Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Hierarchy of responsible consumption: Analysis in the context of the needs-driven purchasing motivations

Abstract

Objective: The study aims to examine whether, and to what extent, consumer behaviours identified by them as responsible are determined by the needs-driven motivations (NDM) that emerge during their purchasing decisions. Concerning NDM, we made an analogy to Maslow’s theory. We categorised the motivations into three hierarchical levels (basic and safety needs, belonging and esteem needs, and self-actualisation).

Research Design & Methods: We presented the responsible consumption in three aspects: ecological, economic (mindful spending behaviours), and social. We conducted econometric analyses (logistic regression) using data from a survey (n=1510), based on which we developed a concept of the Hierarchy of Responsible Consumption. We can consider this Hierarchy as an extension of previous studies. The foundation of the Hierarchy consists of motives driven by basic and safety needs, which include concern for one’s health as well as financial and climate security.

Findings: A key predictor of responsible consumption turned out to be the fear of the consequences of climate change, which is consistent with other authors’ findings. The low awareness of prosocial behaviours is concerning.

Implications & Recommendations: Therefore, it seems that efforts to promote pro-ecological behaviours should be accompanied by actions promoting behaviours aimed at supporting local communities.

Contribution & Value Added: The research results also confirm the globally observed coexistence of attitudes that fit within the trends of rationalisation and environmentalism.

Keywords

responsible consumption, sustainable consumer behaviour, hierarchy of needs, motivations of responsible consumption, logistic regression

(PDF) Save

Author Biography

Maryla Bieniek-Majka

Assistant Professor in the Department of Economics, Kazimierz Wielki University in Bydgoszcz, Poland. Her research interests include the economics and organisation of enterprises, forms of market integration, the economics of sustainable development, and rural development.

Zofia Gródek-Szostak

Assistant Professor, Kraków University of Economics, Institute of Management, Department of Economics and Organisation of Enterprises, Institute of Computer Science, Accounting and Controlling, College of Management and Quality Sciences. Her research interests include innovation management, management of the technology transfer process, commercialisation of innovations, cooperation of the SME sector with business environment institutions, technological cooperation of enterprises, state aid, development of innovative rural entrepreneurship, and sustainable development.

Michał Prusinowski

Assistant Professor in the Institute of Economics and Finance, University of Szczecin, Poland. His research interests include economic inequalities, the four-day work week, and consumer behaviour.

Magdalena Szczepańska

Assistant Professor in the Department of Economics, Kazimierz Wielki University in Bydgoszcz, Poland. Her research interests include consumer behaviour, entrepreneurship and succession intentions.

Agnieszka Szczepkowska-Flis

Assistant Professor in the Department of Economics, Kazimierz Wielki University in Bydgoszcz. Her research interests include economic analyses using statistical and econometric tools, research interests include growth and economic development, creative destruction, innovative activity, technological progress, business cycle, and FDI. Assistant Professor in the Department of Economics.

Zuzanna Urbanowicz

Assistant Professor in the Department of Business Activity and Economic Policy in the Institute of Economics, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland. Her scientific interests include the theory of monetary and fiscal policy as well as business cycles. In her research, she tries to evaluate the role of economic policy instruments in the macroeconomic stabilisation process.


