Is the euro area a prelude to the fiscal union? Introduction to the ‘fiscal confluence criteria’

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the article is to investigate the suitability of the European Union (EU) convergence criteria as an evaluative instrument in assessing its progression from the monetary union (MU) to the fiscal union (FU). The secondary aim was to propose a list of ‘fiscal confluence criteria’ as a foundation for evaluating member states’ ability to adhere to the fiscal union.

Research Design & Methods: A quantitative research methodology was employed, using eight indicators and three distinct methods (Euclidean distance, standardized sums, Technique for Order Preference and Similarity to Ideal Solution) to create a joint development measure, known as the core measure, for each group: CMMU and CMFU. I employed Spearman’s ρ to calculate the rank correlation between Monetary and fiscal union. The research sample comprised all 27 European Union member states (EU MS). I sourced the datasets from reputable databases, namely Eurostat, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank (WB), and Accounting for Transparency (AFT).

Findings: The integrity level of the EU member states falls notably below the established thresholds. There are significant discrepancies between the countries. Consequently, the possibility of the EU attaining the next level of integration (FU) in the foreseeable future is limited.

Implications & Recommendations: Given the obvious limitations on the ability of EU member states to pursue further integration in the immediate future, policymakers, and business entities within the EU should prioritize maintaining the agreement in its current form (Economic and monetary union). Further research should immediately concentrate on the causes and remedies of rising Euroscepticism in EU MS.

Contribution & Value Added: This research offers valuable insights into the potential for further integration within the EU. Moreover, it initiates a discourse on the formulation of new criteria for the next level of integration (fiscal union).

Keywords

European Union, monetary union, fiscal union, convergence criteria, fiscal confluence criteria

Author Biography

Wojciech Ficek

Financial Analyst, Bachelor of International Economics (2022), Master of International Economics (2024) from Krakow University of Economics (Krakow, Poland). His research interests include regional integration, European unification process, financial economics, monetary integration, international trade relations. Applied research methods: panel data regression, synthetic measures of development, Ward’s method, standardized sum method, correlation analysis, TOPSIS.

