Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017)
March 2017: Challenges for International Business in Central and Eastern Europe

Articles

Tax changes in the EU-13 during the recent financial crisis

Published 2017-02-10

  • Nika Šimurina
    • ,
  • Dajana Barbić

Nika Šimurina
University of Zagreb

Dajana Barbić
University of Zagreb

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15678/PM.2017.0301.08

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to identify tax changes during the recent financial crisis across EU-13 member states. The recent financial and fiscal crises have changed taxation trends in a large number of EU member states. The member states have been hit differently by the crisis depending mostly on the different degree of macroeconomic imbalances in the economy. Therefore policy responses varied among them and were strongly connected with macroeconomic and fiscal conditions. The tax systems in the EU-13 are transparent, neutral, and straightforward, though not necessarily efficient. In terms of the tax structure, most EU-15 member states raise roughly equal shares of tax revenues from direct taxes, indirect taxes, and social contributions, while the EU-13 member states often display a substantially lower share of direct taxes in total tax revenues. The paper includes theoretical background, comparison of present differences among the taxation systems of the EU-13 member states, and advantages and disadvantages of different types of taxes.

Keywords

PIT, CIT, VAT, crisis, EU-13 member states

PDF

References

  1. Alesina, A., Ardagna, S. (2010). Large Changes in Fiscal Policy: Taxes versus Spending. Tax Policy and the Economy, The University of Chicago Press, 24, 35-68.
  2. Alesina, A., Ardagna, S. (2013). The Design of Fiscal Adjustments. Tax Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, 27, 19 – 67.
  3. Alesina, A., Giavazzi, F. (ur.) (2012). Fiscal Policy after the Great Recession, University of Chicago Press and NBER.
  4. Alesina, A., Perotti, R. (1995). Fiscal Expansions and Adjustments in OECD Countries. Economic Policy, 21, 207-247.
  5. Alvaredo, F., Atkinson, B. A., Piketty, T., Saez, E. (2013). The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 3-20.
  6. Arnold, J. M., Brys, B., Heady, C., Johansson, Å., Schwellnus, C. and Vartia, L. (2011). Tax Policy for Economic Recovery and Growth, The Economic Journal, 121(55), F59–F80.
  7. Auerbach, A. J., (2012). The fall and rise of Keynesian fiscal policy. Asian Economic Policy Review, 7 (2),.157–175.
  8. Cnossen, S. (2002). Tax policy in the European Union: A review of issues and options. CESifo Working Paper, 758.
  9. Corneo, G. (2005). The Rise and Likely Fall of the German Income Tax. CESifo Economic Studies, 51 (1) 159-186.
  10. European Commission, (2011). Tax reforms in EU: Tax policy challenges for economic growth and fiscal sustainability. Taxation Papers, Working paper, 28. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  11. European Commission, (2012). Tax reforms in EU Member States, Tax policy challenges for economic growth and fiscal Sustainability 2012 Report.
  12. European Commission, (2013). Tax reforms in EU Member States, Tax policy challenges for economic growth and fiscal Sustainability 2013 Report.
  13. Eurostat (2015). Taxation trends in the European Union, Statistical books, available on: http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/documents/taxation/gen_info/economic_analysis/tax_structures/2015/report.pdf
  14. Feldstein, M. (2009). Rethinking the Role of Fiscal Policy. American Economic Review, 99(2), 556-559.
  15. Gemmell, N., Kneller, R., and Sanz, I. (2011). The Timing and Persistence of Fiscal Policy
  16. Impacts on Growth: Evidence from OECD Countries. The Economic Journal, 121(550), F33-F58.
  17. Giavazzi, F., Jappelli, T., and Pagano, M. (2000). Searching for Non‐linear Effects of Fiscal Policy: Evidence from Industrial and Developing Countries. European Economic Review. 44 (7), 1259–89.
  18. Hall, R. E, and Rabushka, A. (1985). The Flat Tax, Stanford: Hoover Press Publication.
  19. Kneller, R., Bleaney, M., Gemmell, N. (1999). Fiscal policy and growth: evidence from OECD
  20. Countries. Journal of Public Economics, 74, 171-190.
  21. Mountford, A., and Uhlig, H. (2008). What Are the Effects of Fiscal Policy Shocks? Working Paper, 14551, NBER, Cambridge, MA.
  22. Piketty, T., Saez, E, Stantacheva, S. (2011). Optimal Taxation of Top Labor Incomes: A Tale of Three Elasticies, Working Paper No. 17616, NBER, Cambridge, MA.
  23. Romer, C., and Romer, D. (2010). The Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Changes: Estimates Based on a New Measure of Fiscal Shocks, American Economic Review, 100 (3), 763-801.
  24. Stiglitz, J. (2012). The Price of Inequality – How Today′s Divided Society Endangers our Future, New York, London: W. W. Norton & Company.
  25. Šimurina, N., Primorac., M. (2014). The role of tax policy in the fiscal recovery of the European Union, Zbornik radova međunarodne znanstvene konferencije Tax reforms:
  26. experiences and perspectives, Blažič, H., Ott, K., Šimović, H. (urednici), IJF, Zagreb, 219-237.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

141-150 of 163

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.