Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2018)
5th AIB-CEE 2018 Conference Proceedings | 9th ENTRE 2018 Conference Proceedings (Special Issue)

Articles

Evaluating the BizMOOC project Learning to Learn MOOC: The OpenupEd Quality Framework in Action

Published 2018-09-12

  • Rebecca Pitt

Rebecca Pitt
The Open University

Abstract

This paper presents the concept of, and contextualises, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). It subsequently evaluates a MOOC developed to address the European Commission LifeLong Learning (LLL) Key Competency of Learning to Learn during the ERASMUS+ funded BizMOOC project. The paper presents a case study example of the OpenupEd Framework evaluating the Learning to Learn MOOC. This paper presents evidence that an evaluation framework that emphasises the “open” element of MOOC and foregrounds iterative processes to improve the devel-opment of MOOC is vital in the creating genuinely “open” resources. A growing number of businesses, higher education institutions and other stakeholders are engaged, or have an interest, in developing MOOC. This paper adds value by providing a case study example of use of a MOOC evaluation framework and analysing the results.

Keywords

MOOC, evaluation, Higher Education, Business, Quality Assurance, OpenupEd Framework, online learning, Massive Open Online Course, Open Education

PDF

References

  1. Bali, M. (2014) MOOC Pedagogy: Gleaning Good Practice from Existing MOOCs MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching Vol 10, No 1. Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5e91/05f38d1d042f0a15cd1378af4427f685b869.pdf
  2. Brown, M. (2018) Why Invest in MOOCs? Strategic Institutional Drivers in D. Jansen; L. Konings (Eds.) The 2018 OpenupEd Trent Report on MOOCs. (pp.6-9). Maastrict, NL: EADTU. Retrieved from: https://www.openuped.eu/images/Publications/The_2018_OpenupEd_trend_report_ on_MOOCs.pdf (accessed: 7 December 2018)
  3. Conole, G. (2016) MOOC as Disruptive Technologies: Strategies for Enhancing the Learner Experience and Quality of MOOCs. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia. 50(2) Retrieved from: https://www.um.es/ead/red/50/conole.pdf
  4. Cormier, D. (2008) The CCK08 MOOC – Connectivism course, ¼ way Dave’s Educational Blog: Building a Better Rhizome Retrieved from: http://davecormier.com/edblog/2008/10/02/the-cck08-mooc-connectivism-course-14-way/
  5. Creelman, A. and Witthaus, G. (2018) Facilitated MOOC support – Closed Bubbles in an Open Sea in D. Jansen; L. Konings (Eds.) The 2018 OpenupEd Trent Report on MOOCs. (pp.6-9). Maastrict, NL: EADTU. Retrieved from: https://www.openuped.eu/images/Publications/The_2018_OpenupEd_trend_report_on_MOOCs.pdf (accessed: 7 December 2018)
  6. European Commission (2018, January 17). Proposal for a COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION on Key Competences for LifeLong Learning European Commission Staff Working Document Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/education/sites/education/files/swd-recommendation-key-competences-lifelong-learning.pdf (accessed: 29 August 2018)
  7. European Commission (2006, December 30) Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning (2006/962/EC) Official Journal of the European Union Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32006H0962&from=EN (accessed: 5 September 2018)
  8. Friedl, C. and Staubitz, T. (2018) Corporate MOOC Trends in D. Jansen; L. Konings (Eds.) The 2018 OpenupEd Trent Report on MOOCs. (pp.6-9). Maastrict, NL: EADTU. Retrieved from: https://www.openuped.eu/images/Publications/The_2018_OpenupEd_trend_report_on_MOOCs.pdf (accessed: 7 December 2018)
  9. Friedl, C. (2015) Detailed Project Description (unpublished)
  10. Galley, R. (2015) Learning Design at The Open University Institute of Educational Technology, The Open University Retrieved from: http://www.open.ac.uk/iet/learning-design/sites/www.open.ac.uk.iet.learning-design/files/files/ecms/web-content/Learning-Design-at-the-Open-University.pdf (accessed: 29 August 2018)
  11. Grover, S. Franz, P, Schneider, E and Pea, R. (2013) The MOOC as Distributed Intelligence: Dimensions of a Framework & Evaluation of MOOCs 10th Annual International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Madison, WI. Retrieved from: https://web.stanford.edu/~shuchig/docs/Framework%20for%20Design%20&%20Evaluation%20of%20MOOCs-Grover-Franz-Schneider-Pea.pdf
  12. Hood, N. & Littlejohn, A. (2016) Quality in MOOCs: Surveying the Terrain Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from: http://oasis.col.org/bitstream/handle/11599/2352/2015_QualityinMOOC s-Surveying-the-Terrain.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed: 3 December 2018)
  13. Jansen, D. (2016). BizMOOC Discussion Paper 4: Existing MOOC Quality Models. BizMOOC Project. Retrieved from: http://bizmooc.eu/papers/quality/ (accessed: 29 August 2018)
