Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024)
March 2024

Articles

Does environmental policy stringency matter for eco-innovation? Evidence from the EU countries

Published 2024-03-28

  • Justyna Godawska

Justyna Godawska
AGH University of Krakow

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the article is to examine the influence of environmental policy stringency on the eco-innovation level, measured by a number of patents, in European Union countries.

Research Design & Methods: The research method was quantitative. The study used ordinary least squares (OLS) panel regression analysis based on data covering 18 EU countries (Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, and Sweden) and a period from 2013 to 2020 (144 observations). In estimated models, gross domestic product per capita, material import dependency, and human resources in science and technology served as control variables. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, the European Innovation Scoreboard, Eurostat, and the World Bank were the data sources.

Findings: Higher stringency of technology support and market-based instruments positively influences eco-innovation-related patents in EU countries whereas more strict non-market-based instruments do not impact the eco-innovation level. Technology support instruments are more effective in stimulating eco-innovation than market-based instruments. Individual technology support instruments differ in their impact on eco-innovation with R&D subsidies being the most important. The stringency of feed-in tariffs and auctions is a significant factor triggering eco-innovation in the case of wind energy technologies, but not in the case of solar ones.

Implications & Recommendations: This study suggests that stringent technology support and market-based instruments are effective in stimulating eco-innovation in EU countries considered in the research sample. The environmental policy aimed at fostering eco-innovation should concentrate on increasing R&D subsidies for clean technologies. Further tightening emission standards aiming to enhance eco-innovation level is not recommended.

Contribution & Value Added: This study contributes to the literature on the importance of environmental policy stringency in fostering eco-innovation and provides new empirical evidence by examining not only instruments that may have an indirect impact on eco-innovation (i.e. market and non-market ones) but also technology support instruments, which have received less attention in previous studies. The analysis used data on the recently updated and improved OECD environmental policy stringency index.

Keywords

environmental policy stringency, eco-innovation, technology support instruments, R&D subsidies, environmental taxes, environmental standards

pdf

Author Biography

Justyna Godawska

Habilitation in economics and finance, PhD in economics, associate professor at the Faculty of Management, AGH University of Krakow, Poland. Her research interests include environmental policy, environmental reporting and corporate finance.

