly policies-Evidence from Korea. Journal of Management and Organization, 25(6), 896-913. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.45
  6. Bagshaw, M. (2004). Is diversity divisive? A positive training approach. Industrial and Commercial Training, 36(4), 153-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197850410542383 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00197850410542383
  7. Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2
  8. Bem, S.L. (1997). Androgynia psychiczna a tożsamość płciowa. In Ph.G. Zimbardo, F.L. Ruch (Eds.) Psychologia i życie (pp. 435-438). Warszawa: PWN.
  9. Bem, S.L., & Lewis, S.A. (1975). Sex-role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(4), 634-643. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077098
  10. Bem, S.L. (1974). The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215
  11. Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(2), 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1293-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1293-7
  12. Brown, D., Brown, D.L., & Anastasopoulos, V. (2002). Women on Boards: Not Just the Right Thing. But the “Bright” Thing. Ottawa: The Conference Board of Canada. Retrieved from https://www.conferenceboard.ca/product/women-on-boards-not-just-the-right-thing-but-the-bright-thing/ on May 27, 2024.
  13. Buss, D.M. (2019). Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429061417
  14. Cannella, Jr. A.A., & Monroe, M.J. (1997). Contrasting Perspective on Strategic Leaders: Toward a More Realistic View of Top Managers. Journal of Management, 23(3), 213-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(97)90033-7
  15. Carpenter, M.A., Geletkanycz, M.A., & Sanders, W.G. (2004). Upper Echelons Research Revisited: Antecedents, Elements, and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749-778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001
  16. Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity – femininity: An exception to a famous dictum?. Psychological Bulletin, 80(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035334
  17. Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
  18. Czyzowska, D. (2006). Płeć psychologiczna i jej związek z rozumowaniem moralnym. Psychologia Rozwojowa, 11(3), 49-58. Retrieved from https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/server/api/core/bitstreams/e4233d0e-9977-4d7b-a937-695a36c8306d/content on May 25, 2024.
  19. Deaux, K., & Lewis, L.L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 991-1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.991 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.46.5.991
  20. Dezso, C.L., & Ross, G.D. (2011). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072-1089. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1955 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1955
  21. Díaz-García, C., González-Moreno, A., & Sáez-Martínez, F. (2013). Gender Diversity Within R&D Teams: Its Impact on Radicalness of Innovation. Innovation, 15(2), 149-160. https://doi.org/ 10.5172/impp.2013.15.2.149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2013.15.2.149
  22. Dwyer, S., Richard, O.C., & Chadwick, K. (2003). Gender diversity in management and firm performance: The influence of growth orientation and organizational culture. Journal of Business Research, 56(12), 1009-1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00329-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00329-0
  23. Eagly, A.H. (1987). Sex differences in social behaviour: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  24. Eagly, A.H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50(3), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.3.145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.50.3.145
  25. Eagly, A.H. (1997). Sex differences in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1380-1383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1380.b DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.52.12.1380.b
  26. Eagly, A.H., & Karau, S.J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573-598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573
  27. Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 275-298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719
  28. Faulkender, P.J. (1991). Does gender schema mediate between sex-role identity and self-actualization?. Psychological Reports, 68(3), 1019-1029. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1991.68.3.1019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1991.68.3.1019
  29. Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. (2013). Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. Thousand Oaks, Londyn: SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529681451
  30. Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., Balti, S., & El Bouzaidi, S. (2019). To what extent do gender diverse boards enhance corporate social performance?. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(2), 343-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3529-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3529-z
  31. Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (10th anniversary ed.). New York: Basic Books.
  32. Gupta, S. (1996). Managerial effectiveness: Conceptual framework and scale development. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 31(3), 392-409. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27767425 on June 6, 2024.
  33. Hall, R.J., Workman, J.W., & Marchioro, C.A. (1998). Sex, task, and behavioral flexibility effects on leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2754 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2754
  34. Hambrick, D.C. (2007). Upper Echelons Theory: an Update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334-343. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
  35. Helfat, C., & Martin, J. (2015). Dynamic Managerial Capabilities: Review and Assessment of Managerial Impact on Strategic Change. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1281-1312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314561301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314561301
  36. Hisrich, R., & Brush, C. (1984). The woman entrepreneur: Management skills and business problems. Journal of Small Business Management, 22, 30-37. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1505240 on June 6, 2024.