  14. Jansen, D. Rosewell, J. & Kear, K. (2016). Quality Frameworks for MOOCs. Open Education: From OERs to MOOCs (Jemni, M. & Khribi, M.K. (eds)) (pp. 261-281) Springer, Berlin. Preprint retrieved from: http://eadtu.eu/documents/Publications/Quality_Frameworks_for_MOOC s_Springer.pdf (accessed: 5 September 2018)
  15. Jordan, K. (2015) Massive Open Online Course Completion Rates Revisited: Assessment, Length and Attrition. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (IRRODL), Vol 16. No 3. Retrieved from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2112/3340
  16. Jordan, K. (2014). Initial Trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (IRRODL), Vol 15. No 1. Retrieved from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1651
  17. Koller, D. & Ng, A. (2013) The online revolution: Education for Everyone Distinguished Speaker Series, Said Business School, University of Oxford Retrieved from: http://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=mQ-K-sOW4fU&feature=youtu.be (Last Accessed: 7 December 2018)
  18. Lowenthal, P. R. & Hodges, C. B. (2015) In Search of Quality: Using Quality Matters to Analyze the Quality of Massive, Open, Online Courses (MOOCs) The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (IRRODL), Vol 16. No 5. Retrieved from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2348/3411
  19. Margaryan, A. Bianco, M. and Littlejohn, A. (2015) Instructional Quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) Computers and Education 80, 77-83 Retrieved from: https://www-sciencedirect-com.libezproxy.open.ac.uk/journal/computers-and-education/vol/80/suppl/C
  20. Pappano, L. (2012) The Year of the MOOC The New York Times Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html (accessed: 7 December 2018)
  21. Pietkiewicz, K. (2017) BizMOOC Discussion Paper 14: Defined definition of the key competencies ‘learning to learn, sense of creativity and entrepreneurship (& intrapreneurship)’, for the use of the project BizMOOC Retrieved from: http://bizmooc.eu/papers/lll-competences/ (accessed: 29 August 2018)
  22. Pitt, R. (2018) R3.4 Feedback Solicitation Strategy BizMOOC Project Retrieved from: http://bizmooc.eu/outcomes/
  23. Pitt, R. de los Arcos, B. Koppel, K. Miani, S and Sancin, C. (2018) BizMOOC Result 4.2a Evaluation Report on Pilot MOOC1 – Learning to Learn BizMOOC Project http://bizmooc.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/BizMOOC-R4.2a-Evaluation-Report-MOOC1-LearningToLearn.pdf
  24. Rosewell, J. and Jansen, D. (2014) The OpenupEd quality label: Benchmarks for MOOCs The International Journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning (pp. 88-100) Retrieved from: http://oro.open.ac.uk/41173/1/Rosewell%20%26%20Jansen%20%282014%29%20The%20OpenupEd%20quality%20label-%20Benchmarks%20for%20MOOCs.pdf (accessed: 29 August 2018)
  25. Shah, D. (2018) A Product at Every Price: A Review of MOOC Stats and Trends in 2017 MOOC Report by Class Central Retrieved from: https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-stats-and-trends-2017/ (accessed: 7 December 2018)
  26. Stracke, C. M., & Tan, E. (2018). The Quality of Open Online Learning and Education: Towards a Quality Reference Framework for MOOCs. In J. Kay, & R. Luckin (Eds.), Rethinking learning in the digital age. Making the Learning Sciences Count: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2018 (pp. 1029-1032). London: International Society of the Learning Sciences. Available from: http://opening-up.education/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Stracke _Tan_2018_Quality_Open_Online_Learning_Education_Towards_QRF_ICLS.pdf
  27. Traxler, J. (2018) Community MOOCs – Back to Basics, Back to the Future in D. Jansen; L. Konings (Eds.) The 2018 OpenupEd Trent Report on MOOCs. (pp.6-9). Maastrict, NL: EADTU. Retrieved from: https://www.openuped.eu/images/Publications/The_2018_OpenupEd_trend_report_ on_MOOCs.pdf (accessed: 7 December 2018)
  28. Watters, A. (2014) From “Open” to Justice #OpenCon2014 Retrieved from: http://hackeducation.com/2014/11/16/from-open-to-justice
  29. Weller, M. (2014) The Battle for Open: How Openness Won and Why it Doesn’t Feel Like Victory. London: Ubiquity Press Retrieved from: https://www.ubiquitypress.com/site/books/10.5334/bam/
  30. Wiley, D. (2015, March 27). Stop Saying “High Quality” [Web log post]. Retrieved from: https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3821 (accessed: 29 August 2018)
  31. Zur, A. Karwinski, M. Friedl, C. & Jansen, D. (2018) Joint Evaluation Report on three Pilot MOOCs BizMOOC Project Retrieved from: http://bizmooc.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/BizMOOC-R4.2-Evaluation-Report-On-3-Pilot-MOOCs.pdf

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.