References

  1. Alzakri, S. (2023). Does financial stability inspire environmental innovation? Empirical insights from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 416, 137896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137896 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137896
  2. Barbera, A., & McConnell, V. (1990). The impact of environmental regulations on industry productivity: Direct and indirect effects. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18, 50-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(90)90051-Y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(90)90051-Y
  3. Biscione, A., Caruso, R., & de Felice, A. (2021). Environmental innovation in European transition countries. Applied Economics, 53(5), 521-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1808185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1808185
  4. Bolívar–Ramos, M.T. (2023). The impact of corporate science on environmental innovations: the role of universities and research institutions. R&D Management, 53(3), 503-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12574 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12574
  5. Botta, E., & Koźluk, T. (2014). Measuring Environmental Policy Stringency in OECD Countries: A Composite Index Approach. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 1177, 1-45, https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxrjnc45gvg-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxrjnc45gvg-en
  6. Brunnermeier, S.B., & Cohen, M.A. (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45(2), 278-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00058-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00058-X
  7. D’Amato, A., Mazzanti, M., & Nicolli, F. (2021). Green technologies and environmental policies for sustainable development: Testing direct and indirect impacts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 309, 127060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127060
  8. Da Silva, P., Robaina, M., Meireles, M., & Madaleno, M. (2021). Eco-Innovation and Emissions Trading: A Sector Analysis for European Countries. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, 32, 5-18. http://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.6567
  9. De Santis, R., & Jona Lasinio, C. (2016). Environmental policies, innovation and productivity in the EU. Global Economy Journal, 16(4), 615-635. https://doi.org/10.1515/gej-2015-0060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/gej-2015-0060
  10. Fabrizi, A., Guarini, G., & Meliciani, V. (2018). Green patents, regulatory policies and research network policies. Research Policy, 47, 1018-1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.005
  11. Fusillo, F., Quatraro, F., & Usai, S. (2019). Going green: environmental regulation, eco-innovation and technological alliances, Working paper series. Centro Ricerche Economiche Nord Sud, 1-32.
  12. Galeotti, M., Salini, S., & Verdolini, E. (2020). Measuring environmental policy stringency: Approaches, validity, and impact on environmental innovation and energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 136, 111052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111052
  13. Hassan M., & Rousselière, D. (2022). Does increasing environmental policy stringency lead to accelerated environmental innovation? A research note. Applied Economics, 54(17), 1989-1998. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1983146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1983146
  14. Horbach, J., Oltra, V., & Belin, J. (2013). Determinants and Specificities of Eco-Innovations Compared to Other Innovations – An Econometric Analysis for the French and German Industry Based on the Community Innovation Survey. Industry and Innovation, 20, 523-543. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2013.833375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2013.833375
  15. Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of ecoinnovations by type of environmental impact. The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005
  16. Hu, X., Yu, J., & Zhong, A. (2023) The asymmetric effects of oil price shocks on green innovation. Energy Economics, 125, 106890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106890
  17. Jobert, T., Karanfil, F., & Tykhonenko, A. (2019). Degree Of Stringency Matters: Revisiting The Pollution Haven Hypothesis Based On Heterogeneous Panels And Aggregate Data. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 23, 2675-2697. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136510051700092X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S136510051700092X
  18. Johnstone, N., Haščič, I., Poirier, J., Marion, H., & Michel, C. (2012). Environmental policy stringency and technological innovation: evidence from survey data and patent counts. Applied Economics, 44(17), 2157-2170. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.560110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.560110
  19. Johnstone, N., Haščič, I., & Popp, D. (2010). Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts. Environmental and Resource Economics, 45, 133-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1
  20. Jové-Llopis, E., & Segarra-Blasco, A. (2018). Eco-innovation strategies: A panel data analysis of Spanish manufacturing firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27, 1209-1220. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2063
  21. Kemp, R., & Pontoglio, S. (2011). The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments – A typical case of the blind men and the elephant?. Ecological Economics, 72, 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.014
  22. Keshminder, J.S., & del Rio, P. (2019). The missing links? The indirect impacts of drivers on eco-innovation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(5), 1100-1118. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1789 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1789
  23. Kesidou, E., & Wu, L. (2020). Stringency of environmental regulation and eco-innovation: Evidence from the eleventh Five-Year Plan and green patents. Economics Letters, 190, 109090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109090
  24. Kiefer C.P., Del Rio Gonzalez, P., & Carrillo-Hermosilla, J. (2019). Drivers and barriers of eco-innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2246
  25. Klemetsen, M.E., Bye, B., & Raknerud, A. (2018). Can Direct Regulations Spur Innovations in Environmental Technologies? A Study on Firm-Level Patenting. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 120, 338-371 https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12201
  26. Kruse, T., Dechezleprêtre, A., Saffar, R., & Robert, L. (2022). Measuring environmental policy stringency in OECD countries: An update of the OECD composite EPS indicator, OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1703.
  27. Kufel, T. (2011). Ekonometria. Rozwiązywanie problemów z wykorzystaniem programu GRETL, PWN, Warszawa.
  28. Lee, J., Veloso, F.M., & Hounshell, D.A. (2011). Linking induced technological change, and environmental regulation: Evidence from patenting in the U.S. auto industry. Research Policy, 40, 1240-1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.06.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.06.006
  29. Nemet, G.F. (2012). Subsidies for New Technologies and Knowledge Spillovers from Learning by Doing. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31, 601-622. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21643
  30. OECD. (2016). How stringent are environmental policies? Policy perspectives. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/economy/greeneco/How-stringent-are-environmental-policies.pdf on September 6, 2023.
  31. Palage, K., Lundmark, R., & Söderholm, P. (2019). The innovation effects of renewable energy policies and their interaction: the case of solar photovoltaics. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 21, 217–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-018-0228-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-018-0228-7
  32. Pater, R., & Lewandowska, A. (2015). Human capital and innovativeness of the European Union. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(1), 31-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2014.962487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2014.962487
  33. Porter, M.E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment - Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
  34. Rehfeld K.-M., Rennings K., & Ziegler A. (2007). Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations: an empirical analysis. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.003
  35. Rubashkina, Y., Galeotti, M., & Verdolini, E. (2015). Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy, 83, 288-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.014
  36. Stucki, T., Woerter, M., Arvanitis, S., Peneder, M., & Rammer, C. (2018). How different policy instruments affect green product innovation: A differentiated perspective. Energy Policy, 114, 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.049
  37. Sun, F., Edziah, B.K., Sun, C., & Kporsu, A.K. (2019). Institutional quality, green innovation and energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 135, 111002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111002
  38. Teslenko, V., Melnikov, R., & Bazin, D. (2021). Evaluation of the impact of human capital on innovation activity in Russian regions. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 8(1), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2021.1900744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2021.1900744
  39. Tomala, J., & Urbaniec, M. (2021). Eco-innovation development in selected European and Asian countries: a comparative analysis. Ekonomia i Środowisko, 4(79), 70-86. https://doi.org/10.34659/2021/4/28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34659/2021/4/28
  40. Van Kemenade, T., & Teixeira, A.A.C. (2017). Policy stringency and (eco)-innovation performance: a cross country analysis. Journal on Innovation and Sustainability RISUS, 8(2), 34-60. https://doi.org/10.24212/2179-3565.2017v8i2p34-60 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24212/2179-3565.2017v8i2p34-60
  41. Wang, A., Si, L., & Hu, S. (2023). Can the penalty mechanism of mandatory environmental regulations promote green innovation? Evidence from China’s enterprise data. Energy Economics, 125, 106856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106856 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106856
  42. Wen, J., Zhao, X.-X., Fu, Q., & Chang, C.P. (2023). The impact of extreme weather events on green innovation: Which ones bring to the most harm?. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 188, 122322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122322
  43. Zecca, E., Pronti, A., & Chioatto, E. (2023). Environmental policies, waste and circular convergence in the European context. Insights into Regional Development, 5(3), 95-121. https://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2023.5.3(6) DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2023.5.3(6)
  44. Zhang, M., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Does environmental regulation spur innovation? Quasi-natural experiment in China. World Development, 168, 106261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106261
  45. Zhang, D., Zheng, M., Feng, G.F., & Chang, C.P. (2022). Does an environmental policy bring to green innovation in renewable energy?. Renewable Energy, 195, 1113-1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.074

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 186

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.