Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026)
June 2026

Articles

Entrepreneurial leadership in Polish small and medium-sized enterprises through appreciative inquiry: Evidence from qualitative interviews

Published 2026-06-30

  • Joanna Wójcik-Chodorowska
    • ,
  • Łukasz Sułkowski
    • ,
  • Robert Seliga

Joanna Wójcik-Chodorowska
WSB University

Łukasz Sułkowski
Jagiellonian University

Robert Seliga
WSB University

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this article is to identify and understand the strengths-based mechanisms through which entrepreneurs enact entrepreneurial leadership in post-transition economies. We know that entrepreneurship research in post-transition economies often diagnoses barriers and deficits. However, we know far less about the strengths-based mechanisms through which entrepreneurs enact entrepreneurial leadership. In, this study, we explored entrepreneurial leadership in Polish small and medium enterprises through an appreciative inquiry lens, focusing on enabling experiences, resources, and aspirations.

Research Design & Methods: We conducted eighteen semi-structured appreciative inquiry interviews with entrepreneurs (owners and owner-managers) from three Polish regions and three sectors (services, trade, and technology). We transcribed and analysed interviews (June-July 2025) using a hybrid thematic analysis (deductive-inductive) supported by NVivo, with attention to the discovery and dream phases of the appreciative inquiry cycle.

Findings: We identified five interconnected mechanisms of entrepreneurial leadership: (1) resilience-as-learning after failure and crisis; (2) a gradual shift towards greater community legitimacy of entrepreneurship, although not uniformly across sectors; (3) relational leadership built through networks that often compensate for uneven formal institutional support; (4) proactive, place-based institutional co-creation with local stakeholders; and (5) future orientation towards innovation and sustainability, which is most visible in large-city and technology contexts.

Implications & Recommendations: For educators and support organisations, appreciative inquiry offers a practical way to cultivate reflective, opportunity-oriented leadership competences. For local and national policymakers, the results indicate that strengthening peer networks and creating accessible, place-sensitive support infrastructures can amplify existing entrepreneurial strengths.

Contribution & Value Added: The study advances entrepreneurial leadership scholarship by proposing a micro-meso-macro framework that links psychological resources, social capital, and institutional co-creation in a post-transition context. Methodologically, it demonstrates how appreciative Inquiry complements deficit-oriented entrepreneurship research by making visible the generative narratives and practices through which entrepreneurs sustain and develop their ventures.

Keywords

appreciative inquiry, entrepreneurial leadership, Poland, qualitative interviews, social capital, resilience

(PDF) Save

Author Biography

Joanna Wójcik-Chodorowska

Department of Management, WSB University, Poland. Her research interests include entrepreneurship, organizational leadership, organizational behaviour, and the social and cultural determinants of organizational functioning.

Łukasz Sułkowski

Department of Higher Education Institution Management, Institute of Public Affairs, Jagiellonian University, Poland. His research interests include organization and management theory, qualitative research methodology, critical management studies, and contemporary transformations of organizations, with a particular focus on leadership, entrepreneurship, and higher education management.

Robert Seliga

Department of Management, WSB University, Poland. His research interests include entrepreneurship studies, organizational leadership, and institutional and regional conditions of enterprise development, with additional focus on management in higher education.

