Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Responsibility in the activities of transnational companies


The activities of transnational corporations bring many benefits, but also threats in the host countries and the world. The phenomenon of CSR, SRI and FT has been growing rapidly in recent years. The objectives of the article are: a description of the participation of transnational corporations in raising the level of stratification of society in the rich North and the poor South as well as an analysis of processes related to liability and justice – Corporate Social responsibility (CSR) and Socially responsible investing (SRI), including the concept of Fair Trade (FT) 3.0. Descriptive method was applied in respect to the first goal, in the case of second objective, the phenomena of CSR, responsible investing and Fair Trade 3.0. were examined and described. This study confirms prior voices that it is necessary to develop a new economy – the economy of social development – oriented to increase the standards of living and prosperity, and to stimulate economic growth and social development influencing positively the reduction of social inequalities. The originality of this work lays in proposal a new concept of Fair Trade 3.0 and indicates its theoretical assumptions. This is new concept of foreign trade is based on responsibility “towards others” and “for others”.


transnational companies, CSR, Fair Trade, responsible investment



  1. ATKearney (2015). Global Cities 2015: The Race Accelerates. Retrieved from: Race+Accelerates.pdf/7b239156-86ac-4bc6-8f30-048925997ac4 (30.12.2015).
  2. Berry, T.C., & Junkus, J.C. (2012). Socially Responsible Investing: An Investor Perspec-tive. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 707-720.
  3. Bieler, A. (2013). Global Corporations, Trade and Investment: Free Trade to Fair Trade? Paper presented at the first meeting of the Futures Commission on Alternatives to Neoliberalism; Johannesburg/South Africa, 24 and 25 June 2013. Retrieved from: trade%20paper.pdf (30.12.2015).
  4. Bowen, A. (2013). Do transnational corporations have a place in fair trade? Retrieved from: (30.12.2015).
  5. Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility and institutional theory: new perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Re-view, 10, 3-28.
  6. Capelle-Blancard, G. & Monjon, S. (2012). Trends in the literature on socially responsible investment: looking for the keys under the lamppost. Business Ethics: A European Review, 21(3), 1-20.
  7. CDP (2015). Catalyzing business and government action. Retrieved from: (30.12.2015).
  8. Child, C. (2015). Mainstreaming and its Discontents: Fair Trade, socially Responsible Investing, and Industry Trajectories. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(3), 601-618.
  9. Dragusanu, R., Giovannucci, D., & Nunn, N. (2014). The Economics of Fair Trade. Jour-nal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 217-236.
  10. Dziawgo, D., & Dziawgo, L. (2015). Wybrane aspekty CSR na rynku finansowym. Wy-niki badań na reprezentatywnej próbie polskiego społeczeństwa. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 395, 84-93.
  11. European Union (2015). Tax Reforms in EU Member States 2015 Tax policy challenges for economic growth and fiscal sustainability. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2765/274179.
  12. Eurosif (2014). European SRI Study 2014. Brussels: Eurosif A.I.S.B.L. Retrieved from: (30.12.2015).
  13. Fairtrade (2015). Who we are. Bonn: Fairtrade International. Retrieved from: (30.12.2015).
  14. Forno, F., & Graziano, P.R. (2014). Sustainable community movement organisations. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14, 139-157.
  15. Fortune (2016). Global 500. Retrieved from: (30.12.2015).
  16. Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1), 51-71.
  17. Jastrzębska, E. (2012). Korporacje transnarodowe a Fair Trade. Kwartalnik Kolegium Ekonomiczno-Społecznego. Studia i Prace, SGH, Warszawa, 4(8), 29-49.
  18. Juščius, V., & Snieška V. (2008). Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Com-petitive Abilities of Corporations. The economic conditions of enterprise function-ing, Engineering Economics, 3 (58), 34-44.
  19. KPMG (2015). European Responsible Investing Fund Survey 2015. Luxembourg: KPMG Luxembourg. Retrieved from: (30.12.2015).
  20. Mbaruku, M., & Mutalemwa, D. (2015). Success Stories of Tanzanian Women Entrepre-neurship Programs in Alleviating Poverty: Insights from WORTH Program. Entre-preneurial Business and Economics Review, 3(1), 87-105.
  21. Lund-Thomsen, P., & Lindgreen, A. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Value Chains: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going? Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 1-12.
  22. McKinsey & Company (2011). Urban world: Mapping the economic power of cities. Retrieved from: (30.12.2015).
  23. Moore, G. (2004). The Fair Trade movement: parameters, issues and future research. Journal of business ethics, 53(1-2), 73-86.
  24. Oshri I., Kotlarsky J., & Willcocks L.P. (2009). The Handbook of Global Outsourcing and Offshoring. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  25. Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competi-tive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, De-cember 2006, 78-92.
  26. Rodriguez, P., Siegel, D.S., Hillman, A., & Eden, L. (2006). Three lenses on the multina-tional enterprise: politics, corruption, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 733-746.
  27. Rogowski, W., & Ulianiuk, A. (2012). Społecznie odpowiedzialne inwestowanie (SRI) – próba charakterystyki. Część III: Efektywność inwestycji społecznie odpowiedzial-nych, Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów. Zeszyt Naukowy 114, SGH, Warszawa, 64–81.
  28. The Climate Group (2015). The Climate Group works with leaders to create a net zero emissions world. Retrieved from: (30.12.2015).
  29. Ulman, P., & Šoltés, E. (2015). The Monetary and Non-Monetary Aspects of Poverty in Poland and Slovakia. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 3(1), 61-73.
  30. UNCTAD (2015). Gross domestic product: Total and per capita, current and constant (2005) prices, annual, 1970-2014. Retrieved from: (30.12.2015).
  31. USAID (2015). Private Sector Partners. Retrieved from: (30.12.2015).
  32. USSIF (2015). Report on US Sustainable, Responsible and Impact Investing Trends 2014. Retrieved from: (30.12.2015).
  33. Wach, K. (2014). Internationalisation and Globalisation as the Wider Context of Europe-anisation Processes from the Macro- and Microeconomic Perspective. Horyzonty Polityki, 5(10).
  34. WFTO (2015). 10 Principles of Fair Trade. WR Culemborg (The Netherlands): World Fair Trade Organization. Retrieved from: (30.12.2015).
  35. WFTO (2016). Annual reports. Retrieved from: (30.01.2016).
  36. WVU Fair Trade (2015). About. Retrieved from: (30.01.2016).
  37. Zasępa, P. (2013). Analiza efektywności inwestycji w akcje spółek społecznie odpowie-dzialnych na przykładzie indeksu RESPECT. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 311, 212-220.
  38. Zysk, W. (2015). Global and European Trends in the Area of Responsibility and Justice in the Activities of Enterprises: Implications for V4 Countries (chapter 11). In: A.S. Gubik & K. Wach (Eds.), Institutional Aspects of Entrepreneurship (pp. 165-176). Miskolc: University of Miskolc.


Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.