Eco-innovation performance in the European Union economies: Perspective on outcomes

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this article was to examine the eco-innovation performance of the European Un-ion’s economies in terms of eco-innovation outcomes with a particular focus on resource efficiency and socio-economic outcomes.

Research Design & Methods: We used quantitative research methods, such as descriptive statistics, Euclidean distance, and Pearson’s correlation index. We based the comparative analysis of the eco-innovation indices related to outputs and outcomes on the Eco-innovation Scoreboard. We conducted it for the years 2013-2022.

Findings: The research results showed that EU countries considered as one group improved their eco-innovation performance as measured by the Eco-innovation Index (EII), as well as in terms of the EII composite indices related to innovation outcomes during the study period. We also observed improvement in the EII and the EII thematic areas observed for both the eco-innovation leaders and catching-up economies. However, the leading countries maintained and even slightly increased the distance to the EU-27 average in terms of the total EII index, while significantly increasing the distance in terms of socio-economic outcomes and eco-innovation outputs. Moreover, the rates of growth of eco-innovation outputs and outcomes were much higher for these countries than the growth rate of their eco-innovation inputs.

Implications & Recommendations: The study highlights the importance of the effective conversion of the eco-innovation inputs into eco-innovation outputs and outcomes, which is a big challenge, especially for the economies with poorer eco-innovation performance. The increase in eco-innovation inputs alone does not translate directly into an increase in eco-innovation outcomes in all conditions. Creating appropriate conditions for the development of eco-innovation requires a coordinated political approach, especially between innovation, research and environmental policy.

Contribution & Value Added: The study contributes to a better understanding of eco-innovation for better policymaking. In particular, it can give a comprehensive picture of eco-innovation outcomes in the European Union as one of the key components of eco-innovation performance. The article also addresses the vital issue of the relationship between eco-innovation inputs and eco-innovation outputs and outcomes.

Keywords

eco-innovation, eco-innovation index, eco-innovation outputs, resource efficiency outcomes, socio-economic outcomes, the European Union, leading economies

Author Biography

Agnieszka Hajdukiewicz

Associate Professor at the College of Economics, Finance and Law, Krakow University of Economics, Department of International Trade. She received a PhD in economics at the Faculty of Economics, Krakow University of Economics and completed her habilitation (dr hab.) in economics and finance at the same university. Her main research interests are international trade, trade policy, trade conflicts, foreign market analysis and international marketing. She is a member of the Academy of International Business (AIB) and is engaged in several scientific projects.

Bożena Pera

Assistant Professor at the College of Economics, Finance and Law, Krakow University of Economics, Department of International Trade. She received a PhD in economics from the Faculty of Economics, Krakow University of Economics. Her research interests focus on international trade, economic integration, the disintegration process, regional trade agreements, international trade policy, and international business. She has been actively engaged in several research projects.