References

  1. Audretsch, D., Belitski, M., Chowdhury, F., & Desai, S. (2021). Necessity or opportunity? government size, tax policy, corruption, and implications for entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 58(4), 2025-2042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00497-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00497-2
  2. Berger, P.L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Penguin Books.
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  4. Bushe, G.R. (2011). Appreciative inquiry: Theory and critique. In D. M. Boje, B. Burnes, & J. Hassard (Eds.), The Routledge companion to organizational change (pp. 87-103). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203810279.ch6
  5. Bushe, G.R. (2013). Appreciative Inquiry Model. In E. H. Kessler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of management theory (pp. 41-44). SAGE Publications.
  6. Cameron, K.S., & Caza, A. (2004). Contributions to the discipline of positive organizational scholarship. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 731-739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203260207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203260207
  7. Cameron, K.S., Dutton, J.E., & Quinn, R.E. (Eds.). (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. Berrett-Koehler
  8. Cooperrider, D.L. (1990). Positive image, positive action: The affirmative basis of organizing. In S. Srivastva & D.L. Cooperrider (Eds.), Appreciative management and leadership: The power of positive thought and action in organizations (pp. 91-125). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  9. Cooperrider, D.L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In W. A. Pasmore & R. W. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 1, pp. 129-169). JAI Press.
  10. Cooperrider, D.L., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative Inquiry: A Positive Revolution in Change. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  11. Cooperrider, D.L., Whitney, D., & Stavros, J.M. (2008). The appreciative inquiry handbook: For leaders of change (2 ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  12. Derlukiewicz, N., Mempel, Śnieżyk, A., Pilewicz, T., & Godlewska, M. (2021). Bottom up initiatives undertaken by local governments to support entrepreneurship. Energies, 14(19), 6328. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196328
  13. Godlewska, M., & Morawska, S. (2020). Development of local and regional entrepreneurship – which institutions matter? Evidence from Poland. Economic Research – EkonomskaIstraživanja, 33(1), 1017-1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1553680 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1553680
  14. Grant, S., & Humphries, M. (2006). Critical evaluation of appreciative inquiry: bridging an apparent paradox. Action Research, 4(4), 401-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750306070103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750306070103
  15. Statistics Poland (2010, 10 January). Miasta w liczbach 2009: Notatka informacyjna. Wyniki badań GUS. Departament Badań Regionalnych i Środowiska, Urząd Statystyczny w Poznaniu, 1-4. Retrieved from https://stat.gov.pl/cps/rde/xbcr/gus/oz_miasta_w_liczbach_2009_notatka_infor.pdf on May 10, 2025.
  16. Lewis, J., & Van Tiem, D. (2004). Appreciative inquiry: A view of a glass half full. Performance Improvement, 43(8), 19-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140430807
  17. Li, M., Makino, S., Luo, L., & Jiang, C. (2022). Entrepreneurial passion and organizational innovation: the moderating effects of events and the competence to exploit events. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 549-582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09853-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09853-6
  18. Markowska-Przybyła, U. (2022). Internal social capital of enterprises in Poland. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, (159), 255-268. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2022.159.20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2022.159.20
  19. Michael, S. (2005). The promise of appreciative inquiry as an interview tool for field research. Development in Practice, 15(2), 222-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520500042094 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520500042094
  20. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.
  21. Młyński, J., Sułkowski, Ł., Seliga, R,. Wójcik-Chodorowska J., & Jung-Konstanty, S. (2024). The Role of Social Security and Appreciative Inquiry in the Work of a Social Service Manager. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 12(4), 139-155. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL12_NO4_8
  22. Mwita, K.M. (2022). Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research in social science studies. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 11(6), 618-625. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i6.1920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i6.1920
  23. OECD. (2010). OECD studies on SMEs and Entrepreneurship and Innovation. OECD Publishing.
  24. OECD. (2025). Strengthening FDI and SME Linkages in Poland. OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/cb08eb93-en
  25. Oranga, J., & Matere, A. (2023). Qualitative research: Essence, types and advantages. Open Access Library Journal, 10(12), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111001
  26. Osowska, R. (2019). Exploring the Attitudes Towards Entrepreneurship in a Transforming Society. The Case of Poland. Management International, 23(5), 26-35. https://doi.org/10.7202/1066709ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1066709ar
