Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2018)
5th AIB-CEE 2018 Conference Proceedings | 9th ENTRE 2018 Conference Proceedings (Special Issue)

Articles

Competitiveness profiles of manufacturing mesostructure

Published 2018-09-12

  • Jarosław Kaczmarek

Jarosław Kaczmarek
Cracow University of Economics

Abstract

The objective of this article is assessment of competitiveness and identification of manufacturing mesostructure characteristics in Poland in 1990–2017. The analysis is presented in the context of an assessment of transformation effects in the countries of Central Europe (CEB, SEE) with regard to structural changes and macroeconomic competitiveness. The author’s own research concerned 14,000 enterprises (full test, whole group of enterprises included in the public statistics in Poland) and concerned mesostructure development phases, changes of PKD divisions, the focal point way, objects classification and comparative analysis of submesostructure profiles. The research includes synthetic (multivariate) competitiveness measures. The measurement concerned the synthetic measure, its two partial measures (productiveness of labour and export productiveness of costs) and its factors (unit costs and efficiency of labour and intensity of export activity and general effectiveness). The value of the conducted research is its uniqueness – the analysis concerns all enterprises covered by public statistics and included in the manufacturing mesostructure of the Polish economy. This is the first research of this type in Poland. An important added value is the constructed model of factor analysis of the competitiveness and variability of the mesostructure and its profiling in terms of the size classes of enterprises. This is the first model to be used in the assessment of competitiveness at the mesoeconomic level of the countries undergoing transformation in Central Europe.

