Entrepreneurial activity in Turkey: A statistical overview for the years of 2006-2020
Objective: The objective of the article is to understand the development of Turkish entrepreneurial activity over the last 15 years.
Research Design & Methods: The research design employed in this article is a quantitative one, mainly by utilizing the data available from Global Entrepreneurship Monitor and Eurostat to map the structure and the development of Turkish entrepreneurial activity between 2006 and 2020. With respect to gender, age and education status of Turkish self-employed, the article also employs a chi-square test of association.
Findings: The main empirical results of this article identify that whereas the overall share of self-employed among the active Turkish population dropped from 24% in 2006 to 17% in 2020, this is not only above the EU-27 average, but also largely due to a drop in the share of own account workers. The article highlights that over the duration of 15 years, the share of job creators among the active Turkish population remained stable despite all the negative events occurred in Turkey. The article also identifies a gender imbalance in terms of self-employment, and a significant difference between educational background of own account workers and job creators.
Implications & Recommendations: Understanding the patterns of development of Turkish entrepreneurial economic activity in the last 15 years can serve as a point of departure for both entrepreneurship researchers and policymakers. For entrepreneurship researchers, the case not only allows for a cross-national comparison, but also delivers empirical evidence from a transition country. For policymakers, fluctuations in the number of own account workers deserve more attention whereas stability of job creators can be further analysed for understanding what makes this group particularly stable despite all the negative events that occurred over the last decade.
Contribution & Value Added: The study contributes to the literature by offering a current overview of Turkish entrepreneurial activity in the last 15 years. Since the literature on Turkish entrepreneurship is primarily dominated by topics such as students’ entrepreneurial intentions, women entrepreneurship or migrant entrepreneurship, the study offers empirical evidence to see the bigger picture of Turkish entrepreneurial economic activity.
Entrepreneurial activity; self-employment; Turkey
Aktürk, O. (2021). Osmanlı’dan Cumhuriyete Ahilik, Küçük Esnaf ve Girişimcilik Kültürü. In H. Y. Taş, M. Küçükoğlu, & M. Demirdöğmez (Eds.), Girişimcilik ve KOBİ Araştırmaları (pp. 29-55).
Akyar, D., & Sarıkaya, R. (2020). Content Analysis of Graduate Theses on the Concept of Entrepreneurship in The Field of Education in Turkey. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(3), 979-1018.
Ármane, S., Gärtig, S. İ., Gärtig, R., Tegtmeier, S., & Brem, A. (2021). STEM educated women entrepreneurs in Denmark, Latvia and Turkey: a context-based explorative study. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 13(2), 186. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2021.114409
Baktır, Z., & Watson, F. (2021). Trust-Driven Entrepreneurship for Community Well-Being of Refugees and Their Local Hosts. Journal of Macromarketing, 41(2), 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146720935157
Baluku, M. M., Onderi, P., & Otto, K. (2021). Predicting self-employment intentions and entry in Germany and East Africa: an investigation of the impact of mentoring, entrepreneurial attitudes, and psychological capital. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 33(3), 289-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2019.1666337
Benazzouz, N. M. (2019). Entrepreneurial orientation and innovation intensity: A synthetic literature review. International Entrepreneurship Review, 5(2), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2019.0502.02
Birelma, A. (2019). Working-class entrepreneurialism: Perceptions, aspirations, and experiences of petty entrepreneurship among male manual workers in Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey, 61, 45-70. https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2019.18
Bozoğlu Batı, G., & Armutlulu, İ. H. (2020). Work and family conflict analysis of female entrepreneurs in Turkey and classification with rough set theory. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0498-0
Buenstorf, G. (2007). Creation and Pursuit of Entrepreneurial Opportunities: An Evolutionary Economics Perspective. Small Business Economics, 28(4), 323-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9039-5
Çetindamar, D., Gupta, V. K., Karadeniz, E. E., & Eğrican, N. (2012). What the numbers tell: The impact of human, family and financial capital on women and men’s entry into entrepreneurship in Turkey. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(1-2), 29-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2012.637348
Chang, C. (2021). The economically rich refugees: A case study of the business operations of Istanbul‐based Syrian refugee businesspeople. International Migration, imig.12886. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12886
Davidsson, P. (2015). Data replication and extension: A commentary. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 3, 12-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2015.02.001
Dvouletý, O. (2019). Development of Entrepreneurial Activity in the Czech Republic over the Years 2005–2017. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(3), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5030038
Dvouletý, O., & Orel, M. (2020). Individual determinants of entrepreneurship in Visegrád countries: Reflection on GEM data from the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(4), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080407
Erdoğan, Z. (2020). Eşikler ve Değerler Bağlamında Kırsalda Kadın Örgütlenmeleri: Bursa Üreten Kadın Dernekleri Federasyonu Örneği. Journal of Planning. https://doi.org/10.14744/planlama.2020.46794
Erkut, B. (2016). Product Innovation and Market Shaping: Bridging the Gap with Cognitive Evolutionary Economics. Indraprastha Journal of Management, 4(2), 3-24.