  27. Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości (PARP). (2022). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor- Poland 2022.
  28. Pyrkosz-Pacyna, J., Nawojczyk, M., & Synowiec-Jaje, L. (2021). Entrepreneurial resilience in the COVID 19 crisis: A qualitative study of micro and small entrepreneurs in Poland. Polish Sociological Review, 216(4), 571-592. https://doi.org/10.26412/psr216.08
  29. Rahman, M.S. (2017). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “testing and assessment” research: A literature review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102-112. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102
  30. Reed, J. (2007). Appreciative inquiry: Research for change. SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983464
  31. Renko, M., El Tarabishy, A., Carsrud, A.L., & Brännback, M. (2015). Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 54-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12086
  32. Rogalska, E. (2018). Multiple-criteria analysis of regional entrepreneurship conditions in poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(4), 707-723. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.034
  33. Smuniewski, C., Urych, I., & Zanini, A. (2021). The principles of economic transformation in Poland after 1989 according to President Lech Wałęsa: A research in economics and security studies. European Research Studies Journal, 24(2), 1227-1242. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/2185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/2185
  34. Sułkowski, Ł., & Lenart-Gansiniec, R. (2021). Epistemologia, metodologia i metody badań w naukach o zarządzaniu i jakości. Społeczna Akademia Nauk
  35. Sułkowski, Ł., & Ulatowska , R. (2025). Entrepreneurial strategies for national large language models: A comparative study of Bielik and PLLuM in advancing Poland’s digital sovereignty. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 13(4), 165-184. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2025.130409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2025.130409
  36. Sułkowski, Ł., Wójcik-Chodorowska, J., Jarosz, K., & Jung-Konstanty, S. (2025). Public value management, deinstitutionalization, and personalized social services in local communities. Journal of International Studies, 18(2), 50-74. http://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2025/18-2/3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2025/18-2/3
  37. Whitney, D., & Trosten-Bloom, A. (2010). The power of appreciative inquiry: A practical guide to positive change (2nd ed.). Berrett-Koehler.
  38. Wojarska, M. (2021). The instruments of stimulating entrepreneurship by local governments in Poland. Entrepreneurial Frontiers – From Leadership to Social Business. IBIMA Publishing. Retrieved from https://ibimapublishing.com/p-articles/37LEAD/2021/3771821/ on May 11, 2025.
  39. Woodfield, P., Woods, C., & Shepherd, D. (2017). Appreciating entrepreneurship: a new approach for field research. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 7(2), 20160027. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2016-0027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2016-0027
  40. Wójcik, P., & Ciszewska-Mlinarič, M. (2020). Explorative and exploitative choices in response to initiative failure: study of entrepreneurs and managers. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(3), 83-99. https://doi.org/10.15678/eber.2020.080305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080305
  41. Xing, Y., Liu, Y., & Cooper, C. L. (2018). Local government as institutional entrepreneur: public-private collaborative partnerships in fostering regional entrepreneurship. British Journal of Management, 29(4), 670-690. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12282
  42. Zarębski, P., Czerwińska-Jaśkiewicz, M., & Klonowska-Matynia, M. (2022). Innovation in peripheral regions from a multidimensional perspective: evidence from the middle pomerania region in Poland. Sustainability, 14(14), 8529. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148529
  43. Ziemiański, P. (2018). The perception of an entrepreneur’s structural, relational and cognitive social capital among young people in Poland: An exploratory study. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 14(1), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.7341/20181416 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7341/20181416
  44. Zygmunt, J. (2025). Entrepreneurs’ network characteristics and their perceived success in raising equity: Evidence from the business angel market. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 13(1), 41-60. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2025.130103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2025.130103
  45. Żuk, P., & Żuk, P. (2021). On the socio-cultural determinants of polish entrepreneurs’ attitudes towards the development of renewable energy: business, climate skepticism ideology and climate change. Energies, 14(12), 3418. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14123418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14123418
  46. Żukowska, B. (2025). The impact of social capital on the economic performance of Polish family businesses. International Entrepreneurship Review, 11(2), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2025.1102.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2025.1102.01

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

31-40 of 224

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.