Vol. 4 No. 3 (2018)
5th AIB-CEE 2018 Conference Proceedings | 9th ENTRE 2018 Conference Proceedings (Special Issue)

Articles

MOOC and the workplace: key support elements in dig-ital lifelong learning

Published 2018-09-12

  • Robert Farrow

Robert Farrow
University of Kent at Canterbury

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between trends in workplace learning and train-ing; the EU policy for lifelong learning; and describes the role that alternative forms of educational delivery such as MOOC can play in supporting future scenarios such as automation and digitalization. The research conducted is based on synthesis of prior research results, literature analysis, qualitative research, specifically course evaluation through roundtable discussion. This paper draws together research into MOOC delivery and impact and contextualises these in relation to both recent workplace trends (digitalisation and automation) and lifelong learning policies within the EU. A conceptual model for differentiating flexible, open and online forms of delivery is introduced.

Keywords

MOOC, lifelong learning, e-learning, digitalisation, heutagogy

PDF (Polish)

References

  1. Baynes, S. & Ross, J. (2014). The pedagogy of the Massive Open Online Course: the UK view. The Higher Education Academy (UK). https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/hea_edinburgh_mooc_web_240314_1.pdf
  2. BizMOOC (2018). MOOC BOOK. http://bizmooc.eu
  3. Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and Lifelong Learning: A Review of Heutagogical Practice and Self-Determined Learning. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 13(1). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1076/2087
  4. Brandi, U. & Iannone, R. L. (2015). Effective Lifelong Learning strategies and value creation at the enterprise level. LLLightinEurope Research Consortium. https://www.lllightineurope.com/fileadmin/lllightineurope/download/LLLight_Effective_Lifelong_Learning_Strategies_thematicreport_TR2_20150922.pdf
  5. Broadband Commission (2017). Working Group on the Digitalization Scorecard: Which policies and regulations can help advance digitalization? Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development. https://www.broadbandcommission.org/Documents/publications/WG-Digitalization-Score-Card-Report2017.pdf
  6. Brynjolfsson & McAfee (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  7. Calonge, D. S. and Shah, M. A. (2016) MOOCs, Graduate Skills Gaps and Employability: A Qualitative Systematic Review of the Literature. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 17(5). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2675
  8. Cedefop (2015). Skill shortages and gaps in European enterprises: striking a balance between vocational education and training and the labour market. Luxembourg: Publications Office. Cedefop reference series; No 102. http://dx.doi.org/10.2801/042499
  9. European Commission (n.d.). Lifelong Learning Programme. http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-programme_en
  10. European Commission (2018). Proposal for a council recommendation on Key Competencies for Lifelong Learning. https://ec.europa.eu/education/sites/education/files/swd-recommen dation-key-competences-lifelong-learning.pdf
  11. European Parliament and Council (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. OJ L 394 (30 December) 10–18.
  12. Gunderson, S., Jones, R. & Scanland, K. (2004). The Jobs Revolution: Changing How America Works. Copywriters Inc
  13. Hürsen, Ç. (2011). Öğretmenlerin Yaşam Boyu Öğrenme Yaklaşımına Yönelik Görüş, Tutum ve Yeterlik Algılarının. Değerlendirilmesi. DoktoraTezi, Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Lefkoşa.
  14. Hüther, M. (2016). Digitalisation: An engine for structural change - A challenge for economic policy. Cologne Institute for Economic Research (IW).
  15. Lambert L.A., Hassan H. (2018) MOOCs and International Capacity Building in a UN Framework: Potential and Challenges. In: Leal Filho W., Mifsud M., Pace P. (eds) Handbook of Lifelong Learning for Sustainable Development. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham
  16. Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Philips Nguyen, A., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, Not Technology, Drives Digital Transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review, (57181), 27. https://doi.org/http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/cn/Documents/technology- media-telecommunications/deloitte-cn-tmt-strategy-not-technology-drive-digital-transformation-en-150930.pdf
  17. Kaplan, A. (2016). Lifelong learning: conclusions from a literature review. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 5(2). http://www.ijge.info/ojs/index.php/IOJPE/article/view/598/628
  18. Knee, J. A. (2016). Why content is not always king. Financial Times (July 27). https://www.ft.com/content/d1b31182-51b7-11e6-9664-e0bdc13c3bef
  19. Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 15(1). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1651
  20. Norris, P. (2001). Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge University Press
  21. Orr, D., Weller, M., & Farrow, R. (2018). Models for online, open, flexible and technology-enhanced higher education across the globe – a comparative analysis. International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE). Oslo, Norway. Available from https://oofat.oerhub.net/OOFAT/. CC-BY-SA.
  22. Pappano, L. (2012) ‘The Year of the MOOC’. New York Times, Nov 2. http://www.nytimes.com /2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html
  23. Pitt, R., de los Arcos, B., Koppel, K., Miani, S. & Sancin, C. (2018). BizMOOC Result 4.2.a. Evaluation Report on Pilot MOOC 1. BizMOOC Project. http://bizmooc.eu
  24. Pouezevara, S.R. and Horn, L.J. (2016). MOOCs and Online Education: Exploring the Potential for International Educational Development. RTI Press Publication. No. OP-0029-1603. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.3768/
  25. Radford, A. W. Robles, J. Cataylo, S. Horn, L. Thornton, J. and Whitfield, K. (2014) The Employer Potential of MOOCs: A Mixed Methods Study of Human Resource Professionals’ Thinking on MOOCs. . The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 15(5). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1842
  26. Schick-Makaroff, K., MacDonald, M., Plummer, M., Burgess, J., & Neander, W. (2016). What Synthesis Methodology Should I Use? A Review and Analysis of Approaches to Research Synthesis. AIMS Public Health 3(1). 172-215. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690272/
  27. Shah, D. (2017). A Product at Every Price: A Review of MOOC Stats and Trends in 2017. Class Central. https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-stats-and-trends-2017/
  28. Steffens, K. (2015). Competences, Learning Theories and MOOCs: Recent Developments in Lifelong Learning. European Journal of Education Research, Development and Policy, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12102
  29. Stiglitz, J. E., & Greenwald, B. C. (2015). Creating a Learning Society - A New Approach to Growth,Development and Social Progress. Columbia University Press.
  30. Suri, H. & Clarke, D. (2009). Advancements in Research Synthesis Methods: From a Methodologically Inclusive Perspective. Review of Educational Research 79 (1). https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326349
  31. Yuan, L., Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. JISC CETIS. https://publications.cetis.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MOOCs-and-Open-Education.pdf

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 18

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.