Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

HR practices on diversity: Evidence from the US pharmaceutical companies’ subsidiaries in CEE region

Abstract

This paper investigates the diversity management  in pharmaceutical multinational companies and specifically of their official entities in Central and Eastern Europe.  It argues that diversity management measures vary between headquarters and subsidiaries as the country regulations on diversity are different across Europe. Data was gathered on diversity management through secondary information of top ten US-based pharmaceutical companies’ corporate websites (listed in Fortune 2000) and their code of conducts. The covered US pharmaceutical companies possess operations in the CEE region. It is employed descriptive statistics showing that the local subsidiaries in Central and Eastern Europe refer mainly to the HR practices and code of conduct of the parent company without having their own code of conduct. The results of the paper demonstrate that diversity management measures differ widely between headquarters and subsidiaries and that many of the diversity dimensions (e.g. visible and non-visible dimensions e.g. gender, age, sex, sexual orientation, disability, nationality, ethnicity, minorities, religion and education background) are not covered at all in the subsidiaries in the CEE region.

Keywords

diversity, dimensions, US pharmaceutical companies, HR practices

PDF

Author Biography

Sebastian Bobowski



References

  1. Beamond, M. T., Farndale, E., & Härtel, C. E. (2016). MNE translation of corporate talent man-agement strategies to subsidiaries in emerging economies. Journal of World Business, 51(4), 499-510.
  2. Benschop, Y., Holgersson, C., Van den Brink, M., & Wahl, A. (2015). Future challenges for practices of diversity management in organizations. Handbook for Diversity in Organizations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 553-574.
  3. Eagan, M., and Bendick, M. (2001), ‘Workforce Diversity Initiatives of U.S. Multinationals in
  4. Europe,’ Research Report. Washington, DC: Bendick and Egan Economic Consultants.
  5. Harris, K. L. (2015). Work Force Diversity Management Strategy: A Catalyst for Global Marketing Competitiveness. In Proceedings of the 1998 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference (pp. 241-242). Springer International Publishing.
  6. Jackson, S.E., 1992. Diversity in the workplace: Human resources initiatives. Guilford Press.
  7. Kemper, L. E., Bader, A. K., & Froese, F. J. (2016). Diversity management in ageing societies: A comparative study of Germany and Japan. management review. Socio-economic Studies, 27(1), 29-49.
  8. Kirton, G., & Greene, A. M. (2015). The dynamics of managing diversity: A critical approach. Routledge.
  9. Mannix, E., & Neale, M.A. (2005). What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6, 31-55.
  10. Morden, T. (2016). Equality, Diversity and Opportunity Management: Costs, Strategies and Leader-ship. Routledge.
  11. Mortimore, H. (2014). International Handbook on Diversity Management at Work: Country Per-spectives on Diversity and Equal Treatment. Personnel Review.
  12. Mustafa Ozbilgin, Ahu Tatli, Karsten Jonsen (2015): Gobal Diversity Management. An Evidenc-Based Approach. Pallgrave – Macmillan, 2nd Edition.
  13. Nishii, Lisa/Özbilgin, Mustafa (2009): Global diversity management: towards a conceptual frame-work. International Journal of Human Resource Management. Vol. 18, Nr. 11, 1883-1894
  14. Swyngedouw, Erik (1997a) 'Neither Global nor Local: "Glocalization" and the Politics of Scale', in Kevin R. Cox (ed.) Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local, New York: Guilford Press, pp. 137-166
  15. Syed, Jawad/Özbilgin, Mustafa (2009): A relational framework for international transfer of diversi-ty management practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management. Vol. 20, Nr. 12, 2435-3453
  16. Verma, A. (2014). Valuing Diversity: Strategies and implications for organizational success. Pres-tige International Journal of Management and Research, 7(2/1), 31.
  17. Walgenbach, Peter/Meyer, Renate E. (2008): Neoinstitutionalistische Organisationstheorie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.