References

1. Accounting for Transparency. (2023). TCI Data. Retrieved from https://www.taxcomplexity.org/ on August 12, 2023.
2. Afonso, A., Alves, J., & Coelho, J.C. (2023). Determinants of the Degree of Fiscal Sustainability. CESifo Working Paper No. 10225. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4338242
3. Bąk, A. (2018). Comparative analysis of selected linear ordering methods based on empirical and simulation data. Research Papers of Wroclaw University of Economics, 21(508), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2018.508.02
4. Bąk, I., & Szczecińska, B. (2022). Health Protection as an Important Element of Sustainable Development: Example of European Union Countries. European Research Studies Journal, 25(3), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/3002
5. Beck, K., & Okhrimenko, I. (2024). Optimum Currency Area in the Eurozone. The regional origins of the European Business Cycle. Open Economies Review, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-024-09750-z
6. Berger, H., Dell’Ariccia, G., & Obstfeld, M. (2019). Revisiting the economic case for fiscal union in the Euro area. IMF Economic Review, 67(1), 657-683. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-019-00089-x
7. Bilbiie, F., Monacelli, T., & Perotti, R. (2021). Fiscal policy in Europe: controversies over rules, mutual insurance, and centralization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(2), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.2.77
8. Blanchard, O., Leandro, A., & Zettelmeyer, J. (2021). Redesigning EU fiscal rules: from rules to standards. Economic Policy, 36(106), 195-236. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiab003
9. Butler, G. (2020). The European Defence Union and Denmark’s defence opt-out: A legal appraisal. European Foreign Affairs Review, 25(1), 117-150. https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2020008
10. Butorina, O.V., & Borko, Y.A. (2022). Benefits of Regional Integration: Redefining the Concept. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 92(2), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331622080020
11. Califano, A., & Gasperin, S. (2019). Multi-speed Europe is already there: Catching up and falling behind. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 51(14), 152-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.08.009
12. Cervelló-Royo, R., Devece, C., & Blanco-González Tejero, C. (2023). Economic freedom influences economic growth and unemployment: an analysis of the Eurozone. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2023.2175007
13. Cremona, M. (2019). The Treaties that Created Europe. In G. Amato, E. Moavero-Milanesi, G. Pasquino & L. Reichlin (Eds.), The History of the European Union: Constructing Utopia (pp. 133-150). Oxford: Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12964
14. Costa, L., Guedes de Oliveira, F., Leitão, A., & Paredes, J. (2021). Business cycles and trends in Germany and Portugal: macroeconomic policy implications in the Euro Area. European Planning Studies, 29(4), 654-680. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1766424
15. Dermine, P., & Larch, M. (2023). Solving the Enforcement Dilemma of the EU Fiscal Rules. CESifo Forum, 24(4), 26-29. Retrieved from https://www.cesifo.org/node/76762 on May 2, 2023.
16. Dyson, B. (2017). Integration of Life Cycle Assessment Into Decision-Analytic Approaches for Sustainable Technologies. In M. A. Abraham (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Sustainable Technologies (pp. 81-89). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10037-5
17. European Central Bank. (2022). Convergence Report. https://doi.org/10.2866/230064
18. European Council. (2018). Proposal on the architecture of a Eurozone Budget within the framework of the European Union. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/37011/proposal-on-the-architecture-of-a-eurozone-budget.pdf on August 1, 2023.
19. Eurostat. (2023). HICP, DF, DB, LTNR, and (r-g) Data. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat on August 10, 2023.
20. Ficek, W., & Gawlik, R. (2022). A comparative analysis of regional integration potential in the Asia-Pacific Region. International Entrepreneurship Review, 8(4), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2022.0804.02
21. Fuest, C., & Peichl, A. (2012). European Fiscal Union: What is it? does it Work? and are there really 'no Alternatives’?. CESifo Forum, 13(1), 3-9. Retrieved from https://www.cesifo.org/node/27318 on August 10, 2023.
22. Głodowska, A. (2017). Business Environment and Economic Growth in the European Union Countries: What Can be Explained for the Convergence?. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(4), 189-204. http://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050409
23. Hoppe, T., Schanz, D., Sturm, S., & Sureth-Sloane, C. (2023). The tax complexity index – a survey-based country measure of tax code and framework complexity. European Accounting Review, 32(2), 239-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2021.1951316
24. Howarth, D., & Schild, J. (2021). Nein to ‘Transfer Union’: the German brake on the construction of a European Union fiscal capacity. Journal of European Integration, 43(2), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.1877690
25. International Monetary Fund. (2023). FDEV Data. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Data on August 10, 2023.
26. Ioannou, D., & Stracca, L. (2014). Have the euro area and EU governance worked? Just the facts. European Journal of Political Economy, 34(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2013.11.009
27. Kacprzak, D. (2018). The Interval TOPSIS Method For Group Decision Making. Optimum. Economic Studies, 94(4), 256-273. https://doi.org/10.15290/oes.2018.04.94.19
