Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 8 No. 4 (2022)
December 2022

Articles

New-generation trade agreement with Japan: Significance to EU Companies

https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2022.0804.03

Published 2022-12-31

  • Małgorzata Czermińska

Małgorzata Czermińska
Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University

Abstract

Objective: The New-generation trade agreements, which include the agreement with Japan, provide wide coverage – not only the liberalisation of trade in goods or services but also the protection of intellectual property rights, the public procurement market, sustainable development and others. This paper aims to demonstrate key provisions and (both ex post and ex ante) opportunities that the agreement creates for EU companies.

Research Design & Methods: The research methods include a critical review of existing literature, an analysis of relevant legal and official documents of the European Union, as well as the provisions of the EU-Japan trade agreement. The empirical research focused on Eurostat data.

Findings: The provisions of the EU-Japan agreement provide an incentive for European companies to strengthen their position on the Japanese market. The elimination of import duties and other barriers to trade in Japan in relation to certain agricultural products on the entry into force of the agreement contributed to higher exports from the EU for these groups of goods. What might be expected is the additional effect of the liberalisation of bilateral trade on third countries. In fact, standards or rules agreed by Japan and the EU may become even more attractive to third countries, as their adoption would facilitate access to two large markets.

Implications & Recommendations: Japan is a relatively important trading partner for the EU and vice versa. One of the biggest achievements of the agreement made between the European Union and Japan includes the wide and deep liberalisation of trade in goods. Despite the fact that the overall level of tariff protection is relatively low, there are still some groups of goods for which the protection in the form of customs duties constitutes an important barrier, as a result of which the conditions for competing on the partner’s market deteriorate. It seems that EU entrepreneurs should make more use of the opportunities which are created by the provisions of the free trade agreement with Japan. So far, the trade crisis caused by the pandemic has stood in the way.

Contribution & Value Added: Research conducted so far is of an ex ante nature, both regarding the provisions of the agreement (publications written before 2018) and the evaluation of its potential effects on economy, trade, production or selected sectors. The research carried out in this article is of an ex post nature; it covers the period following the entry into force of the agreement and does not present any growth scenarios or forecasts, as was the case in the existing research. The article attempted to juxtapose the provisions of the agreement with Japan with trade conditions applicable to EU companies, as well as with the growth rate, volume and coverage of bilateral trade in goods.

Keywords

new-generation trade agreement, free trade agreements (FTAs), Japan, the European Union, customs duties, non-tariff barriers

(PDF) Save

Author Biography

Małgorzata Czermińska

She obtained a doctoral degree and a habilitation degree at the Cracow University of Economics. Her research interests include common trade policy of the European Union and its instruments, the common market of the European Union and the exercise of Its fundamental freedoms, facilitation and ensuring security in cross-border trade in goods.