References

1. Al-Ajlani, H., Cvijanović, V., Es-Sadkix, N., & Müller, V. (2021). EU Eco-Innovation Index 2021, 1-13. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353181570_EU_Eco-Innovation_Index_2021_Policy_brief on May 17, 2023.
2. Arranz, N., Arroyabe, M., Li, J., & Fernandez de Arroyabe, J.C. (2020). Innovation as a driver of eco-innovationin the firm: An approach from the dynamic capabilities theory. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1494-1503. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2448
3. Arundel, A., & Kemp, R. (2009). Measuring eco-innovation. Working Paper Series #2009-017. Maastricht: United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/consumption-innovation/43960846.pdf on March 29, 2023.
4. Carchano, M., Carrasco, I., & González, Á. (2023).Eco-innovation and environmental performance: Insights from Spanish wine companies. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.1242
5. Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., del Rio, P., Del Río P., & Könnölä, T. (2010). Diversity of eco-innovations: reflections from selected case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10-11), 1073-1083.
6. Chaparro-Banegas, N., Mas-Tur, A., Park, H.W., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2023). Factors driving national eco-innovation: New routes to sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2541
7. Dogaru, L. (2020). Eco-Innovation and the Contribution of Companies to the Sustainable Development. Procedia Manufacturing, 46, 294-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.03.043
8. Doran, J., & Ryan, G. (2012). Regulation and firm perception, Eco-innovation and firm performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15, 421-441. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061211272367
9. European Eco-innovation Scoreboard, (2022). Retrieved from https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/eco-innovation_en on February 20, 2024.
10. European Commission. (2011). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions Innovation for a Sustainable Future - The Eco-Innovation Action Plan (Eco-Ap) /* Com/2011/0899 Final.
11. European Commission. (2022). EU Eco-Innovation Index 2021. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/rtd/items/725730/en on May 16, 2023.
12. Godin, B. (2007). Science, accounting and statistics: The input–output framework. Research Policy, 36, 1388-1403.
13. Hajdukiewicz, A., & Pera, B. (2023). Eco-innovation in the European Union: Challenges for catching-up economies. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(1), 145-164. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110108
14. Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of Eco-innovations by type of environmental impact – the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112-122.
15. James, P. (1997). The sustainability cycle: a new tool for product development and design. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design, (2), 52-57.
16. Janger, J., Schubert, T., Andries, P., Rammer, C., & Hoskens, M. (2016). The EU 2020 innovation indicator: A step forward in measuring innovation outputs and outcomes?. ZEW Discussion Papers, 16-072, Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW), Mannheim.
17. Jaffe, A.B., Newell, R.G., & Stavins, R.N. (2002). Environmental Policy and Technological Change. Environmental Resource Economics, 22, 44-70. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015519401088
18. Jo, J.H., Roh, T.W., Kim, S., Youn, Y.C., Park, M.S., Han, K.J., & Jang, E.K. (2015). Eco-innovation for sustainability: Evidence from 49 countries in Asia and Europe. Sustainability, 7(12), 16820-16835.
19. Kemp, R., & Pearson, P. (2007). Final Report of the MEI Project Measuring Eco-Innovation. Maastricht: UM MERIT.
20. Lai, L. (2016). Innovation policies and SMEs development. In M. Kosała, M. Urbaniec, & A. Żur (Eds.), Entrepreneurship: Antecedents and Effects (Przedsiębiorczość Międzynarodowa, pp. 147-163), 2(2). Kraków: Krakow University of Economics.
21. Liao, Z., Weng, C., & Shen, C. (2020). Can public surveillance promote corporate environmental innovation? The mediating role of environmental law enforcement. Sustainable Development, 28, 1519-1527. https://doi. org/10.1002/sd.2101
22. Loučanová, E., & Nosáľová, M. (2020). Eco-innovation performance in Slovakia: Assessment based on ABC analysis of eco-innovation indicators. BioResources, 15(3), 5355-5365.
23. Loucanova, E., Parobek, J., Kalamarova, M., Palus, H., & Lenoch, J. (2015). Eco-innovation performance of Slovakia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 920-924. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00906-5
24. OECD/Eurostat (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. Paris: OECD Publishing/ Luxembourg: Eurostat. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
25. Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation – eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 31-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3
26. Rizos, V., Behrens, A., & Taranic, I. (2015). Measuring Progress in Eco-innovation, (Working Document No. 409, pp 1-17). Center for European Policy Studies, Brussels, Belgium. Retrieved from www.ceps.eu on May 18, 2023.
27. Rodríguez-Rebés, L., Navío-Marco, J., & Ibar-Alonso, R. (2021). Influence of organisational innovation and innovation in general on eco-innovation in European companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(5), 840-867. https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-06-2020-0203
28. Sarkar, A.N. (2013). Promoting Eco-innovations to Leverage Sustainable Development of Eco-industry and Green Growth. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(1), 171-224. Retrieved from https://doi.org/ 10.14207/ejsd.2013.v2n1p171 on 17 May 2023.
29. Tarnawska, K. (2013). Eco-innovation – Tolls for the Transition to green economy. Economics and Management, 18(4), 735-743. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.em.18.4.4485
30. Triguero Cano, A., Moreno-Mondejar, L., & Davia, M.A. (2013). Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecological Economics, 92(C), 25-33. Retrieved from https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.009 on February 15, 2024.
31. Triguero, A., Moreno-Mondéjar, L., & Davia, M.A. (2013). Drivers of different types of ecoinnovation in European SMEs. Ecological Economics, 92, 25-33.
32. United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 201570/1. A/RES/70/1
33. Urbaniec, M. (2019). Competitiveness of innovation-driven economies: Insights from selected European countries. International Entrepreneurship Review (previously published as International Entrepreneurship | Przedsiębiorczość Międzynarodowa), 5(3), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2019.0503.08
34. Urbaniec, M., Tomala, J., & Martinez, S. (2021). Measurements and Trends in Technological Eco-Innovation: Evidence from Environment-Related Patents. Resources, 10, Article #68, pp 1-17. Retrieved from https:// doi.org/10.3390/resources10070068 on 28 of March, 2023.
35. Urbaniec, M., Tomala, J., & Martinez, S. (2021). Measurements and Trends in Technological Eco-Innovation: Evidence from Environment-Related Patents. Resources, 10(7), 68, 1-17. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10070068 on 28 of March, 2023.
36. Wang, L., Zhang, M., & Verousis, T. (2021). The road to economic recovery: Pandemics and innovation, International Review of Financial Analysis, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101729
37. Wei, X., Liu, R., & Chen, W. (2022). How the COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts Green Inventions: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China. Sustainability, 14, 10385. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610385
38. Yurdakul, M., & Kazan, H. (2020). Effects of Eco-Innovation on Economic and Environmental Performance: Evidence from Turkey’s Manufacturing Companies. Sustainability, 12(8), https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083167
39. Zubeltzu-Jaka, E., Erauskin-Tolosa, A., & Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. (2018). Shedding light on the determinants of eco-innovation: A meta-analytic study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 1093-1103. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2054
40. Zulkiffli, S.N.A., Zaidi, N.F.Z., Padlee, S.F., & Sukri, N.K.A. (2022). Eco-Innovation Capabilities and Sustainable Business Performance during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 14, 7525. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137525
41. Zygmunt, A. (2022). The effect of research and development personnel on innovation activities of firms: Evidence from small and medium-sized enterprises from the Visegrad Group countries. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 10(3), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2022.100307