Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019)
June 2019

Articles

Entrepreneurial orientation of startups: Research results

https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2019.0502.03

Published 2019-12-05

  • Jarosław Korpysa

Jarosław Korpysa
University of Szczecin

Abstract

Objective: The main purpose of the paper is to establish which elements of entrepreneurial orientation (EO) have the biggest influence on the activities of Polish start-ups.

Research Design & Methods: The diagnosis was based on an analysis of individual components of entrepreneurial orientation and presentation of the results of research carried out by the author among 382 start-ups in Poland.

Findings: The research provide that, innovative activity of companies and exploring new market opportunities and possibilities by start-ups were important factors conditioning the operations and development of the companies studied. It is advisable to deepen the current theory of entrepreneurship orientation in relation to start-ups, understood as young innovative companies.

Contribution & Value Added: The theoretical-empirical deliberations presented in the article may be a valuable source of information within the scope of the influence the particular elements of entrepreneurial orientation have on start-ups. However, for entrepreneurs they may be an impulse in the field of effective use of the elements of EO in the process of building competitiveness of young companies in Poland which is reflected in particular pillars of EO.

 

Keywords

entrepreneurial orientation, start-up, innovation, entrepreneurship, innonations

PDF

Author Biography

Jarosław Korpysa

Hab. PhD prof. US, is employed at the Department of Microeconomics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Szczecin University (Poland).Korpysa has published articles and delivered a lot of conference presentations about entrepreneurship, spin of companies, inequalities in the labour market and strategic analysis of companies. He was a follower of 7th and 6th FP, Human Resources and Mobility Activity, Marii Curie Action at University of Vilnius (Lithuania), University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) and IWEIR, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.