28. Kovacova, M., Kliestik, T., Valaskova, K., Durana, P., & Juhaszova, Z. (2019). Systematic review of variables applied in bankruptcy prediction models of Visegrad group countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(4), 743-772. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2019.034
29. Kundera, J. (2019). The future of EU: towards a two speed Europe. European Research Studies Journal, 22(3), 261-281. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1469
30. Maciejewski, M. (2017). The problems of the economic development of the European Union Member States. Scientific Journal of the University of Economics in Katowice, 319(10), 117-126. Retrieved from https://bazekon.uek.krakow.pl/en/rekord/171478927 on August 10, 2023.
31. Maciejewski, M., & Głodowska, A. (2020). Economic development versus growing importance of the financial sector: Global insight. International Entrepreneurship Review, 6(3), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2020.0603.06
32. Michalewska Pawlak, M. (2021). Globalisation as the Determinant of Regional Development Management in the European Union. Horyzonty Polityki, 12(39), 25 39. https://doi.org/10.35765/HP.2019
33. Microsoft Corporation. (2023). Microsoft Excel (version 2307, build 16626.20134). Retrieved from https://office.microsoft.com/excel on August 10, 2023.
34. Mileusnic, M. (2023). EU fiscal policy shifts: towards more integration?. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 2960-2979. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2106277
35. Pera, J. (2016). Evaluation of the macroeconomic stability of central and eastern European countries with a view toward their membership in the European union. Multidimensional Risk Analysis. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 19(3), 69-92. https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2016-0021
36. Python Software Foundation. (2023). Python Language Reference (version 3.11.4). Retrieved from https://www.python.org on August 14, 2023.
37. Šarić, M. (2023). Croatia’s Energy Position in the European Union with Special Reference to the Croatian-Hungarian Relation. Scholars Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 10(4), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjebm.2023.v10i04.004
38. Sahay, R., Čihák, M., N’Diaye, P., Barajas, A., Bi, R., Ayala, D., Gao, Y., Kyobe, A., Nguyen, L., Saborowski, C., Svirydzenka, K., & Yousefi, S.R. (2015). Rethinking financial deepening: Stability and growth in emerging markets. IMF Staff Discussion Note, 15(8), 1-41. https:/doi.org/10.5089/9781498312615.006
39. Scharpf, F.W. (2014). Political Legitimacy in a Non-Optimal Currency Area. In O. Cramme & S.B. Hobolt (Eds.), Democratic Politics in a European Union Under Stress (pp. 19-47). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198724483.003.0002
40. Stanek, P. (2019). Public Debt Sustainability in a Monetary Union. Cracow University of Economics. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/Public-Debt-Sustainability on February 2, 2024.
41. Statistics Poland. (2024). Stimulant, destimulant, and nominant definitions. Retrieved from https://stat.gov.pl/en/metainformation/glossary/terms-used-in-official-statistics/list.html on February 2, 2024.
42. Svirydzenka, K. (2016). Introducing a New Broad-based Index of Financial Development. International Monetary Fund, 16(5), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513583709.001
43. Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., Phi, N.T.M., Hong, H.H.T., & Chu, V.T. (2019). Does financial integration matter for financial development? Evidence from the East Asian and Pacific Region. Journal of Economic Integration, 34(4), 591-618. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2019.34.4.591
44. Taşcu-Stavre, M., & Staicu, M.S. (2021). The European Dream – The International Authority for Ruhr and the emergence of the European Coal and Steel Community. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Political Sciences and European Studies, 7(1), 72-79. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenpses/7.1/31
45. Thakkar, J.J. (2021). Multi-criteria decision making. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4745-8
46. Turczak, A., & Zwiech, P. (2013). How to use taxonomic measures to divide the budget of incentive bonuses in a company. Scientific Journal of the University of Szczecin, 31(2), 253-268. Retrieved from https://bazekon.uek.krakow.pl/rekord/171361951 on February 2, 2024.
47. Uramová, M., Šuplata, M., & Lacová, Ž. (2021). The financial and monetary integration in the European Union at the beginning of the third decade of 21st century: the past and post-Lisbon focus. In G. Pellat & X. Richet (Eds.), L'Europe, ses acteurs et leurs stratégies: visions managériales croisées (pp. 1-21). L’Harmattan. Retrieved from https://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index.asp?navig=catalogue&obj=article&no=35931 on February 2, 2024.
48. Wasserfallen, F. (2022). The Politics of Fiscal Integration in Eurozone Reforms and Next Generation EU. In D. Adamski, F. Amtenbrink & J. de Haan (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook on European Monetary, Economic, and Financial Market Integration (pp. 1-19). Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/Politics-of-Fiscal-Integration on February 2, 2024.
49. World Bank. (2023). TO Data. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/ on August 10, 2023.
50. Zabawa, J., & Kozyra, C. (2020). Eco-Banking in Relation to Financial Performance of the Sector – The Evidence from Poland. Sustainability, 12(6), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062162