Linking relational capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation of an organization


Objective: The aim of the paper is to examine relational capabilities of an organization in the context of entrepreneurial orientation and to identify potential interconnection between them.

Research Design & Methods: The sample consists of 363 small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) representing both service and manufacturing (high- and low tech) industries. The correlation analysis was employed to test the associations among variables. The variables were dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation (i.e., risk-taking, innovativeness, and proactiveness), dimensions of relational capability (i.e., the intensity of inter-organizational relations, resources involved in inter-organizational relations, and management of inter-organizational relations), and firm’s performance.

Findings: The findings show that all dimensions of relational capabilities are associated strongly with risk-taking, while their associations with innovativeness and proactiveness are weak, however statistically significant. The access to external resources, their utilization, and sharing their resources are the most important aspects of relational capabilities. All variables are significantly correlated with performance.

Contribution & Value Added: The study’s results imply that relational capabilities may play an important role in pursuing entrepreneurial opportunities. The findings confirm the importance of behaviours focused on sharing resources (including knowledge). This observation has a practical implication for entrepreneurs.


relational capabilities; inter-organizational cooperation; entrepreneurial orientation; risk-taking; innovativeness; proactiveness

Anderson, B.S., Kreiser, P.M., Kuratko, D.F., Hornsby. J.S., & Eshima. Y. (2015). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), 1579-1596. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2298

Augier, M., & Teece, D. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities and the Multinational Enterprise: Penrosian Insights and Omissions. Management International Review, 47, 175-192. DOI: 10.1007/s11575-007-0010-8

Bednarczyk, M. (1996). Otoczenie i przedsiębiorczość w zarządzaniu strategicznym organizacją gospodarczą. Zeszyty Naukowe. Seria: Monografie nr. 128. Akademia Ekonomiczna w Krako-wie.

Bednarczyk, M. (2001). Organizacje publiczne. Zarządzanie innowacyjnością. Wydawnictwo Nau-kowe PWN.

Bednarczyk, M. (2019). Istota e-przedsiębiorczości w praktyce działań biznesowych i społecznych. In M. Najda-Janoszka. S. Kopera. M. Bednarczyk, E-przedsiebiorczość. Zasady i praktyka (pp. 13-17). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Benazzouz, N.M. (2019). Entrepreneurial orientation and innovation intensity: A synthetic litera-ture review. International Entrepreneurship Review, 5(2), 23-36. DOI: 10.15678/IER.2019.0502.02

Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign envi-ronments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75-87. DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250100107

Czakon, W. (2005). Ku systemowej teorii przewagi konkurencyjnej przedsiębiorstwa. Przegląd organizacji, 5, 5-8.

Czakon, W. (2009). Relational capability of organizations – theoretical advances. Journal of Eco-nomics and Management, 5, 47-65.

Dyer, J., Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2001). How to Make Strategic Alliances Work. MIT Sloan Manage-ment Review, 42(4), 37-43.

Dyer, J., & Kale, P. (2007). Relational Capabilities. Drivers and Implications. In C.E. Helfat, S. Finkelstein, W. Mitchell, M.A. Peteraf, H. Singh, D.J. Teece, & S.G. Winter(Eds.), Dynamic ca-pabilities. Understanding strategic change in organizations (pp. 65-79). Blackwell.

Ebers, M., & Maurer, I. (2014). Connections count: How relational embeddedness and relational empowerment foster absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 43, 318-332. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.017

Franco, M., & Haase, H. (2013). Firm resources and entrepreneurial orientation as determinants for collaborative entrepreneurship. Management Decision, 51(3), 680-696. DOI: 10.1108/00251741311309724

Gartner, W.B. (1989). “Who is an entrepreneur?” is the wrong question. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(4), 47-67. DOI: 10.1177/104225878901300406

Gupta, A.K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Stra-tegic Management Journal, 21(4), 481-510. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200004)21:4<473::AID-SMJ84>3.0.CO;2-I

Hisrich, R.D., Peters, M.P., & Shepherd, D.A. (2005). Entrepreneurship (6th Edition). McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Hughes, M., & Morgan, R.E. (2007). Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Mar-keting Management, 36, 651-661. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.04.003

Johannisson, B. (2003). Entrepreneurship as a collective phenomenon. In E. Genescà, D. Urbano, J. Capelleras, C. Guallarte, & J. Vergès, (Eds.), Creación de Empresas—Entrepreneurship (pp.87-109). Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

Khan., A.M., & Manopichetwattana. V. (1989). Innovative and noninnovative small firms: Types and characteristics. Management Science, 35(5). 597-606.