  37. Hinton, P.R. (2016). The perception of people: Integrating cognition and culture. London: Routledge.
  38. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  39. Inesi, M.E., & Cable, D.M. (2015). When accomplishments come back to haunt you: The negative effect of competence signals on women’s performance evaluations. Personnel Psychology, 68(3), 615-657. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12083
  40. Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass”?. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1553-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1553-6
  41. Jonsson, P., & Carlsson, I. (2000). Androgyny and creativity: A study of the relationship between a balanced sex-role and creative functioning. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41(4), 269-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00198
  42. Jurkus, A.F., Park, J.C., & Woodard, L. (2011). Women in top management and agency costs. Journal of Business Research, 64(2), 180-186. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148-2963(09)00320-8 on June 6, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.12.010
  43. Jurma, W.E., & Powell, M.L. (1994). Perceived gender roles of manager and effective conflict management. Psychological Reports, 74(1), 104-107. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1994.74.1.104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1994.74.1.104
  44. Kark, R., Waismel-Manor, R., & Shamir, B. (2012). Does valuing androgyny and femininity lead to a female advantage? The relationship between gender-role, transformational leadership, and identification. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 620-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.12.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.12.012
  45. Katmon, N., Mohamad, Z.Z., Norwani, N.M., & Farooque, O.A. (2019). Comprehensive board diversity and quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2), 447-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3672-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3672-6
  46. Katz, R.L. (1974). Skills of an effective administrator. Harvard Business Review, 52, 90-102. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1974/09/skills-of-an-effective-administrator on 10 July, 2024.
  47. Kaymakam, G. (2023). The Impact of Gender Diversity within R&D Teams. Radboud: University Press.
  48. Klimicka, T.M., Sheppard, P.L., Wakefield, J.A., & Cross, H.J. (1987). Relationship between psychological androgyny and self-actualization tendencies. Psychological Reports, 61(2), 443-446. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1987.61.2.443 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1987.61.2.443
  49. Koch, A.J., D’Mello, S.D., & Sackett, P.R. (2015). A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 128-161. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036734 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036734
  50. Koenig, A.M., & Eagly, A.H. (2014). Extending role congruity theory of prejudice to men and women with sex-typed mental illnesses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2013.856789 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2013.856789
  51. Kor, Y., & Mesko, A. (2013). Dynamic Managerial Capabilities: Configuration and Orchestration of Top Executives’ Capabilities and the Firm’s Dominant Logic. Strategic Management Journal, 34(2), 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2000
  52. Krishnan, H.A., & Park, D. (2005). A few good women – on top management teams. Journal of Business Research, 58(12), 1712-1720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.09.003
  53. Lay, M. (1994). The value of gender studies to professional communication research. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 8(1), 58-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651994008001003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651994008001003
  54. Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47(4), 409-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002
  55. Lipinska-Grobelny, A., & Wasiak, K. (2010). Job satisfaction and gender identity of women managers and non-managers. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 23(2), 161-166. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10001-010-0015-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10001-010-0015-6
  56. Lott, B., & Maluso, D. (1993). The social learning of gender. In A.E. Beall & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 99-123). New York: The Guilford Press.
  57. Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172. https://doi.org/10.2307/258632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258632
  58. Mandal, E. (2000). Podmiotowe i interpersonalne konsekwencje stereotypów związanych z płcią. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
  59. Maxfield, S., Shapiro, M., Gupta, V., & Hass, S. (2010). Gender and risk: Women, risk taking and risk aversion. Gender in Management, 25(7), 586-604. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542411011081383 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17542411011081383
  60. May, A., & Spangenberg, J.J. (1998). Androgyny and coping in men with a managerial orientation. South African Journal of Psychology, 27(4), 244-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124639702700407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/008124639702700407
  61. Miller, T., & Triana, M.C. (2009). Demographic Diversity in the Boardroom: Mediators of the Board Diversity-Firm Performance Relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 755-786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00839.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00839.x
  62. Moir, A., & Jessel, D. (1992). Brain sex: Real Difference Between Men and Women. New York: Delta.
  63. Moscu, R.G. (2013). The impact of gender and age diversity on company performance. Knowledge Horizons – Economics, 5(4), 215-219. Retrieved from https://orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/ 2013_khe_4_pdf/khe_vol_5_iss_4_215to219.pdf on July 14, 2024.
