Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022)
September 2022

Articles

Implementation of new technologies in accounting and financial processes: An effectiveness assessment

https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2022.0803.01

Published 2022-09-30

  • Rafał Szmajser
    • ,
  • Marcin Kędzior
    • ,
  • Mariusz Andrzejewski
    • ,
  • Katarzyna Świetla

Rafał Szmajser
Krakow University of Economics

Marcin Kędzior
Krakow University of Economics

Mariusz Andrzejewski
Krakow University of Economics

Katarzyna Świetla
Krakow University of Economics

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this paper is to explore accountants’ views on the usage of Robotic Process Automation technology (RPA) which brings efficiency increase.

Research Design & Methods: An online survey has been addressed to over 500 respondents from international companies, where 160+ complete answers were received from the most important types of organizations in the business services industry. The non-parametric rho Spearman correlation coefficient and the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test and business case for the RPA implementation efficiency were used.

Findings: Based on the research results obtained, it should be emphasized that robotization technologies which raise the efficiency of financial and accounting services make an important impact on the efficiency of modern business services sector. Application of RPA assumes replacing work of an existing employee with the use of dedicated software (software robots) to support activities, primarily repeated and uncomplicated, characterized by a low number of exceptions.

Implications & Recommendations: RPA application is commonly used in modern business services, particularly in the areas of Finance, Accounting, IT and Human Resources Management. By utilizing RPA technology, the effectiveness of operations increases while reducing workload, minimizing possible errors in the process. The greatest efficiency resulting from the RPA implementation was observed in the Accounts Payable department, to a lesser extent in the General Ledger department and in the Tax section. The assessment of managers in terms of the effects of RPA implementation is unequal, while for Business, IT Process Outsourcing companies (BPO / ITO), Shared Service Centers (SSC), Consulting / Advisory companies and their customers no significant differences were found.

Contribution & Value Added: The article presents an assessment of the effectiveness of the use of Robotic Process Automation in Process Outsourcing companies (BPO / ITO) and Shared Service Centers (SSC) operating in Poland. It is one of the first studies of this type for enterprises operating in Poland. The article uses a relatively large number of responses (160+) from the respondents. In the previous studies in the literature, the answers obtained came from a much smaller number of respondents and were conducted in the form of direct interviews. In the article, the group of respondents consists not only of managers of outsourcing companies, but also auditing companies and clients of outsourcing companies. The article also presents a financial simulation of the effectiveness of BPO / ITO and SSC using Robotic Process Automation, which additionally validates the responses obtained in the questionnaire.

Keywords

robotic process automation, business process outsourcing BPO, IT outsourcing, company efficiency, Poland, questionnaire

(PDF) Save

Author Biography

Rafał Szmajser

Seasoned finance executive with 20 plus years of diverse experience acquired across a range of industries including: Insurance (Shared Service Center Zurich Insurance Company – Head of Delivery Center); petrochemical industry with BP and Slovnaft-MOL (CFO and Board Member), Business Process Outsourcing through the Capgemini (Senior Director). His recent experience includes role of Head of Finance Operations in HEINEKEN Global Shared Service where he was responsible for team of approx. 800 finance specialists. He holds PhD in Finance (University of Economics in Krakow) and MBA from Oxford Brooks University. Rafal has got proven records of continuous improvement (Lean Six Sigma Black Belt), Business Controls, Risk & Compliance (Internal Auditor – ISO 9001 certification), RPA and project management (PMP).

Marcin Kędzior

Associate Professor, Department of Financial Accounting, Institute of Finance, Cracow University of Economics (Poland). Habilitated doctor in economics (2016). PhD in economics (2009). Master of Science in economics (2002). Member of the board of an Polish Accounting Association, branch in Cracow, chairman of the Corporate Finance and Accounting Commission (CUE). His research interests include: capital structure, managerial accounting, IFRS, Corporate Social Responsibility, corporate finance.

Mariusz Andrzejewski

Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Financial Accounting, Institute of Finance, Cracow University of Economics (Poland). Habilitated doctor in economics (2013). PhD in economics (2001). Master of Science in Automatics and Robotics (1995). Master in Accounting (1996). Master of Science in Informatics (1997). His research interests include financial audit, corporate finance, financial and managerial accounting, computer-aided techniques in accounting.

Katarzyna Świetla

Associate Professor, Department of Financial Accounting, Institute of Finance, Cracow University of Economics (Poland). Habilitated doctor in economics (2015). PhD in economics (2001). Master of Science in economics (1996). Director of postgraduate studies “Financial Accounting CUE-ACCA”. Her research interests concern outsourcing of modern accounting as well as capital groups and consolidated financial statements.