Erkut, B. (2020). Hayek on Product Innovation and Market Shaping: Opening the Black Box. Liberal Düşünce Dergisi, 25(100), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.36484/liberal.757980
Eurostat. (2021a). Active Population by Sex, Age and Citizenship (1 000). http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=lfsa_agan&lang=en
Eurostat. (2021b). Self-Employment by Sex, Age and Country of Birth (1 000). http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=lfsa_esgacob&lang=en
Eurostat. (2021c). Self-Employment by Sex, Age and Educational Attainment Level (1 000). http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=lfsa_esgaed&lang=en
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. (2021a). Total early-stage entrepreneurial activity, established business ownership, perceived opportunities.
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. (2021b). Total early-stage entrepreneurial activity, established business ownership, perceived opportunities. www.gemconsortium.org/data
Gözüm, A. G. (2019). A Categorical Review of Academic Papers on Entrepreneurship: Academic Pattern of Entrepreneurship in Turkey. Ufuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(15), 367-385.
Guerrero, M., Liñán, F., & Cáceres-Carrasco, F. R. (2020). The influence of ecosystems on the entrepreneurship process: a comparison across developed and developing economies. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00392-2
Gürel, E., Madanoğlu, M., & Altınay, L. (2021). Gender, risk-taking and entrepreneurial intentions: assessing the impact of higher education longitudinally. Education + Training, 63(5), 777-792. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-08-2019-0190
Hayek, F. A. von. (2002). Competition as a Discovery Procedure. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 5(3), 9-23.
Herbert, R. F., & Link, A. N. (1989). In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 1(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389915
Kachkar, O. A. (2019). Refugee Entrepreneurship: Empirical Quantitative Evidence on Microenterprises in Refugee Camps in Turkey. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 17(3), 333-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2018.1479913
Kurteğe Sefer, B. (2020). A gender- and class-sensitive explanatory model for rural women entrepreneurship in Turkey. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 12(2), 191-210. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-07-2019-0113
Oğuztimur, Ş., & Seçkin, E. (2018). Entrepreneurship as an Instrument of Regional Development. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.357437
Öner, M. A., & Kunday, Ö. (2016). A study on Schumpeterian and Kirznerian entrepreneurship in Turkey: 2006–2013. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102, 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.09.005
Özcan, N. A., Şahin, S., & Çankır, B. (2021). The validity and reliability of thriving scale in academic context: Mindfulness, GPA, and entrepreneurial intention among university students. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01590-1
Schwab, K. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. World Economic Forum.
Sharma, G. D., Shah, M. I., Shahzad, U., Jain, M., & Chopra, R. (2021). Exploring the nexus between agriculture and greenhouse gas emissions in BIMSTEC region: The role of renewable energy and human capital as moderators. Journal of Environmental Management, 297, 113316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113316
Sharma, G. D., Thomas, A., & Paul, J. (2021). Reviving tourism industry post-COVID-19: A resilience-based framework. Tourism Management Perspectives, 37, 100786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100786
Sharma, G. D., Tiwari, A. K., Jain, M., Yadav, A., & Srivastava, M. (2021). COVID-19 and environmental concerns: A rapid review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 148, 111239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111239
Sharma, G. D., Tiwari, A. K., Talan, G., & Jain, M. (2021). Revisiting the sustainable versus conventional investment dilemma in COVID-19 times. Energy Policy, 156, 112467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112467
Solomon, S., Bendickson, J. S., Liguori, E. W., & Marvel, M. R. (2021). The effects of social spending on entrepreneurship in developed nations. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00458-9
Stoica, O., Roman, A., & Rusu, V. D. (2020). The Nexus between Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: A Comparative Analysis on Groups of Countries. Sustainability, 12(3), 1186. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031186
Turkish Statistical Institute. (2020). Küçük ve Orta Büyüklükteki Girişim İstatistikleri, 2019.
Turkish Statistical Institute. (2021a). Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Kayıt Sistemi Sonuçları, 2020. https://data. tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=The-Results-of-Address-Based-Population-Registration-System-2020-37210
Turkish Statistical Institute. (2021b). İstatistiklerle Gençlik, 2020.
Witt, U. (2008). What is specific about evolutionary economics? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18(5), 547–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-008-0107-7
Witt, U. (2014). The future of evolutionary economics: why the modalities of explanation matter. Journal of Institutional Economics, 10(4), 645-664. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137414000253
Yalçıntaş, M., İyigün, Ö., & Karabulut, G. (2021). Personal Characteristics and Intention for Entrepreneurship. The Singapore Economic Review, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590821500338
Zutshi, A., Mendy, J., Sharma, G. D., Thomas, A., & Sarker, T. (2021). From Challenges to Creativity: Enhancing SMEs’ Resilience in the Context of COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(12), 6542. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126542
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. The author agrees to publish his article free of charge in the journal "International Entrepreneurship Review" (IER) in the language of the above publication (English). The editorial staff reserves the right to shorten texts and to change titles.
2. The journal allows the authors to keep their copyrights (the copyright) in accordance with the license: Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 from 2023 (since vol. 9, no 1). By the end of 2022 we published under Creative Commons CC BY-ND 4.0.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) only the final version of the article, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise to use any of the following research society portals: