Vol. 4 No. 3 (2018)
5th AIB-CEE 2018 Conference Proceedings | 9th ENTRE 2018 Conference Proceedings (Special Issue)

Articles

The role of university in influencing the entrepreneurial intention of university students

Published 2018-09-12

  • Andrea S. Gubik
    • ,
  • Zoltan Bartha

Andrea S. Gubik
University of Miskolc

Zoltan Bartha
University of Miskolc

Abstract

In this paper we identify the factors of university student entrepreneur’s entrepreneurial motivations, and we check the nature of the relationship of these factors with university level entrepreneurship education characteristics. The 2016 data of the Global University Entrepreneurial Spirit Students’ Survey was used for the tests in the four Visegrad countries: the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia. We define five factors of entrepreneurial motivation: Customer focus, Social mission, Collective/community goals, Individual goals and Competition/market focus. Entrepreneurship education characteristics are weakly correlated with some of these factors. The strongest relationship can be detected in case of Competition/market focus. Our findings suggest that university level entrepreneurship education in the Visegrad region might influence the analytical skills of young entrepreneurs, but the social and community mission of the student entrepreneurs are less developed. We conclude that entrepreneurship education should focus more on the development of these intrinsic motivations.

Keywords

entrepreneurial motivation, entrepreneurship education, GUESSS, student entrepreneurship, Visegrad countries

PDF

References

  1. Acs, Z., Szerb, L., Autio, E., & Lloyd, A. 2016. Global Entrepreneurship Index 2017, GEDI – Global Entrepreneurship Network, https://thegedi.org/2017-global-entrepreneurship-index/
  2. Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Pro-cesses, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90029-s
  3. Alberti, F. 1999. Entrepreneurship education: scope and theory. C. Salvato, P. Davidsson and A. Persson (eds.): Entrepreneurial knowledge and learning: conceptual advances and directions for future research. Jonkoping, Jonkoping International Business School. Research Report.
  4. Antonioli, D., Nicolli, F., Ramaciotti, L., & Rizzo, U. 2013. The Effect of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Moti-vations on Academics’ Entrepreneurial Intention. Administrative Science, 6(4), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci6040015
  5. Bechard, J-P., & Gregoire, D. 2005. Entrepreneurship Education Research Revisited: The Case of Higher Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 22-43. https://doi.org/10.2307/40214261
  6. Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. 2003. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. Review of Economic Studies, 70(3), 489–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937x.00253
  7. Bilic, I., Prka, A., & Vidovic, G. 2011. How does education influence entrepreneurship orientation? - case study of Croatia. Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 16 (1), 115-128.
  8. Deci E.L. 1975. Inequity and Intrinsic Motivation. In: Intrinsic Motivation. Springer, Boston, MA https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4446-9_7
  9. Douglas, E. J. 2013. Reconstructing entrepreneurial intentions to identify predisposition for growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(5), 633-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.07.005
  10. Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. 2014. The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial atti-tudes and intention: Hysteresis and persistence. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12065
  11. Fayolle, A., & Lassas-Clerc, N. 2006. Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education pro-grammes: a new methodology. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30, 701–720.
  12. Gilbert, D. H. 2012. From chalk and talk to walking the walk. Education + Training, 54(2/3), 152-166. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911211210260
  13. Jones, P., Jones, A., Packham, G., & Miller, C. 2008. Student attitudes towards enterprise education in Poland: a positive impact. Education + Training, 50(7), 597-614. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910810909054
  14. Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. 2000. Competing models of entrepreneurial inten-tions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 411-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(98)00033-0
  15. Nuttin J. 1984. Motivation, planning, and action. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press and Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  16. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E.L. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motiva-tion, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68
  17. Sanchez, J. C. 2011. University training for entrepreneurial competencies: Its impact on intention of venture creation. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2, 239.
  18. Shapero, A. 1982. Social Dimensions of Entrepreneurship. In Kent, C., Sexton, D., Vesper, K., (Eds.): The Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship,; Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, 72–90.
  19. Sieger, P., Gruber, M., Fauchart, E., & Zellweger, T. 2016. Measuring the social identity of entre-preneurs: Scale development and international validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(5), 542-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.07.001
  20. van Stel, A., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. 2005. The Effect of Entrepreneurial Activity on National Eco-nomic Growth. Small Business Economics, 24(3), pp. 311-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-1996-6
  21. Weber, R., von Graevenitz, G., & Harhoff, D. 2009. The Effects of Entrepreneurship Education. Discussion paper 2009 - 11, Munich School of Management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

51-60 of 169

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.