Klimas, P., & Czakon, W. (2018). Organizational innovativeness and coopetition: a study of video game developers. Review of Managerial Science, 12(2), 469-497. DOI: 10.1007/s11846-017-0269-5

Kusa, R. (2017a). O cykliczności procesu przedsiębiorczości w organizacjach. Próba opracowania koncepcji. Przegląd Organizacji, 5, 31-37.

Kusa, R. (2017b). Interorganisational Collaboration in View of the Theory of Entrepreneurship. Studia i Materiały, 23(1), 83-93. DOI: 10.7172/1733-9758.2017.23.8

Kusa, R. (2020). Theorizing on coopetition as dimension of entrepreneurial orientation. In J. Duda, T. Bernat (Eds.), Business. Economics and Science. Common Challenges (pp. 85-91). Filodiritto Publisher. DOI:10.26352/CY29_MONOGRAPH_BUSNESS_ECONOMICS_KRAKOV2020

Ma, H., & Tan, J. (2006). Key components and implications of entrepreneurship: A 4-P framework. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 704-725. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1552136

Morris, M.H. (1998). Entrepreneurial intensity: Sustainable advantages for individuals. organiza-tions. and societies. Quorum Books.

Lorenzoni, G., & Lipparini, A. (1999). The Leveraging of Interorganizational Relationships as Dis-tinctive Organizational Capability: A Longitudinal Study. Strategic Management Journal, 20(4), 317-338.

Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21, 135-172. DOI: 10.2307/258632

Ma, H., & Tan, J. (2006). Key components and implications of entrepreneurship: A 4-P framework. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 704-725. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.04.009

Möller, K., & Svahn, S. (2003). Managing Strategic Nets – a Capability Perspective. Marketing Theory, 3, 209-234. DOI: 10.1177/14705931030032002

Narayanan, V. (2017). Theorizing on entrepreneurial orientation in international business: A syn-thetic review. International Entrepreneurship Review, 3(1), 9-23. DOI: 10.15678/PM.2017.0301.01

Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1967). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill Inc.

Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Urbano, D. (2009). Overview of collaborative entrepreneurship: An integrat-ed approach between business decisions and negotiations. Group Decision Negotiation, 18, 419-430. DOI: 10.1007/s10726-008-9134-x

Rodriguez-Diaz, M., & Espino-Rodriguez, T.F. (2006). Developing Relational Capabilities in Hotels. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 18(1), 25-40. DOI: 10.1108/09596110610641957

Ruef, M. (2010). The entrepreneurial group: Social identities, relations, and collective action (In The Kauffman Foundation Series on Innovation and Entrepreneurship). Princeton University Press.

Sharma, P., & Chrisman, J.J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 11-28. DOI: 10.1177/104225879902300302

Shook, C.L., Priem, R.L., & McGee, J.E. (2003). Venture creation and the enterprising individual: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 29(3), 379-399. DOI: 10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00016-3

Stevenson, H.H., & Jarillo, J.C. (1990). A Paradigm of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial manage-ment. Strategic Management Journal, 11(4), 17-27.

Welbourne, T.M., & Pardo-del-Val, M. (2009) Relational capital: strategic advantage for small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) through negotiation and collaboration. Group Decision and Negotiation, 18, 483-497. DOI: 10.1007/s10726-008-9138-6

Yao, X., Wen, W., & Ren, Z. (2009). Corporate entrepreneurship in the enterprise clusters environ-ment —Influence of network resources and entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 3(4), 566-582. DOI: 10.1007/s11782-009-0027-x.


Published : 2020-09-30

KusaR. (2020). Linking relational capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation of an organization. International Entrepreneurship Review, 6(3), 49-60.

Rafał Kusa
AGH University of Science and Technology in Krakow  Poland

Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Management at the AGH University of Science and Technology in Krakow (Poland); PhD in Economics from the Faculty of Economics and International Relations at Krakow University of Economics (Poland), Master Degree in Management and Marketing from the Faculty of Management at Krakow University of Economics (Poland). He is a member of the local board of the Scientific Society for Management and Organization (Poland). His research interests include organizational management, organizational entrepreneurship, social entrepreneurship, non-profit organizations, and tourist management.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

1. The author agrees to publish his article free of charge in the journal "International Entrepreneurship Review" (IER) in the language of the above publication (English). The editorial staff reserves the right to shorten texts and to change titles.

2. The journal allows the authors to keep their copyrights (the copyright) in accordance with the license: Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 from 2023 (since vol. 9, no 1). By the end of 2022 we published under Creative Commons CC BY-ND 4.0.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) only the final version of the article, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise to use any of the following research society portals:

- ResearchGate
- Selected Works
- Academic Search