References

  1. Agenda 21 (United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992 AGENDA 21 Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf on June 1, 2025.
  2. Abulkhair, M. (2025). Factors affecting sustainable consumption in the era of consumerism: an empirical study in the context of circular economy. jier, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.52783/jier.v5i1.2006
  3. Altın, B., & Kırçova, İ. (2024). Çevresel, sosyal ve ekonomik sürdürülebilirlik bilincinin ve algılanan tüketici etkinliğinin sürdürülebilir tüketim bağlamında incelenmesi. Business and Management Studies an International Journal, 12(3), 571-599. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v12i3.2399
  4. Amrilah, D. (2024). Consumerism and materialism culture: its impact on society and the environment. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t79cw
  5. Ballesteros, C. (2019). Taxonomy for “Homo Consumens” in a 3.0 Era. In M. Khosrow-Pour, D.B.A. (Ed.), Advanced Methodologies and Technologies in Digital Marketing and Entrepreneurship (pp. 97-105). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7766-9.ch008
  6. Bee & Desmarais-Tremblay. (2022). “The birth of homo œconomicus: the methodological debate on the economic agent from J. S. Mill to V. Pareto”. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1053837221000535
  7. Caeiro, S., Ramos, T., & Huisingh, D. (2012). Procedures and criteria to develop and evaluate household sustainable consumption indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 27, 72-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.026
  8. Çapık, C., & Gözüm, S. (2015). Psychometric Features of an Assessment Instrument with Likert and Dichotomous Response Formats. Public Health Nursing, 32(1), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/PHN.12156
  9. Chazhaeva, M. (2023). The challenge of achieving sustainable consumption (I International Conference “Biotechnologies in the Context of Human Development”). BIO Web of Conferences, 76, 07004. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20237607004
  10. Clayton, S., & Karazsia, B.T. (2020). Development and validation of a measure of climate change anxiety. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101434
  11. Cuong, D. (2024). Positive emotions influencing consumer shopping behavior on e-commerce platforms. Management and Marketing, 19, 15-31. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2024-0002
  12. Ersoy, N. (2022). A cross section from the consumer perspective on sustainable nutrition: consumer awareness and motivation status. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1810726/v1
  13. Fathonah, N., & Nastiti, A. (2024). How does gender affect pro-environmental behaviours? the case of a University in Bandung, Indonesia. E3s Web of Conferences, 485, 07004. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448507004
  14. Fredstrom, W.G. (2023). Reforming Homo Consumens: Consumer Culture, Consumerism, and Contemporary Christian Witness. Lutheran Mission Matters, 205. Retrieved from https://lsfm.global/uploads/Nov%202023/06_Fredstrom_Nov2023_Web.pdf on June 2, 2025.
  15. Fromm, E. (1965). The application of humanist psychoanalysis to Marx’s theory. In Socialist humanism: An international symposium (pp. 207-222). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  16. Gao, Y., Shao, C., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Young consumers’ responsibility for sustainable consumption and the preference of local brands. Sustainability, 15(7), 6134. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076134
  17. Ghaffar, A., Zaidi, S.S., & Islam, T. (2023). An investigation of sustainable consumption behavior: The influence of environmental concern and trust in sustainable producers on consumer xenocentrism. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 34(1), https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-05-2022-0153
  18. Gierszewska, G., & Seretny, M. (2018). Odpowiedzialna konsumpcja. Konieczność zmiany zachowań konsumentów i postaw biznesowych. In Grabowska, M., & Kluth, K. (Ed). Przedsiębiorczośc i zarządzanie talentami. Wybrane zagadnienia (pp. 133-145). Politechnika Warszawska.
  19. Gruszczyński, M. (2012). Mikroekonometria. Modele i metody analizy danych indywidualnych. Wolters Kluwer Business. Warszawa.
  20. Han, J., Woodside, A., & Ko, E. (2024). Does consumer knowledge about sustainable-fashion impact intention-to-buy?. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 36(10), 2390-2410. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjml-05-2023-0456
  21. Hasbi, M., Munajat, M., & Qoyum, A. (2023). A conceptual framework of the islamic human development index (i-hdi) and its relationship with maqāṣid al-sharī’ah. Amwaluna Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Syariah, 7(2), 258-273. https://doi.org/10.29313/amwaluna.v7i2.10910
  22. Helm, S.V., Pollitt, A., Barnett, M.A., Curran, M.A., & Craig, Z.R. (2018). Differentiating environmental concern in the context of psychological adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 48, 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.012
  23. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S1053837221000535
  24. Kaur, T., & Luchs, M.G. (2021). Mindfulness enhances the values that promote sustainable consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 39(5), 990-1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21636
  25. Keyzer, F. (2023). #thisissustainable: the effect of disclosures in influencer marketing for sustainable food. Sustainability, 15(12), 9501. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129501
  26. Koo,M., & Yang, Shih-Wei (2025). Likert-Type Scale. Encyclopedia, 5(18), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5010018
  27. Kufel. T. (2007). Ekonometria. Rozwiązywanie problemów z wykorzystaniem programu GRETL. PWN. Warszawa.
  28. Kumar, K. (2024). The rise of ethical consumerism: exploring factors influencing buying behavior and business strategies. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(4), 8190-8197. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.0424.10126
  29. Laurett, R., do Paço, A.M.F., & Mainardes, E.W. (2019). Sustainable Consumer Lifestyles/Sustainable Consumption Published Online: 2019-01-16. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dilinna-Nwobi/publication/348719081_De-risking_Investment_in_Power_Projects/links/6034d1654585158939c2d134/De-risking-Investment-in-Power-Projects.pdf on June 2, 2024.
  30. Li, W., Wang, H., Zhang, L., & Liu, R. (2023). Digital inclusive finance, consumer consumption and high-quality economic development. Plos One, 18(8), e0285695. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285695
  31. Liobikienė, G., & Brizga, J. (2022). Sustainable consumption in the baltic states: the carbon footprint in the household sector. Sustainability, 14(3), 1567. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031567
  32. Liu, H. (2024). Creative practice in a sustainable green village? Connection of service design identity and pro-environmental behavior. IWI, 43(2), 01-15. https://doi.org/10.52783/iwi.v43i2.66
