Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

City brand in the perception of inhabitants of European capitals: Linear ordering using the TOPSIS method

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2024.1001.02

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the article is to develop a methodology of city ranking based on the criterion of a city’s brand image among its inhabitants.

Research Design & Methods: The article discusses the utilization of the multi-criteria decision-making method (MCDM) to create a ranking of European capitals. It explores the significance of the decision-making approach in establishing a linear order among 28 capital cities within the European Union. The study employs the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for evaluation purposes. By leveraging publicly accessible indicators that gauge the perception of various aspects of a city’s brand by its residents, this method facilitates the generation of a comprehensive ranking.

Findings: The top five positions in the ranking are occupied by the following cities: Brussels, Sofia, Berlin, London and Stockholm. Ljubljana, Prague and Helsinki were ranked lowest.

Implications & Recommendations: The ranking built for the purpose of this article, has managerial implications. It can serve as a valuable re-source for territorial managers, communication experts, urban planners, and decision-makers involved in the cities’ enhancement and promotion. By utilizing this ranking, they can gain insights into the level of attractive-ness and competitiveness of different cities. Furthermore, it enables them to establish measurable strategic objectives for the development of their respective cities. This information empowers these stakeholders to make informed decisions, implement improvements, and enhance the overall value of their cities.

Contribution & Value Added: The article employed ideal solution-based multi-criteria decision-making techniques to evaluate the brand image of cities as perceived by their inhabitants. We selected seven criteria to build the ranking showing the diversity in terms of residents’ satisfaction with living in the city in the following areas: environment and recreation, refinement and diversity, municipal facilities, public services, employment opportunities, cost-effectiveness, and security.

Keywords

city brand, city ranking, European capitals, linear ordering, TOPSIS method

pdf

Author Biography

Ewa Glińska

Associate Professor at Bialystok University of Technology (Poland). Habilitation in Management (2017). Her research interests include city marketing and branding, regional and local policy, destination and city Management, and innovative marketing research.

Sławomira Hajduk

Assistant professor at Bialystok University of Technology (Poland). Ph.D. in Economics (2002). Her research interests include smart city models, the performance of urban smartness, public governance, new spatial planning, and urban management.