References

  1. Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership, OJ L 330, 27.12.2018, 3-899.
  2. Ambroziak, Ł. (2017). Potencjalny wpływ umowy o partnerstwie gospodarczym UE – Japonia na polski handel rolno-spożywczy z Japonią [The potential impact of EU–Japan EPA on Polish agri-food trade with Japan], Gospodarka Regionalna i Międzynarodowa, 53(2), 117-129.
  3. Atlantic Council (2018). JEEPA – Japan-EU Free Trade Agreement Leaves the US Out in the Cold. Retrieved May 11, 2022, from https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/econographics/jeepa-japan-eu-free-trade-agreement-leaves-the-us-out-in-the-cold/
  4. Benz S., & Yalcin, E. (2015). Productivity versus Employment: Quantifying the Economic Effects of an EU–Japan Free Trade Agreement, The World Economy, 38(6), 935-961. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12205
  5. Drelich-Skulska, B., & Bobowski, S. (2021). Intra-industry trade and implications of the European Union-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement from the perspective of the automotive industry. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(2), 183-206. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2021.090212
  6. European Commission (2006). Global Europe: competing in the world: a contribution to the EU’s growth and jobs strategy, COM/2005/100 final, 1-18.
  7. European Commission (2010). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, The Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Trade, Growth and World Affairs, COM(2010) 612 final, {SEC(2010 1268}, 1-22.
  8. European Commission (2012). Commission Staff Working Document. Impact Assessment Report on EU-Japan Trade Relations, Accompanying the document Recommendation for a Council Decision authorising the opening of negotiations on a Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and Japan, SWD(2012) 209 final, 1-103.
  9. European Commission (2016a). Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and Japan. Retrieved May 10, 2022, from https://ec.europa.eu/chafea/agri/content/trade-sustainability-impact-assessment-free-trade-agreement-between-european-union-and-japan
  10. European Commission (2016b). Directorate-General for Trade, Directorate C – Asia and Latin America, Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment of the Free Trade, Agreement between the European Union and Japan. Final Report, 1-314.
  11. European Commission (2017a). EU-Japan EPA – The Agreement in Principle, Directorate-General for Trade. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/july/tradoc_155693.doc.pdf.
  12. European Commission (2017b). Report of the 18th EU-Japan FTA/EPA Negotiating Round Tokyo, Week of 3 April 2017. Retrieved June 10, 2022, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/april/tradoc_155506.pdf
  13. European Commission (2018a). Key Elements of the EU Japan Economic Partnership Agreement, December 12. Retrieved from June 10, 2022, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-18-6784_en.htm
  14. European Commission (2018b). Proposal for a Council Decision on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Japan, COM/2018/193 final - 2018/0092 (NLE), 1-8.
  15. European Commission (2018c). The Economic Impact of the EU–Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA). Retrieved June 10, 2022, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2018/july/tradoc_157116.pdf
  16. European Commission (2021). EU-Japan EPA Progress Report, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 1-34.
  17. European Parliament (2018). The EU - Japan Economic Partnership Agreement, Study, 1-58. Retrieved June 15, 2022, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2018/603880/EXPO_STU(2018)603880_EN.pdf
  18. Felbermayr, G., Kimura, F., Okubo, T., Steininger, M., & Yalcin, E. (2017). On the Economics of an EU-Japan Free Trade Agreement, Study of the Ifo Institute on behalf of the Bertelsmann Foundation, Final Report, 1-68.
  19. Francois, J., Manchin, M., & Norberg H. (2011). Economic Impact Assessment of an FTA between the EU and Japan. Retrieved June 20, 2022, from https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/july/tradoc_155782.pdf
  20. Frenkel, M., & Walter, B. (2017). The EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement: Relevance, Content and Policy Implications, Intereconomics, 52 (6), 358-363. DOI: 10.1007/s10272-017-0704-5
  21. Global Trade Datebase (2022). Retrieved September 13, 2022, from https://www.globaltradealert.org/
  22. Günther, H. H. (2017). The Japan-EU Economic Partnership Agreement: Economic Potentials and Policy Perspectives, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP) Comments, 49, Retrieved June 15, 2022 from https://www.swp-berlin.org/fleadmin/contents/products/comments/2017C49_hlp.pdf.
  23. Kawasaki, K. (2017). Emergent Uncertainty in Regional Integration - Economic impacts of alternative RTA scenarios, GRIPS Discussion Papers, 16-27.
  24. Lee-Makiyama, H. (2018). At the Nexus of Trade & Investment – The EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement, LSE Consulting, 1-21. Retrieved June 20, 2022, from https://www.lse.ac.uk/business/consulting/reports/at-the-nexus-of-trade-and-investment
  25. Mazur, G. (2018). Umowa o partnerstwie gospodarczym Unia Europejska-Japonia – nowy rozdział w dwustronnych stosunkach handlowych, Unia Europejska.pl, 2(249), 3-18.
  26. OECD (2017). Producer and Consumer Support Estimates database. Retrieved June 10, 2022, from https://www.oecd.org/eu/producerandconsumersupportestimatesdatabase.htm
  27. Pereira, P. S. (2018). The EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement from the European Parliament’s Perspective: A Landmark Agreement beyond Trade, Journal of Inter-Regional Studies, 2, 1-10.
  28. Przeździecka, E., Górska, R., Kuźnar, A., & Menkes, J. (2019).The Effects of EU–Japan Economic Partnership Agreement for Poland’s Economy, Ekonomista, 6, 701-733.
  29. Report of the 18th EU-Japan FTA/EPA Negotiating Round Tokyo, Week of 3 April 2017. Retrieved June 20, 2022, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/april/tradoc_155506.pdf
  30. Sunesen, E., Francois, J., & Thelle M. (2010). Assessment of Barriers to Trade and Investment between the EU and Japan, Final Report prepared for the European Union (DG Trade).
  31. UNCTAD (2017). TRAINS database, Sanitary and Phytosanitary measures. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://trainsonline.unctad.org/home
  32. WTO (2018). WTO document WT/TPR/OV/21, 27 November.
  33. WTO (2019a). Trade Policy Review, European Union, Report by the Secretariat, WT/TPR/S/395, 1-308.
  34. WTO (2019b). WTO documents WT/REG396/N/1 and S/C/N/921, 1.
  35. WTO (2019c). Committee on Regional Trade Agreements, Economic Partnership Agreement Between the European Union and Japan (Goods and Services), Report by the Secretariat, WT/REG396/1, 1-71.
  36. WTO (2020a). Tariff Profiles, Retrieved June 10, 2022, from https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/tariff_profiles_list_e.htm
  37. WTO (2020b), Trade Policy Review, Japan, Report by the Secretariat, WT/TPR/S/397, 1-209.
  38. WTO (2021). Tariff Profiles, Retrieved June 10, 2022, from https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/tariff_profiles_list_e.htm

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.