References

  1. ABSL. (2019). Business Services sector in Poland 2019. https://absl.pl/storage/app/uploads/public/5d0/7a1/406/5d07a140668f0191663458.pdf
  2. Andrzejewski, M., & Dunal, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the curricula of postgraduate studies in financial management: Survey results. International Entrepreneurship Review, 7(4), 89-93. https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2021.0704.07
  3. Asatiani, A., Penttinen, E., Ruissalo, J., & Salovaara, A. (2020). Knowledge workers’ reactions to a planned introduction of robotic process automation—Empirical evidence from an accounting firm. In: R. Hirschheim, A. Heinzl & J. Dibbern (Eds.), Information Systems Outsourcing (pp. 413-452). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45819-5_17
  4. Borrego, A.C., Pardal, P., & Carreira, F.J.A. (2020).The accountant in the digital era and the Covid-19. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/34171
  5. Brooks, C., Gherhes, C., & Vorley, T. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the legal sector: pressures and challenges of transformation. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 13(1), 135-152.
  6. Cooper, L.A., Holderness Jr, D.K., Sorensen, T.L., & Wood, D.A. (2019). Robotic process automation in public accounting. Accounting Horizons, 33(4), 15-35.
  7. Cooper, L., Holderness, D.K., Sorensen, T.L., & Wood, D.A. (2021). Perceptions of Robotic Process Automation in Big 4 Public Accounting Firms: Do Firm Leaders and Lower-Level Employees Agree?. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting. https://doi.org/10.2308/JETA-2020-085
  8. Eikebrokk, T.R., & Olsen, D.H. (2020). Robotic Process Automation and Consequences for Knowledge Workers; a Mixed-Method Study. In: M. Hattingh, M. Matthee, H. Smuts, I. Pappas, Y.K. Dwivedi, M. Mäntymäki (Eds.), Responsible Design, Implementation and Use of Information and Communication Technology (pp. 114-125). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44999-5_10.
  9. Engberg, S., & Sordal, T. (2019). Robotic Process Automation and its Effects on Job Characteristics. Master thesis 15 HEC, course INFM10 in Information Systems. Lund.
  10. Fernandez, D., & Aman, A. (2018). Impacts of Robotic Process Automation on Global Accounting Services. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 9, 123-131. https://doi.org/10.17576/AJAG-2018-09-11
  11. Gotthardt, M., Koivulaakso, D., Paksoy, O., Saramo, C., Martikainen, M., & Lehner, O. (2020). Current state and challenges in the implementation of smart robotic process automation in accounting and auditing. ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, 9(1), 90-102. https://doi.org/10.35944/jofrp.2020.9.1
  12. Gulin, D., Hladika, M., & Valenta, I. (2019). Digitalization and the Challenges for the Accounting Profession. Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA-ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (Online), vol. 5, no. 1, 428-437. https://doi.org/10.12948/issn14531305/23.4.2019.06
  13. Kaka, E.J. (2020). The COVID-19 crisis, risk compliance and its aftermath on professional accountants. Indonesian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 4(1), 65-81.
  14. Kaya, C.T., Türkyılmaz, M., & Birol, B. (2019). Impact of RPA technologies on accounting systems. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 1(82), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.536083
  15. Kokina, J., & Blanchette, S. (2019). Early evidence of digital labor in accounting: Innovation with Robotic Process Automation. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 35, 100431.
  16. Lee, J., Suh, T., Roy, D., & Baucus, M. (2019). Emerging technology and business model innovation: The case of artificial intelligence. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, 5(3), 44.
  17. Madakam, S., Holmukhe, R., & Jaiswal, D.K. (2019). The future digital work force: robotic process automation (RPA). Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 16, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-1775201916001
  18. Osman, C.C.(2019). Robotic Process Automation: Lessons Learned from Case Studies. Informatica Economica, 23(4), 66-75.
  19. Osmundsen, K., Iden, J., & Bygstad, B. (2019). Organizing robotic process automation: balancing loose and tight coupling. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences. HICSS, Hawaii, 6918-6926. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.829
  20. Özdoğan, B. (2017). The future of accounting profession in an era of start-ups. Accounting and corporate reporting-today and tomorrow, 10.
  21. Ribeiro, J., Lima, R., Eckhardt, T., & Paiva, S. (2021). Robotic Process Automation and Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0–A Literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 1(181), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.104
  22. Rîndașu, S-M.(2017). Emerging information technologies in accounting and related security risks–what is the impact on the Romanian accounting profession. Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, 16(4), 581-609.
  23. Seasongood, S. (2016). A case for robotics in accounting and finance. Financial Executive, 32, 31-39.
  24. Shaffer, K.J., Gaumer, C.J., & Bradley, K.P. (2020). Artificial intelligence products reshape accounting: time to re-train. Development and learning in organizations: an international journal, 34(6).
  25. Sieja, M., & Wach, K. (2019). The Use of Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimization in the Modern Entrepreneurial Economy: Interdisciplinary Perspective. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(4), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070407
  26. Soni, N., Sharma, E.K., Singh, N., & Kapoor, A. (2019). Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Businesses: from Research. Innovation, Market Deployment to Future Shifts in Business Models, 1905-2209.
  27. Stancheva-Todorova, E.P. (2018). How artificial intelligence is challenging accounting profession. Journal of International Scientific Publications Economy & Business, 12, 126-141.
  28. Syed, R., Suriadi, S., Adams, M., Bandara, W,. Leemans, S.J., Ouyang, C.,& Reijers, H.A. (2020). Robotic process automation: contemporary themes and challenges. Computers in Industry, 115, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.103162.
  29. Szmajser, R., Kędzior, M., & Andrzejewski, M. (2019). Wpływ wysokich technologii i umiędzynarodowienia prowadzonej działalności. In: W. Skoczylas & K. Kochański (Eds.), Rachunkowość jako źródło informacji na potrzeby zarządzania wartością dla interesariuszy (pp. 37-41). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.
  30. Van Looy, A. (2020). Adding Intelligent Robots to Business Processes: A Dilemma Analysis of Employees’ Attitudes. In: D. Fahland, Ch. Ghidini, J. Becker & M. Dumas (Eds.), Business Process Management (pp. 435-452). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58666-9_25
  31. Zel, S., & Kongar, E. (2020). Transforming digital employee experience with artificial intelligence. In 2020 IEEE/ITU International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Good (AI4G) (pp. 176-179). IEEE.
  32. Zenuni, B., Begolli, T., & Ujkani, M. (2014). Impact of information technology in the accounting profession. Proceedings of the 5-th International Conference “Information System and Technology Innovations: “Projecting trends to New Economy”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.