Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2018)
5th AIB-CEE 2018 Conference Proceedings | 9th ENTRE 2018 Conference Proceedings (Special Issue)

Articles

Requirements of scaling international social enterprises

Published 2018-09-12

  • Marek Ćwiklicki

Marek Ćwiklicki
Cracow University of Economics

Abstract

The paper aims to identify the requirements for social enterprise to scale internationally. The explicit research objective is to explain which requirements enable to scale social ventures internationally with success. The study employs multiple case study analysis based on systematic literature review used to identify papers examining international social enterprises. At total six cases were analysed using criteria of organisational capabilities included in the SCALERS model. The analysis showed that the most significant for scaling social enterprises internationally are: earnings-generation and alliance building; next staffing, communicating, and replicating. The less significant are lobbing and stimulating market forces. Existence of strong business model, neutral from market sources, well-resourced, recognised in public sphere associated with scaling up. The paper contributes by revealing that capabilities for ISEs scaling are differentiated in terms of their significance. Presented results go along with the observation that prior to scaling social impact basic operational model must show its viability.

Keywords

social entrepreneurship, internationalization, scaling, SCALERS

PDF

References

  1. Abbou, I., Gidron, B., Buber-Ben David, N., Greenberg, Y., Monnickendam-Givon, Y., & Navon, A. (2017). Social enterprise in Israel: the swinging pendulum between collectivism and individu-alism. Social Enterprise Journal, 13(4, SI), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-09-2017-0043
  2. Agrawal, S., & Gugnani, R. (2014). Creating successful business model: lessons for social entre-preneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation Management, 18(5/6), 438–445. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2014.064720
  3. Bennett, E. A. (2016). Governance, legitimacy, and stakeholder balance: lessons from Fairtrade International. Social Enterprise Journal, 12(3), 322–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-08-2016-0038
  4. Bloom, P. N., & Chatterji, A. K. (2009). Scaling Social Entrepreneurial Impact. California Manage-ment Review, 51(3), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166496
  5. Bloom, P. N., & Skloot, E. (Eds.). (2010). Scaling Social Impact. New Thinking. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113565
  6. Bloom, P. N., & Smith, B. R. (2010a). Identifying the Drivers of Social Entrepreneurial Impact: Theoretical Development and an Exploratory Empirical Test of SCALERS. Journal of Social En-trepreneurship, 1(1), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420670903458042
  7. Bloom, P. N., & Smith, B. R. (2010b). Indentifying the Drivers of Social Entrepreneurial Impact: An Exploratory Empirical Study. In Scaling Social Impact. New Thinking (pp. 11–27).
  8. Bradach, J. (2010). Scaling Impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Summer.
  9. Brouard, F., & Elson, P. R. (2014). International Comparison of Social Enterprise Models (ICSEM). Canadian Journal of Nonprofit & Social Economy Research / Revue Canadienne de Recherche Sur Les OSBL et l’économie Sociale, 5(1), 3–5.
  10. Cannatelli, B. (2017). Exploring the Contingencies of Scaling Social Impact: A Replication and Ex-tension of the SCALERS Model. Voluntas, 28(6), 2707–2733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9789-x
  11. Davis, S. (2016). Relocating Development Communication: Social Entrepreneurship, International Networking, and South-South Cooperation in the Viva Rio NGO. International Journal of Communication, 10, 42–59.
  12. Dees, G. J., Anderson, B. B., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2004). Scaling social impact. Strategies for spread-ing social innovations. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring, 24–32.
  13. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2017). Mapping social enterprise models: some evidence from the “ICSEM” project. Social Enterprise Journal, 13(4, SI), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-09-2017-0049
  14. Desa, G. (2012). Resource Mobilization in International Social Entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a Mechanism of Institutional Transformation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(4), 727–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00430.x
  15. Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12028
  16. Frances, W., & Antadze, N. (2010). Making a Difference: Strategies for Scaling Social Innovation for Greater Impact. Innovation Journal, 15(2), 1–19.
  17. Friedrich, D. S. (2014). Global microlending in education reform: Enseñá por Argentina and the Neoliberalization of the grassroots. Comparative Education Review, 58(2), 296–321. https://doi.org/10.1086/675412
  18. Galera, G., & Borzaga, C. (2009). Social enterprise. Social Enterprise Journal, 5(3), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508610911004313
  19. Galvin, M., & Iannotti, L. (2015). Social Enterprise and Development: The KickStart Model. Volun-tas: International Journal of Voluntary & Nonprofit Organizations, 26(2), 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9424-z
  20. Jack, S. L., & Anderson, A. R. (2002). The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(5), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00076-3
  21. Jones, M. V., Coviello, N., & Tang, Y. K. (2011). International Entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): A domain ontology and thematic analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(6), 632–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.04.001
  22. Keupp, M. M., & Gassmann, O. (2009). The Past and the Future of International Entrepreneurship: A Review and Suggestions for Developing the Field. Journal of Management, 35(3), 600–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330558
  23. Kowalik, I., Danik, L., Král, P., & Řezanková, H. (2017). Antecedents of Accelerated Internationalisa-tion of Polish and Czech Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(3), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050302
  24. Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (2005). Defining International Entrepreneurship and Modeling the Speed of Internationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00097.x
  25. Sarasvathy, S., Kumar, K., York, J. G., & Bhagavatula, S. (2014). An Effectual Approach to Interna-tional Entrepreneurship: Overlaps, Challenges, and Provocative Possibilities. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12088
  26. Tukamushaba, E., Orobia, L., & George, B. (2011). Development of a conceptual model to under-stand international social entrepreneurship and its application in the Ugandan context. Jour-nal of International Entrepreneurship, 9(4), 282–298.
  27. Walske, J. M., & Tyson, L. D. (2015). Built to Scale. A Comparative Case Analysis, Assessing How Social Enterprises Scale. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 16(4), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.5367/ijei.2015.0197
  28. Weber, C., Kröger, A., & Lambrich, K. (2012). Scaling social enterprises – a theoretically grounded framework. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 32(19), 1–15.
  29. Westley, F., Antadze, N., Riddell, D. J., Robinson, K., & Geobey, S. (2014). Five Configurations for Scaling Up Social Innovation. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(3), 234–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886314532945
  30. Yang, Y., & Wu, S. (2015). An Exploratory Study to Understand the Internationalization Strategies of Social Enterprises. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2014.954255
  31. Zahra, S. A., Newey, L. R., & Li, Y. (2014). On the Frontiers: The Implications of Social Entrepre-neurship for International Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 38(1), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12061

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.