Keywords

competitiveness, productivity, mesostructure

PDF

References

  1. Aiginger, K. 1998. Unit Value to Signal the Quality Position of CEECs. In The Competitiveness of Transition Economies. OECD Proceedings: 93–121. Paris: OECD.
  2. Åslund, A. 2002. Building Capitalism: The Transformation of the Former Soviet Bloc. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Bałtowski, M. & Miszewski, M. 2006. Transformacja gospodarcza w Polsce. Warszawa: Wydawnic-two Naukowe PWN.
  4. Best, M.H. 2015. Greater Boston׳s industrial ecosystem: A manufactory of sectors. Technovation, 39–40: 4–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.04.004.
  5. Bieńkowski, W. 2007. Studia nad konkurencyjnością i ich rezultaty jako podstawa decyzji z zakresu polityki gospodarczej. In M. Weresa (Ed.), Polska. Raport o konkurencyjności 2007. Rola zagra-nicznych inwestycji bezpośrednich w kształtowaniu przewag konkurencyjnych: 315–325. War-szawa: SGH.
  6. Bossak, J. 2006. Teoria i metodologia. Krytyczna ocena stosowanych metod analizy. In M. Weresa (Ed.), Polska. Raport o konkurencyjności 2006. Rola innowacji w kształtowaniu przewag konku-rencyjnych: 235–245. Warszawa: SGH.
  7. Cyrson, E. 2002. Nowy paradygmat strategii konkurencji. In E. Skawińska (Ed.), Konkurencyjność przedsiębiorstw – nowe podejście: 25–35. Warszawa–Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  8. DeVet, J.M. 1993. Globalization, Local and Regional Competitiveness. Science. Technology and Industry Review, 13: 89–122.
  9. Dunford, M, Smith, A., Tsoukalis, L., Hall, R., Louri, H., & Rosenstock, M. 2001. Competition, Com-petitiveness and Enterprise Policies. In R. Hall, A. Smith, L. Tsoukalis (Eds.), Competitiveness and Cohesion in EU Policies: 109–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Dzikowska, M. & Gorynia, M. 2012. Teoretyczne aspekty konkurencyjności przedsiębiorstwa w kierunku koncepcji eklektycznej. Gospodarka Narodowa, 4: 4–13. http://gospodarkanarod owa.sgh.waw.pl/p/gospodarka_narodowa_2012_04_01.pdf. Accessed: 14.03.2018.
  11. Faulkner, D. & Bowman, C. 2000. Elements of competitive strategy. Bucharest: Teora.
  12. Feenstra, R.C. (Ed.) 1989. Trade Policies for International Competitiveness. Chicago – London: The University of Chicago Press. 1.
  13. Foss, N.J., & Mahnke, V. 1998. Strategy Research and the Market Process Perspective. DRUID Working Paper, 98–29: 1–30. http://www3.druid.dk/wp/19980029.pdf. Accessed: 14.03.2018.
  14. Frischtak, C. 1999. Manufacturing, Competitiveness: Concept, Measurement Policies. In F. Serco-vich, Ch–Y. Ahn, C. Frischtak, M. Mrak, H. Muegge, W. Peres (Eds.),Competition and the World Economy UNIDO: 85–95. Northampton: E. Elgar Publishing.
  15. Fukuyama, F. 2004. State–building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. London: Profile Books.
  16. Galli, G., & Pelkmans, J. (Eds.) 2000. Regulatory Reform and Competitiveness in Europe. Chelten-ham: E. Elgar Publishing.
  17. Grogan, L. & Moers, L. 2001. Growth Empirics with Institutional Measures for Transition Countries. Economic Systems, 25: 320–331. DOI: 10.1016/S0939–3625(01)00030–9.
  18. Gros, D. & Steinherr, A. 2004. Economic Transition in Central and Eastern Europe: Planting the Seed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Heybey, B. & Murrell, P. 1999. The Relationship between Economic Growth and the Speed of Liberalization during Transition. Journal of Policy Reform, 3: 121–137. DOI: 10.1080/13841289908523400.
  20. Hitt, M.A., Ricart, J.E., Costa, I., Nixon, R.D. 1998. Managing Strategically in an Interconnected World. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  21. Janasz, W. 2006. Mezoekonomia przemysłu w systemie nauk ekonomicznych. In W. Janasz (Ed.), Zarys strategii rozwoju przemysłu: 15–40. Warszawa: Difin.
  22. Kaczmarek, J. 2012. Mezostruktura gospodarki Polski w okresie transformacji. Uwarunkowania, procesy, efektywność. Warszawa: Difin.
  23. Kaczmarek, J. 2016. Intensywność i efekty transformacji gospodarczej, Przegląd Organizacji, 10: 62–71. file:///D:/Pobrane/Przeglad%20Organizacji%2010%202016%20art%2009%20Inten sywność%20i%20efekty%20transformacji%20gospodarczej.pdf. Accessed: 14.03.2018.
  24. Koźmiński, A. 2008. How it all happened. Essays in Political Economy of Transition. Warszawa: Difin.
  25. Krafft, J. 2000. The Process Competition. Cheltenham: E. Elgar Publishing.
  26. Krugman, P.R. 1994. Import Protection as Export Promotion: International Competition in the Pres-ence of Oligopoly and Economics of Scale. In: P.R. Krugman (Ed.), Rethinking International Trade: 185–198. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  27. Krugman, P.R., Obstfeld, M. & Melitz, M. 2014. International Economics. New York: Prentice Hall.
  28. Makadok, R. 1998. Can First–Mover and Early–Mover Advantages be Sustained in an Industry with Low Barriers to Entry/Imitation. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 683–696. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3094150. Accessed: 14.03.2018.
  29. Marsh, I.W. & Tokarick, S.P. 1994. Competitiveness Indicators. A Theoretical and Empirical As-sessment. International Monetary Fund, 29: 700–722. DOI: 10.1007/BF02707590.
  30. Naisbitt, J. 1984. Megatrends. The New Directions Transforming Our Lives. New York: Warner Books.
  31. Nazarczuk, J.M. 2008. Wybrane aspekty konkurencyjności polskiej gospodarki. In: A.P. Balcerzak, E. Rogalska (Ed.), Konkurencyjność gospodarki Polski: 25–35. Toruń: Wydawnictwo A. Marszałek.
  32. Obłój, K. 1998. Strategia organizacji. W poszukiwaniu trwałej przewagi konkurencyjnej. Warszawa: PWE.
  33. Olczyk, M., Daszkiewicz, N. 2008. Konkurencyjność podmiotów – ujęcie teoretyczne. In N. Daszkie-wicz (Ed.), Konkurencyjność. Poziom makro, mezo i mikro: 9–20. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  34. Porter, M.E. 2008. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  35. Radulescu, R. & Barlow, D. 2005. The Sequencing of Reform in Transition Economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 33: 829–841. DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2005.07.002
  36. Reynauld, A., Vidal, J.P. 1998. Labour Standards and International Competitiveness: A Comparative Analysis of Developing and Industrialized Countries. Cheltenham: E. Elgar Publishing.
  37. Roland, G. 2000. Transition and Economics: Politics, Markets and Firms. London: The IMT Press.
  38. Staehr, K. 2003. Reforms and Economic Growth in Transition Economies: Complementarity, Se-quencing, and Speed. BOFiT Discussion Papers, 1: 22–32. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1015454.
  39. Stankiewicz, M.J. 2000. Istota i sposoby oceny konkurencyjności przedsiębiorstwa. Gospodarka Narodowa, 7–8: 95–111.
  40. Wziątek–Kubiak, A.(2003. Konkurencyjność polskiego przemysłu. Warszawa: Bellona.
  41. Yang, X. 1995. Globalization of the Automoble Industry. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
  42. Zinnes, C., Eilat, Y. & Sachs, J. 2001. Benchmarking Competitiveness in Transition Economies. Economics of Transition, 9: 315–353. DOI: 10.1111/1468–0351.00078.
  43. Zinnes, C., Eilat, Y., & Sachs, J. 2001. Benchmarking Competitiveness in Transition Economies. Economics of Transition, 9: 315–353. DOI: 10.1111/1468–0351.00078.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.