Factors affecting the choice of Incoterms: The case of companies operating in Poland

Abstract

Objective: The main objective of this paper is to identify and examine the main factors which affect the choice of Incoterms® rules that are used in international sales contracts by enterprises operating in Poland.

Research Design & Methods: Mixed methods research was conducted to achieve this goal. The methods applied include the critical review of existing literature on Incoterms® and their use in international sales contracts and a survey carried out among export/import managers of companies operating in Poland.

Findings: Results of this study proved that there are many external and internal factors to consider in the Incoterms® selection process, which can affect cost, risks, liabilities and formalities of international transactions. The main problem faced by many companies is making incorrect or decisions on Incoterms®, as traders often underestimate their potential, misuse or apply certain terms too much, choosing them without much reflection and continuing to use the same Incoterms® even if other conditions of transactions differ significantly. The fact that most of companies don’t consider domestic and foreign competition as a factor strongly affecting their decisions on Incoterms® may suggest that the use of Incoterms® as a strategic tool for building competitive advantage is often underestimated. Also, many traders seem to be mainly focused on cost of transportation but do not see the link between Incoterms® and terms of payment or other financial aspects of transaction. The results revealed also that the selection of Incoterms® is often considered as a difficult task because of the insufficient knowledge on the topic and that entrepreneurs point out the need for further training that would increase their knowledge and skills in the proper use of Incoterms®.

Implications & Recommendations: The obtained results can be used both by entrepreneurs making decisions about Incoterms®, who need guidance on their correct application. They also give indications for the education sector on how to better respond to the need for expanding knowledge and skills about Incoterms®, especially with respect to Incoterms® selection and its determinants, by shaping its educational offer appropriately.

Contribution & Value Added: The research provides deeper understanding and fills the gap in knowledge regarding Incoterms® and their appropriate use in international trade. It considers different factors affecting decisions on selection of Incoterms® made by companies operating in Poland.

Keywords

Incoterms, delivery terms, trade terms, sales and purchase contract, trade facilitation

Author Biography

Agnieszka Hajdukiewicz

Assistant professor, PhD in economics. Works at the Department of International Trade, Cracow University of Economics (Poland). Her research interests focus on trade protectionism, barriers to international trade, international trade and policies in the agricultural sector, international marketing and economic diplomacy.

Bożena Pera

Assistant professor, PhD in economics, Works at the Department of International Trade, Cracow University of Economics (Poland). Her research interests focus on international trade, international economic integration, regional trade agreements, international trade policy and international business.

References

1. Bergami, R. (2013). Managing Incoterms 2010 risks: tension with trade and banking practices. International Journal of Economics and Business Research,6(3), 324-338.
2. Chevalier, D. (2000).Incoterms 2000 : Tous les mécanismes. Paris: MOCI. Hors série.
3. Davis, J.,& Vogt, J. (2021). Incoterms® 2020 and missed opportunities for the next version. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications.DOI: 10.1080/13675567.2021.1897974
4. Debattista, C. (2020). Incoterms® 2020. Introduction. Paris: International Chamber Of Commerce. Retrieved on October 25, 2021 from https://iccwbo.org/publication/incoterms-2020-introduction.
5. Deloitte (2020). Incoterms® 2020 – The hidden champions of efficiency. Your guide to improving business performance across the entire value and supply chain. Retrieved August 2, 2021 from https://www2.deloitte.com/de/de/pages/consumer-business/articles/incoterms-2020-white-paper.html;.
6. Duncan, R. (1972). Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly17(3), 313-327.
7. Gardner, D.L. (2012). How to Use International Trade Terms for Competitive Advantage & Financial Gain. Los Angeles: Trade Facilitators, Inc.
8. Hien, N., Laporte, G., & Roy, J. (2009). Business Environment Factors, Incoterms Selection and Export Performance. Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal,2(2), 63-78.
9. Huuhka, H. (2019). Effective Use of Incoterms in the Case Company. Pori: Satakunta University of Applied Sciences. Degree Programme in International Trade. Retrieved August 5, 2021 fromhttps://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/160438/Henni_Huuhka.pdf.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
10. ICC (2019). Incoterms® 2020. ICC Rules for the Use of Domestic and International Trade Terms. ICC Publication: 723E. Paris: ICC Services Publications Department.
11. ICC (2021). Incoterms® Rules. Retrieved October 20, 2021 fromhttps://iccwbo.org/resources-for-business/incoterms-rules.
12. ITA (2021). Know your Incoterms®. Washington: International Trade Administration. U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved August 23, 2021 from https://www.trade.gov/know-your-incoterms
13. Malfliet, J. (2011). Incoterms 2010 and the mode of transport: how to choose the right term. Management challenges in the 21st century : transport and logistics : opportunity for Slovakia in the era of knowledge economy, Proceedings (pp. 163-179). Presented at the Management Challenges in the 21st Century: Transport and Logistics: Opportunity for Slovakia in the Era of Knowledge Economy Bratislava, Slovakia: City University of Seattle Bratislava.
14. Orbis (2021). Orbis database. Retrieved September, 2021 from https://www.bvdinfo.com/en-gb/our-products/data/international/orbis
15. Piltz, B. (2020). Incoterms® 2020. Revija Kopaoničke Škole Prirodnog Prava 1/2020, 9-28. DOI: 10.5937/RKSPP2001009P
16. Schaefer, T. J. (2017). Incoterms® use in buyer-seller relationships: A mixed methods study. St Louis: University of Missouri. Dissertation 692. Retrieved August 23, 2021 from https://irl.umsl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1666&context=dissertation
17. ShipHub (2020). Reguły transport międzynarodowego. Incoterms 2020.Retrieved August 23, 2021 from https://www.shiphub.pl/incoterms
18. Stojanović, D.,&Ivetić, J. (2020). Possibilities of using Incoterms clauses in a country logistics performance assessment and benchmarking. Transport Policy, 98, 217-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.03.012
19. Suraraksa, J., Amchang, C., & Sawatwong, N. (2020). Decision-Making on Incoterms® 2020 of Automotive Parts Manufacturers in Thailand. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 461-470. DOI: 10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO10.461
20. Unal, T.D., & Metin, I. (2021). Do the factors affecting Incoterms® selection differ for exporters and importers? A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) application. LogForum17(2), 299-309. DOI: 10.17270/J.LOG.2021.585
21. Wood, G., & Aversa, F. (2019). Procurement contracts and Incoterms; How to ensure your supply contracts are not incompatible with Incoterms®. Retrieved August 23, 2021 from https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4d25c17b-fc34-4b7a-8154-21a6aa78aafb
22. Yaakub, S., Szu, L. Y., Arbak, S., & Halim, N. A. (2018). Incoterms® selection factors and its effect on export performance. Journal of Advance Research in Business, Marketing, and Supply Chain Management, 2(1), 9-18.