References

  1. Aitken, R., & Campelo, A. (2011). The four R’s of place branding. Journal of Marketing Management, 27, 913-933. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2011.560718
  2. Anholt, S. (2006). The Anholt-GMI city brands index: How the world sees the world’s cities. Place Branding, 2(1), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.pb.5990042
  3. Augustyn, A., Hereźniak, M., & Florek M. (2017). W poszukiwaniu wiarygodnych metod pomiaru skuteczności budowania marek miast. Polityki Europejskie, Finanse i Marketing, 17(66), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.22630/PEFIM.2017.17.66.2
  4. Ban, A.J., Ban, O.J., Bogdan, V., Sabau Popa, D.C., & Tuse, D. (2020). Performance evaluation model of Romanian manufacturing listed companies by fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26, 808-836. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.12367
  5. Boisen, M., Terlouw, K., Groote, P., & Couwenberg, O. (2018). Reframing place promotion, place marketing, and place branding - moving beyond conceptual confusion. Cities, 80, 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.021
  6. Braun, E., Kavaratzis, M., & Zenker, S. (2013). My City - My Brand: The Role of Residents in Place Branding. Journal of Place Management and Development, 6(1), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538331311306087
  7. Brencis, A., & Ikkala, J. (2013). Does City Size Matter? City Brand Index VS Population Size. Sociology and Anthropology, 1(2), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.13189/sa.2013.010208
  8. Czupich, M., Łapinska, J., & Bartoš, V. (2022). Environmental Sustainability Assessment of the European Union’s Capital Cities. International Journal of Environmenta Research and Public Health, 19, 4327. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph19074327
  9. Den Berg, L., & Braun, E. (1999). Urban competitiveness, Marketing and the need for Organizing capacity. Urban Studies, 36(5/6), 987-999.
  10. Eshuis, J., Klijn, E.H., & Braun, E. (2014). Place marketing and citizen participation: branding as strategy to address the emotional dimension of policy making?. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(1), 151-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313513872
  11. Florek, M. (2014). Kapitał marki miasta zorientowany na konsumenta. Źródła i pomiar, Poznań: Oficyna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu.
  12. Florek, M., & Janiszewska, K. (2011). Możliwości i ograniczenia pozycjonowania marek terytorialnych. Zeszyty Naukowe / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu, 184, 203-221.
  13. Gilboa S., & Jaffe, E. (2021). Can one brand fit all? Segmenting city residents for place branding. Cities, 116, 103287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103287
  14. Gilboa, S., Jaffe, E.D., Vianelli, D., Pastore, A., & Herstein, R. (2015). A summated rating scale for measuring city image. Cities, 44, 50-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.01.002
  15. Glińska, E. (2016). Budowanie marki miasta – koncepcje, warunki, modele. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer Business.
  16. Glińska, E., Florek, M., & Kowalewska, A. (2009). Wizerunek miasta – od koncepcji do wdrożenia. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer Business.
  17. Gokhan, O., & Ceren, E. (2020). Evaluation of smart and sustainable cities through a hybrid MDCM approach based on ANP and TOPSIS technique. Heliyon, 6(10), e05052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05052
  18. Hajduk, S. (2022). Multi-Criteria Analysis in the Decision-Making Approach for the Linear Ordering of Urban Transport Based on TOPSIS Technique. Energies, 15(1), 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15010274
  19. Hankinson, G. (2004). Relational network brands: towards a conceptual model of place brands. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 10(2), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667040100020
  20. Herget, J., Petrů, Z., & Abrhám, J. (2015). City branding and its economic impacts on tourism. Economics and Sociology, 8(1), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071- 789X.2015/8-1/9)
  21. Kavaratzis, M. (2004). From city marketing to city branding: Toward a theoretical framework for developing city brands. Place Branding, 1(1), 58-73. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.pb.5990005
  22. Kavaratzis, M., & Ashworth, G.J. (2008). Place marketing: How did we get here and where are we going?. Journal of Place Management and Development, 1, 150-165. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538330810889989
  23. Kerr, G., & Balakrishnan, M.S. (2012). Challenges in managing place brands: The case of Sydney. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 8, 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2011.32
  24. Lapinskaitė, I., Stasytytė, V., & Skvarciany, V. (2022). Assessing the European Union capitals in the context of smart sustainable cities. Open House International, 47(4), 763-785. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-01-2022-0021
  25. Lucarelli, A., & Berg, P.O. (2011). City branding: a state-of-the-art review of the research domain. Journal of Place Management and Development, 4(1), 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538331111117133
  26. Melo, A.D. (2020). City Rankings and the Citizens: Exposing Representational and Participatory Gaps. Society with Future: Smart and Liveable Cities, 318, 154-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45293-3_12
  27. Merrilees, B., Miller, D., & Herington, C. (2012). Multiple stakeholders and multiple city brand meanings. European Journal of Marketing, 46(7/8), 1032-1047, https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561211230188
  28. Sojda, A. (2020). Linear ordering of cities in the smart city concept. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, 149, 621-630. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2020.149.51
  29. Sojda, A. (2020). Smart city index based on TOPSIS method. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, 148, 709-718. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2020.148.52
  30. Stanković, J., Džunić, M., Džunić, Ž., & Marinković, S. (2017). A multi-criteria evaluation of the European cities’ sm art performance: Economic, social and environmental aspects. Journal of Economics and Business, 35(2), 519-550. https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2017.2.519
  31. Stuart, M., & Insch, A. (2015). Understanding Resident City Brand (Dis)Engagement. In M. Florek, A. Augustyn, C. Parker, & S. Millington (Eds.). Quin 3rd Place Management & Branding Conference Sustainability, Liveability & Connectivity: Conference proceedings (pp. 232-255). Poznan.
  32. Stubbs, J., & Warnaby, G. (2015). Rethinking Place Branding from a Practice Perspective: Working with Stakeholders. In M. Kavaratzis, G. Warnaby, & G.J. Ashworth (Eds). Rethinking Place Branding. Comprehensive Brand Development for Cities and Regions (pp. 101-118). London: Springer.
  33. The Global Liveability Index 2022 (2022). Retrieved from https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/global-liveability-index-2022/ on March 19, 2023.
  34. Vienna Tops Mercer’s 21st Quality Of Living Ranking (2019). Retrieved form https://www.mercer.com/newsroom/2019-quality-of-living-survey.html on March 19, 2023.
  35. Zenker, S., & Braun, E. (2010). The place brand centre – a conceptual approach for the brand management of places, paper delivered at 39th European Marketing Academy Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark. Retrieved from http://www.placebrand.eu/mediapool/85/857874/data/Zenker_Braun_EMAC2010.pdf on March 19, 2023.
  36. Zenker, S., & Braun, E. (2017). Questioning a “one size fits all” city brand Developing a branded house strategy for place brand management. Journal of Place Management and Development, 10(3), 270-287. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-04-2016-00
  37. Zenker, S. (2011). How to catch a city? The concept and measurement of place brand. Journal of Place Management and Development, 4(1), 40-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538331111117151
  38. Zenker, S. (2009). Who's your target? The creative class as a target group for place branding. Journal of Place Management and Development, 2(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538330910942771
  39. Zenker, S., Petersen, S., & Aholt, A. (2013). The Citizen Satisfaction Index (CSI): Evidence for a four basic factor model in a German sample. Cities, 31, 156-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.02.006
  40. Zhang, L., & Zhao, S.X. (2009). City branding and the Olympic effect: A case study of Beijing. Cities, 26(5), 245-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.05.002
  41. Zheng, Ch. (2020). Comparisons of the City Brand Influence of Global Cities: Word-Embedding Based Semantic Mining and Clustering Analysis on the Big Data of GDELT Global News Knowledge Graph. Sustainability, 12, 6294. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166294

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

81-90 of 104

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.