  33. Fuchs, D., & Lorek, S. (2005). Sustainable consumption governance: A history of promises and failures. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28(3), 261-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-005-8490-z
  34. Luchs, M.G., & Miller, R.A. (2015). Consumer responsibility for sustainable consumption. In L. A. Reisch & J. Thøgersen (Eds.), Handbook of research on sustainable consumption (pp. 254-267). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783471270.00027
  35. Mariyappan, N., & Sangeetha, G. (2024). A study on consumer education towards external stimuli affecting online shopping behavior–analysis using jamovi. Kuey. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i4.1922
  36. Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
  37. Mehmood, K., Jabeen, F., Iyanna, S., Zhang, H., Piccardi, P., & Nehra, N. (2024). Exploring drivers of behavioral willingness to reduce plastic consumption and socially responsible consumption behavior. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(4), 3098-3118. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2731
  38. Mesaifer, N., & Alrasheed, R. (2025). The long-term impact of the covid-19 pandemic on sustainable development and consumption in the kingdom of bahrain. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(10), 2025313. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025313
  39. Meshram, A.S. (2023). Relevance of Abraham Maslow’s theory to contemporary consumer behavior. International Journal of Humanities, Social Science and Management, 3(6), 642-644.
  40. Morgan, C.J., Croney, C.C., & Widmar, N.J.O. (2016). Exploring Relationships between Ethical Consumption, Lifestyle Choices, and Social Responsibility. Advances in Applied Sociology, 6, 199-216. https://doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2016.65017
  41. Prymon-Ryś, E. (2017). Wolontariat i filantropia jako przejawy konsumpcji zrównoważonej w warunkach polskich. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, (501), (pp. 96-105).
  42. Rahimah, A., Do, B., Le, A., & Cheng, J. (2024). Commitment to and connection with green brands: Perspectives of consumer social responsibility and terror management theory. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 33(3), 314-329. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-11-2022-4214
  43. Reichheld, A., Peto, J., & Ritthaler, C. (2023). Research: Consumers’ sustainability demands are rising. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2023/09/research-consumers-sustainability-demands-are-rising. on June 2, 2024.
  44. Santuso, W., Musadiеq, M., Hidayat, K., & Sunarti, S. (2024). A systematic literature review: determinants analysis of purchase decision. Kne Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i11.15774
  45. Schlaile, M.P., Klein, K., & Böck, W. (2018). From bounded morality to consumer social responsibility: A transdisciplinary approach to socially responsible consumption and its obstacles. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(3), 561-588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3096-8
  46. Shen, Y. (2024). Impact factors for sustainable consumption in todays world. Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences, 114(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/114/2024bj0147
  47. Stanisz, A. (2016). Modele regresji logistycznej. Zastosowanie w medycynie, naukach przyrodniczych i społecznych. StatSoft Polska. Kraków.
  48. Stanley, S.K., Hogg, T.L., Leviston, Z., & Walker, I. (2021). Climate change anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(12), e863-e873. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00278-3
  49. Szczepańska, M. (2024). Responsible consumption in the purchasing decisions of young consumers. Humanities and Social Sciences, 31(1), (pp. 175-185). https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2024.hss.12
  50. Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2011). Needs and subjective well-being around the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 354-365. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023779
  51. Testa, F., Gusmerotti, N., Iorio, V., & Frey, M. (2025). Does a paradoxical frame encourage green behavior in consumers?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(4), 4695-4716. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4226
  52. Tien, Y., & Huang, J. (2023). Gender differences in pro-environmental behavioural intentions, environmental values, tolerance of environmental protection cost, and confidence in citizen participation in environmental policies during the covid-19 pandemic in Taiwan. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 32(5), 4813-4823. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/168851
  53. Tsaurai, K. (2021). Macroeconomic determinants of energy consumption in brics (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa). International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, IX (Issue 2), 405-423. https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/711
  54. United Nations. (1992). Agenda 21: Programme of action for sustainable development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf on June 2, 2024.
  55. Wahba, M.A., & Bridwell, L.G. (1976). Maslow reconsidered: A review of research on the need hierarchy theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15(2), 212-240.
  56. White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D.J. (2019). How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919825649
  57. Yue, B., Sheng, G., She, S., & Xu, J. (2020). Impact of Consumer Environmental Responsibility on Green Consumption Behavior in China: The Role of Environmental Concern and Price Sensitivity. Sustainability, 12(5), 2074. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052074
  58. Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y., Liu, Y., & Xiao, Z. (2023). Research on the influencing mechanism of the effect of brands’ sustainable behaviors on consumer attitudes: an empirical study on clothing brands. Sustainability, 15(3), 2351. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032351
  59. Zhenyu, H., Li, X., Jiajun, L., Zhang, X., & Hong-liang, S. (2021). Study on countermeasures to improve college students’willingness of participation in body donation based on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Research in Health Science, 6(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.22158/rhs.v6n2p59
  60. Zhou, R. (2022). Sustainable economic development, digital payment, and consumer demand: evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), 8819. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148819
  61. Zuniga, J. (2023). Megatrends: Understanding Sustainable Consumers 2023 Key Insights. Retrieved from https://www.euromonitor.com/article/megatrends-understanding-sustainable-consumers-2023-key-insights on June 2, 2024.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 116

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.