Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2018)
5th AIB-CEE 2018 Conference Proceedings | 9th ENTRE 2018 Conference Proceedings (Special Issue)

Articles

Specific trade concerns regarding the application of sanitary and phytosanitary measures by WTO countries - the European Union’s perspective

Published 2018-09-12

  • Agnieszka Hajdukiewicz

Agnieszka Hajdukiewicz
Cracow University of Economics

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to examine and discuss major trade concerns over the application of sanitary and phytosanitary measures (SPS) by WTO member countries, with the particular emphasis on the European Union’s SPS issues. While SPS measures are the key elements in the system of protection of life and health of people, animals and plants, numerous specific trade concerns (STCs)  formally raised to the WTO, show that these measures are often considered to be overly restrictive and inconsistent with the provisions of the SPS Agreement. The analysis, based on the data retrieved from the SPS Information Management System of the WTO, revealed that both developed and developing countries play a significant role notifying specific trade concerns, with developing country notifications increasing faster. The European Union is active both as a party raising the SPS issues and maintaining the measures questioned by trade partners. The conducted analysis of specific trade concerns, helps to identify measures related to the EU’s trade in agri-food products, which very likely constitute a tool of trade protectionism. Thus, the results have practical implications for governments and the EU’s decision making bodies that can undertake actions to remove unjustified barriers as well as for the companies that need to take into account the existing SPS requirements in their foreign markets entry strategies.

Keywords

specific trade concerns, sanitary and phytosanitary measures, WTO, European Union, international trade, agri-food products

PDF

References

  1. Ahteensuu M. (2007), Defending the precautionary principle against three criticisms, “Trames-Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences”, vol. 11, issue 4.
  2. Bora B., Kuwahara A., Laird S.(2002), Quantification of non-tariff measures, Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities, Study series no. 18, unctad/itcd/tab/19, United Nations, New York and Geneva.
  3. Crivelli, P., Groeschl J. (2012), The impact of sanitary and phytosanitary measures on market entry and trade flows, “World Economy”, vol. 393.
  4. Deardorff A. V., Stern, R. M. (1997), Measurement of Nontariff Barriers, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No 179 [online], https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/oececoaaa/179-en.htm, cited on 12 May 2018.
  5. Fontagné L., Orefice G., Piermartini R. et al. (2013), Product Standards and Margins of Trade: Firm Level Evidence, Staff Working Paper ERSD-2013-04, World Trade Organization Economic Research and Statistics Division, Geneva.
  6. Grant G., Arita S. (2017), Sanitary and Phyto-Sanitary Measures: Assessment, Measurement, and Impact, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium, Commissioned Paper No. 21, U.S.A.
  7. Hoeckman B., Nikita A. (2011), Trade Policy, Trade Costs, and Developing Country Trade, “World Development”, vol. 39, issue 12.
  8. Horn H., Mavroidis P.C.,Wijkström E.N. (2013), In the Shadow of the DSU: Addressing Specific Trade Concerns in the WTO SPS and TBT Committees, IFN Working Paper No. 960.
  9. Kee H.L., Nicita A.,Olarreaga M. (2009), Estimating Trade Restrictiveness Indices, “Economic Journal”, vol. 119, issue 534.
  10. Majone G. (2002), The precautionary principle and its policy implications, “Journal of Common Market Studies”, vol. 40, issue 1, pp. 89–109.
  11. Marchant G.E., Mossman K.L. (2004), Arbitrary and Capricious: The Precautionary Principle in the European Union courts, The AEI Press, Washington D.C.
  12. Sandin P. (1999), Dimensions of the precautionary principle, “Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal”, vol. 5, issue 5.
  13. Todt O., Luj´an JL. (2014), Analyzing precautionary regulation: Do precaution, science, and innovation go together?: Analyzing precautionary regulation, “Risk Analysis”, vol. 34, issue: 12.
  14. UNCTAD (2018), Classification of non-tariff measures, February 2012 version [online], http://unctad.org/en/Pages/DITC/Trade-Analysis/Non-Tariff-Measures/MAST-Group-on-NTMs.aspx, cited on: 22 May 2018.
  15. WTO (2017), Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. Specific Trade Concerns, Note by the Secretariat, G/SPS/GEN/204/Rev.17, WTO SPS Committeee, Geneva, Switzerland.
  16. WTO (2018a), The WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement) [online], https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/sps_e/spsagr_e.htm, cited on: 05 March 2018.
  17. WTO (2018b), Understanding the WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures [online], http s://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/sps_e/spsund_e.htm, cited on: 05 March 2018.
  18. WTO (2018c), SPS Information Management System [online], http://spsims.wto.org/, cited on: 12 June 2018.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.