References

  1. Al Mamun, A., Kumar, N., Ibrahim, M.D., & Bin, M.N.H. (2017). Validating the Measurement of Entrepreneurial Orientation. Economics & Sociology, 10(4), 51-66.
  2. Amin, M. (2015). The effect of entrepreneurship orientation and learning orientation on SMEs’ performance: an SEM-PLS approach. Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 8(3), 215-230.
  3. Andersén, J. (2017). What about the employees in entrepreneurial firms? A multi-level analysis of the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation, role ambiguity, and social support. International Small Business Journal, 35(8), 969-990.
  4. Anderson, B.S., Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. (2009). Understanding the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and strategic learning capability: an empirical investigation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(3), 218-240.
  5. Apanowicz, J. (2005). Metodologiczne uwarunkowania pracy naukowej: prace doktorskie, prace habilitacyjne. Warszawa: Difin.
  6. Blank, S., & Dorf, B. (2013). Podręcznik startupu. Budowa wielkiej firmy krok po kroku. Gliwice: Helion.
  7. Bogatyreva, K., Beliaeva, T., Shirokova, G., & Puffer, S.M. (2017). As different as chalk and cheese? The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and SMEs’ growth: evidence from Russia and Finland. Journal of East-West Business, 23(4), 337-366.
  8. Cavusgil, S.T., & Knight, G. (2015). The born global firm: An entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1), 3-16.
  9. Charir, N.A., Primyastanto, M., & Abidin, Z. (2017). Effect of Marketing Knowledge Competency and Entrepreneurship Orientation on Marketing Capabilities and Marketing Performance of Fishery Smes in Malang City, East Java. ECSOFiM (Economic and Social of Fisheries and Marine), 5 (1), 53-67.
  10. Covin, J.G., Lumpkin, G.T. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: Reflections on a needed construct. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 35(5), 855-872.
  11. Dada, O. (2018). A model of entrepreneurial autonomy in franchised outlets: a systematic review of the empirical evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 206-226.
  12. Dai, L., Maksimov, V., Gilbert, B. A., & Fernhaber, S.A. (2014). Entrepreneurial orientation and international scope: The differential roles of innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4), 511-524.
  13. Dyduch, W. (2008). Pomiar przedsiębiorczości organizacyjnej. Prace Naukowe/Akademia Ekonomiczna w Katowicach, Katowice: UE Katowice.
  14. European Commission. (1996). The proposal of the European Commission from April 3rd, 1996 concerning the definition of the small and medium enterprises (96/280/EC),
  15. Eshima, Y., & Anderson, B.S. (2017). Firm growth, adaptive capability, and entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 38(3), 770-779.
  16. Fellnhofer, K. (2017). Drivers of innovation success in sustainable businesses. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 1534-1545.
  17. Gloss, A., Pollack, J.M., & Ward, M.K. (2017). A risky shift? An exploration of the measurement equivalence of entrepreneurial attitudes and entrepreneurial orientation across socioeconomic gradients. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 7, 32-37.
  18. Hayter, C.S. (2016). A trajectory of early-stage spinoff success: the role of knowledge intermediaries within an entrepreneurial university ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 633-656.
  19. Hess, A.M., & Rothaermel, F.T. (2011). When are assets complementary? Star scientists, strategic alliances, and innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 32 (8), 895-909.
  20. Hung Kee, D.M., & Rahman, N.A. (2017). Analyzing entrepreneurial orientation impact on start- up success with support service as moderator: A PLS-SEM approach. Business and Economic Horizons, 13(2), 128-141.
  21. Khedhaouria, A., Gurău, C., & Torrès, O. (2015). Creativity, self-efficacy, and small-firm performance: the mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Small Business Economics, 44(3), 485-504.
  22. Kuratko, D.F., Montagno, R.V., & Hornsby, J.S. (1990). Developing an intrapreneurial assessment instrument for an effective corporate entrepreneurial environment. Strategic management journal, 11, 49-58.
  23. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996a). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
  24. Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G.G. (1996b). Enriching the entrepreneurial orientation construct-a reply to “entrepreneurial orientation or pioneer advantage”, The Academy of Management Review, 21 (3), 605-607.
  25. Martens, C.D.P., Machado, F.J., Martens, M.L., & de Freitas, H.M.R. (2018). Linking entrepreneurial orientation to project success. International Journal of Project Management, 36(2), 255-266.
  26. Mthanti, T., & Ojah, K. (2017). Entrepreneurial orientation (EO): Measurement and policy implications of entrepreneurship at the macroeconomic level. Research Policy, 46(4), 724-739.
  27. Nadhar, M., Tawe, A., & Parawansa, D.A. (2017). The Effect of Work Motivation and Entrepreneurship Orientation on Business Performance through Entrepreneurial Commitments of Coffee Shops in Makassar. International Review of Management and Marketing, 7(1), 470-474.
  28. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1967). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
  29. Reiss, E.(2011). The Lean Startup, Crown Business.
  30. Skala, A. (2016). Statement on the first research on digital startups in Poland. International Entrepreneurship| Przedsiębiorczość Międzynarodowa, 2(2), 191-202.
  31. Stuetzer, M., Audretsch, D.B., Obschonka, M., Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., & Potter, J. (2018). Entrepreneurship culture, knowledge spillovers and the growth of regions. Regional Studies, 52(5), 608-618.
  32. Tietz, R. (2013). Executive Teams in Research-based Spin-off Companies: An Empirical Analysis of Executive Team Characteristics, Strategy, and Performance. St. Gallen, Switzerland: Springer.
  33. Wisseman, J. G. (2005). Technostarterzy: dlaczego i jak?. Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości, Warszawa: PARP.
  34. Wójcicki, T. (2012). Application of the CAWI method for the holistic support of innovation transfer to business practice. Problemy Eksploatacji, 4, 175-186.
  35. Yusoff, M.N.H.B., Al Mamun, A., Ibrahim, M.D., & Hassan, H. (2018). Measuring and comparing functional business skills and knowledge among Asnaf community in Malaysia. Economics & Sociology, 11(2), 229-247.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.