  64. Nakagawa, Y., & Schreiber, G.M. (2014). Women as drivers of Japanese firms’ success: The effect of women managers and gender diversity on firm performance. Journal of Diversity Management, 9(1), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.19030/jdm.v9i1.8620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/jdm.v9i1.8620
  65. Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). Women Directors and Board Strategic Decision Making: the Moderating Role of Equality Perception. European Management Review, 7(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1057/emr.2009.27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/emr.2009.27
  66. Norlander, T., Erixon, A., & Archer, T. (2000). Psychological androgyny and creativity: Dynamics of gender-role and personality trait. Social Behavior and Personality, 28(5), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2000.28.5.423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2000.28.5.423
  67. Østergaard, C., Timmermans, B., & Kristinsson, K. (2011). Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Research Policy, 40(3), 500-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.004
  68. Owuamalam, C.K., & Zagefka, H. (2014). On the psychological barriers to the workplace: When and why meta-stereotyping undermines employability beliefs of women and ethnic minorities. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(4), 521-528. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037645 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037645
  69. Padavic, I., Ely, R.J., & Reid, E.M.(2020). Explaining the Persistence of Gender Inequality: The Work–Family Narrative as a Social Defense against the 24/7 Work Culture. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(1), 61-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219832310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219832310
  70. Peng, X., Qi, T., & Wang, G. (2022). Board Gender Diversity, Corporate Social Disclosures, and National Culture. SAGE Open, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221130946 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221130946
  71. Peng, X., Yang, Z., Shao, J., & Li, X. (2021). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility disclosure of multinational corporations. Applied Economics, 53(42), 4884-4898. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00036846.2021.1910620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1910620
  72. Porter, M. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1
  73. Powell, G.N., & Butterfield, D.A. (2015). The role of androgyny in leader prototypes over four decades. Gender in Management, 30(1), 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-07-2013-0082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-07-2013-0082
  74. Powell, G.N., Butterfield, D.A., & Jiang, X. (2021). “The “Good manager” Over Five Decades: Towards an Androgynous Profile?. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 36(6), 714-730. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/GM-01-2021-0023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-01-2021-0023
  75. Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 327-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2613-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2613-5
  76. Richard, O.C., Kirby, S.L., & Chadwick, K. (2013). The impact of racial and gender diversity in management on financial performance: How participative strategy making features can unleash a diversity advantage. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(13), 2571-2582. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09585192.2012.744335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.744335
  77. Ruble, D.N., Martin, C.L., & Berenbaum, S. (2006). Gender development. In W. Damon, N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Personality and social development (pp. 858-932). New York: Wiley Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0314
  78. Ruigrok, W., Peck S., & Tacheva, S. (2007). Nationality and gender diversity on Swiss corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 546-557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00587.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00587.x
  79. Ruiz-Jiménez, J.M., & del Mar Fuentes-Fuentes, M. (2016). Management capabilities, innovation, and gender diversity in the top management team: An empirical analysis in technology-based SMEs. Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2015.08.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2015.08.003
  80. Rupavataram, S.R. (2017). Shouldn’t competence and compassion coexist in medical professionals? A study of psychological androgyny in doctors. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 8(4), 458-462. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2017.00385.0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2017.00385.0
  81. Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in: Women, Work and the Will to Lead. New York: Alfred Knopf.
  82. Sargent, A.G. (1979). The androgynous manager. Planning Review, 7(6), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb053897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb053897
  83. Schein, V.E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(2), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037128
  84. Schwab, A., Werbel, J.D., Hofmann, H., & Henriquesa, P.L. (2016). Managerial gender diversity and firm performance: An integration of different theoretical perspectives. Group and Organization Management, 41(1), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115588641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115588641
  85. Seto-Pamies, D. (2015). The relationship between women directors and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6), 334-345. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1349
  86. Skelly, J., & Johnson, J.B. (2011). Glass ceilings and great expectations: Gender stereotype impact on female professionals. Southern Law Journal, 21, 59-70. Retrieved from https://southern-law-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/2011_1/04_slj_volume_21_2011_spring_skelly_glass_ceilings.pdf on August 2, 2024.
  87. Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), 569-593. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400610702160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400610702160
  88. Srivastava, N., & Nair, S.K. (2011). Androgyny and Rational Emotive Behaviour as Antecedents of Managerial Effectiveness. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 15(4), 303-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/097226291101500401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/097226291101500401
  89. Sternberg, R.J. (2020). Rethinking what we mean by intelligence. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(3), 36-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720970700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720970700
  90. Tabassum, N., & Nayak, B.S. (2021). Gender Stereotypes and Their Impact on Women’s Career Progressions from a Managerial Perspective. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 10(2), 192-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277975220975513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2277975220975513
  91. Terjesen, S., Couto, E.B., & Francisco, P.M. (2016). Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. Journal of Management & Governance, 20, 447-483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-014-9307-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-014-9307-8
  92. Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women Directors on Corporate Boards: From Tokenism to Critical Mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0815-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0815-z
  93. Triana, M.C., Song, R., Um, C.T., & Huang, L. (2024). Stereotypical Perception in Management: A Review and Expansion of Role Congruity Theory. Journal of Management, 50(1), 188-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231180836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231180836
  94. Way, A., & Marques, J. (2013). Management of gender roles: marketing the androgynous leadership style in the classroom and the general workplace. Organization Development Journal, 31(2), 82-94. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263091335_Management_of_Gender_Roles_Marketing_the_Androgynous_Leadership_Style_in_the_Classroom_and_the_General_Workplace on August 20, 2024.
  95. Williams, M.J., & Tiedens, L.Z. (2016). The subtle suspension of backlash: A meta-analysis of penalties for women’s implicit and explicit dominance behaviour. Psychological Bulletin, 142(2), 165-197. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000039
  96. Woodhill, B.M., & Samuels, C.A. (2023). 21st Century Neo-Androgyny: What Is Androgyny Anymore and Why We Should Still Care. Psychological Reports, 126(5), 2322-2344. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941221076759 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941221076759
  97. Zuckerman, M. (1991). Psychobiology of Personality. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004850-199100640-00009
  98. Zukowska, M. (2006). Wartości męskie i kobiece w polskim zaprogramowaniu kulturowym. Racjonalista. Retrieved from https://www.racjonalista.pl/kk.php/s,4755 on May 20, 2024.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 156

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.