Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

MOOCs and entrepreneurship education-contributions, opportunities and gaps

Abstract

The goal of this study is to provide a systemic review and evaluation of the  existing MOOCs and Micro-credentials in the area of entrepreneurship, adding to the current state of research on online entrepreneurship education. The study is based on desk research consisting of literature review as well as comparative analysis and systemic review of entrepreneurship MOOC and Micro-credentials. Two MOOC aggregators Class Central and MOOC List as well as  five MOOC platforms, Coursera, edX, FutureLearn, Udacity and Kadenze, have been used to identify the existing courses. The main comparison criteria in both analyses have been: course focus, format, length, fees and language. Key research findings indicate that the majority of the current MOOCs and Micro-credentials devoted to entrepreneurship focus on start-ups and universal entrepreneurial skills. The area of firm-level entrepreneurship remains most unaddressed by MOOCs. Two MOOC platforms Coursera and edX lead at this early development stage of Micro-credentials. The Micro-credential offer is growing rapidly, responding to the learner preferences of modularity, stackability and competence based education. This study aims to contribute to the analysis of new developments within online entrepreneurship education. The findings present valuable practical implications, especially relevant for MOOC providers and creators for evaluating their current entrepreneurship education offer, in order to identify possible gaps and opportunities for future online courses, credentials and degrees.

Keywords

entrepreneurship education, online entrepreneurship education, MOOC, micro-credential

PDF

References

  1. Dickson, P. H., Solomon, G. T., & Weaver, K. M. (2008). Entrepreneurial selection and success: does education matter?. Journal of small business and enterprise development, 15(2), 239-258.
  2. Drucker, P.F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Harper & Row
  3. Elert, N., Andersson, F. W., & Wennberg, K. (2015). The impact of entrepreneurship education in high school on long-term entrepreneurial performance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Or-ganization, 111, 209-223.
  4. European Commission. (2010). Entrepreneurship in the EU and Beyond. Analytical Report. Flash Eurobarometer No. 283
  5. European Commission. (2013). Entrepreneurship 2020 action plan: reigniting the entrepreneurial spirit in Europe.
  6. European Parliament and Council (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competencies for lifelong learning. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union, 30(12), 2006.
  7. FFE-YE. (2012). Impact of Entrepreneurship Education in Denmark - 2011. In L. Vestergaard, K. Moberg & C. Jørgensen (Eds.). Odense: The Danish Foundation for Entrepreneurship - Young Enterprise.
  8. Gorman, G., Hanlon, D., & King, W. (1997). Some research perspectives on entrepreneurship edu-cation, enterprise education and education for small business management: a ten-year litera-ture review. International small business journal, 15(3), 56-77.
  9. Jenner, C. (2012). Business and education: powerful social innovation partners. Social Innovation Review.
  10. Katz, J. A. (2003). The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship educa-tion: 1876–1999. Journal of business venturing, 18(2), 283-300.
  11. Katz, J. A. (2014). Education and training in entrepreneurship. In The psychology of entrepreneur-ship (pp. 241-268). Psychology Press.
  12. Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 29(5), 577-597.
  13. Matkin, W. G. (2017). Why Digital Credentials Will Render University Transcripts Obsolete and Reshape Higher Education. Retrieved August 28, 2018, from https://unbound.upcea.edu/innovation/alternative-credentialing/why-digital-credentials-will-render-university-transcripts-obsolete-and-reshape-higher-education/
  14. Martin, B. C., McNally, J. J., & Kay, M. J. (2013). Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Journal of Busi-ness Venturing, 28(2), 211-224.
  15. Samwel Mwasalwiba, E. (2010). Entrepreneurship education: a review of its objectives, teaching methods, and impact indicators. Education+ Training, 52(1), 20-47.
  16. Pickard, L. (2018, July 18). Analysis of 450 MOOC-Based Micro-credentials Reveals Many Options But Little Consistency. Retrieved August 28, 2018, from https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-micro-credentials-analysis-2018/
  17. Pittaway, L., & Cope, J. (2007). Entrepreneurship education: A systematic review of the evi-dence. International small business journal, 25(5), 479-510.
  18. Radford, A. W., Coningham, B. & Horn, L. (2015). MOOCs: Not just for college students – how organizations can use MOOCs for professional development, Employment Relations Today, 41(4), pp. 1–15.
  19. Rae, D. (2010). Universities and enterprise education: responding to the challenges of the new era. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17(4), 591-606.
  20. Raposo, M., & Do Paço, A. (2011). Entrepreneurship education: Relationship between education and entrepreneurial activity. Psicothema, 23(3), 453-457.
  21. Rigg, C., & O'Dwyer, B. (2012). Becoming an entrepreneur: researching the role of mentors in identity construction. Education+ Training, 54.
  22. Siemens, G., & Tittenberger, P. (2009). Handbook of emerging technologies for learning. Winni-peg: University of Manitoba.
  23. Shah, D. (2017, September 13). At MIT and Georgia Tech, MOOCs Are Showing Up On Campus. Retrieved August 31, 2018, from https://www.class-central.com/report/mit-georgia-tech-moocs-show-up-on-campus/
  24. Shah, D. (2018a, January 22). A Product at Every Price: A Review of MOOC Stats and Trends in 2017. Retrieved August 28, 2018, from https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-stats-and-trends-2017/
  25. Shah, D. (2018b, April 9). MOOCWatch #17: MOOCs Become Big Business. Retrieved August 28, 2018, from https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-become-big-business/
  26. Solomon, G.T., Duffy, S., & Tarabishy, A. (2002). The state of entrepreneurship education in the United States: A nationwide survey and analysis. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 1(1), pp. 65–86.
  27. Sreeleakha P., & Manikandan, N. (2015). The way forward with MOOCs – Professional develop-ment perspectives, American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 15(514), pp. 29–32.
  28. Stevenson, L., & Lundström, A. (2001). Patterns and trends in entrepreneurship/SME policy and practice in ten economies (Vol. 3). Vällingby, Sweden: Elanders Gotab.
  29. Treeck, T. v., Himpsl-Gutermann, K. & Robes, J. (2013). Offene und partizipative Lernkonzepte. E-Portfolios, MOOCs und Flipped Classrooms. In: Ebner, M. & Schön, S. (eds). L3T – Lehrbuch für Lernen und Lehren mit Technologien. Version 2013.
  30. Von Graevenitz, G., Harhoff, D., & Weber, R. (2010). The effects of entrepreneurship educa-tion. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(1), 90-112.
  31. Welsh, D. & Dragusin, M. (2013). The New Generation of Massive Open Online Course (MOOCS) and Entrepreneurship Education. Small Business Institute Journal, 2013, Vol. 9, No. 1, 51-65.
  32. Yang, A. (2016, February 25). Why Entrepreneurship Education Does Not Work. Retrieved August 29, 2018, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewyang/2016/02/25/entrepreneurship-education-does-not-work/

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.